With over 700 registered voters in attendance, electors at the Annual Town Meeting overwhelmingly refused to follow the script laid out by Ancel Glink partner Keri-Lyn Krafthefer.
There were so many people in attendance that the 700 pink ballots designed by Township Administrator Pam Fender ran out.
About ten people stood on the sidelines as a result of the slight miscalculation.
They were told if there were ever a close vote, their vote would count.
They were not happy campers.
But none of the votes were close and none were taken by paper ballot.
There were so many people that the meeting did not start until after 7:30.
The opponents to the Trustees’ position clearly outmaneuvered the proponents.
On the way in people in bright green (they look yellow to me, but I’m color blind) tee-shirts saying,
“NO MORE TAXES,”
handed out a one-page explanation of what the meeting was all about…from the opponents’ viewpoint, of course.
The Huntley Police, including its Chief were visible throughout the night and quite helpfully had flashing lights to slow down Harmony Road traffic as hundreds of cars left one by one after the meeting.
Most of the nine intricately worded resolutions written by the Trustee’s lawyer were ignored as it became obvious that opponents to the Township Trustees’ desire for new offices were not in control of the only form of direct democracy left in Illinois.
The test vote came when Jim
Kearns overwhelming was elected Moderator of the meeting.
My guess is that about 80% of the audience voted for him.
Next came a motion to do first what Ancel Glink put last on the agenda, a motion proposed by Township Road Commissioned Jack Freund to “unwind” (undo) the sale of the township hall to the Grafton Township Road District.
A motion was made to make the last first and it passed overwhelmingly without a paper ballot.
The desires of Township Road Commissioner Freund were explained by his attorney Pat Coen and after its combination with the sale of the Haligus Road property—the subject of three other resolutions—was split, that reversal of the past Supervisor John Rossi Board action was accomplished.
Six irrelevant resolutions that were intended to be considered first were then almost summarily disposed of. Among them were ones ratify the unlawful sale of the Town Hall to the Road District.
“Hot button issues should not rule the day,” Diane Ayers said. “Maybe by leaving this at the end of the agenda some of the tempers will cool, so we can have a reasonable discussion.” Ayers is a Democratic Party precinct committeeman.
Numerous attempts to slow down the meeting were made by those supporting the Trustees’ desires.
More and more mainly older residents left the meeting confident that their side was winning the day.
District 158 School Board members Don Drzal and Paul Troy, at different times, tried to slow down the meeting by requiring a paper ballot.
Neither succeeded.
“This sounds like the township meetings,” Don Glogovsky, a Sun City man who ran for township trustee, interjected.
“Let’s continue with the agenda and do away with all the minutia and let democracy prevail.”
The first Haligus Road property resolution would have ratified the unlawful purchase. It was voted down. There was no question as to the outcome, although one supporter of the Trustees wanted to delay resolution until the next meeting.
His suggestion was met with a chorus of ‘No’s.”
A third school board member, Aileen Seedorf addressed the motion:
“They’re trying to ratify what they did.” (If you want to do that, vote ‘Yes.’ If not, then, Vote ‘No.’”
The second Ancel Glink attorney at the meeting, Rob Bush, explained people who want to approve the purchase should vote in favor.
‘If you don’t want to take the deed, you should vote, ‘No.’”
The vote was not even close.
“Is this the way Christ would want it?” a man from the far end of the bleachers asked.
The next Haligus Road resolution would have the Trustees offer the property back to the Village of Lake in the Hills for the price the township paid, about $99,500. The motion carried with, it seemed, both sides’ support.
The final motion would have the Trustees sell the property if Lake in the Hills did not want to buy it back. The motion was amended to require that the sale would have to be for at least $99,400.
Crystal Lake City Councilman Jeff Thorsen, sitting among a stronghold of Trustees’ supporters, observed,
“I don’t see anything here that that makes (the motions) mutually exclusive.”
During discussion, one man said, “Any price that’s market value should be acceptable.”
The amendment was adopted requiring the $99,500 payment, which Peter Hoffman figured would be about $36,000 an acre.
The amended motion passed overwhelmingly.
Except for giving the Township Road Commissioner the right to sell some surplus property, that pretty much ended the meeting. It was after 9:30 and people were leaving in droves.
Afterward I asked each Trustee the same question:
“What now?”
Gerry McMahon, who had been most out front in his desire for the township to have new offices, said,
“I don’t know. (We) have to digest it first and then proceed with bankruptcy…maybe.”
Betty Zirk’s reply?
“Nothing.”
As I was approaching Rob LaPorta, a man was berating him, telling him he got $100 a meeting for (doing less than a stellar job).
“Who are you serving?”
he said in a loud voice, using a barn yard epitaph to LaPorta’s reply.
“Who is this Bozo?” LaPorta asked.
“We don’t do anything behind closed doors,” I heard LaPorta say.
Lake in the Hills Trustee Steve Harlfiner, who lost the role of Moderator to Kearns, approached the cluster, saying, “Good luck selling (the property).”
“Linda Moore wouldn’t be in office if you hadn’t bought that building,” a second man said.
“We went by the advice we were given,” LaPorta replied.
“We made mistakes,” Trustee Barb Murphy, standing nearby, conceded.
“If you hadn’t tried to get that three and a half million dollar building, Linda wouldn’t have been elected,” the second mean reiterated.
I asked Murphy what was next.
“We can unwind,” a position she was the first Trustee to suggest last November.
When I got to talk to the acknowledged leader of the Trustees, LaPorta told me,
“We’re going to follow what was completed tonight and get the township processes to run smoothly.”
As I was walking out the meeting with two folks I was taking home, I asked Fender if I could have a commemorative ballot.
I had already been given an extra large tee-shirt saying,
“No More Taxes,”
which folks will see me wearing this Thursday at the Crystal Lake TEA (Taxed Enough Already) at the corner of Route 14 and Main Street.
“That’s the most fraudulent meeting I even saw in my entire life,” the Township Administrator remarked.
The separation of powers suit that Township Supervisor Linda Moore filed against the four trustees is scheduled for arguments during the second week of May before the same judge, Michael Caldwell, who issued the ruling that stopped the new township hall dead in its tracks.
looks like laporta really has class . Who is this bozo he says. yeah he and the guy from Sun city are really the type of people you want making financial decisions for you.
Just amazed,Give the electorate a little power once a year and it really brings out the idiots! Glad we don’t have to that for another year.
Hey C,what sausage in a yellow tee were you? 🙂
Why ta um dids we buy the property for $60,000 and we owes $999,000 DOH!!!
Gosh! I thought the “LaPorta” fan club was going to try to do a fillabuster with all of their interruptions! Let’s think about this people……there are how many foreclosures, real estate taxes being purchased for those who can’t afford it and we’re going to spend how much to build a building? This is absurd in this economy! Was this building going to be as empty as the Village of Huntley City Hall? You can practically bowl down the center of the corridor there and not hit or hurt anyone! Now, I think it’s time to get rid of the township trustees and let the municipals and county take over. These people get a $100 per meeting for what? I sure hope the point was made clear that we cannot afford such extravagant items like a new building when our properties keep depreciating! Time to get these “lame brains” out of office!
The meeting was an embarrassment on both sides. It’s obvious that the majority of the electors wanted the whole issue unwound and brought back to square one. Despite what WakaWaka thinks, not everyone that was against the property sale and purchases is an uneducated buffoon. It was done illegally and needed to be undone. End of story. The shenanigans and verbal sparing that ensued was merely a sideshow to the real issue.
If you sincerely want to get away from these types of meetings, then do away with township government entirely. It has outlived its usefulness, especially in major metropolitan areas. The Road District (separate entity) can still perform the duties that are required and I’m quite certain that the duties of the assessor could be absorbed by the county.
And finally, quite a few of the elected officials in the audience (specifically the ones mentioned here) left a lot to be desired from a professionalism stand point.
I witnessed a ton of lame brains last night. outta 700 people only about ten or twenty were nornal.
Such a freak show, totaly worth the price of admission.
You really think that meeting solved anthing? Baaah hahaha, those trustee’s have three more years to stick it to ya.
I missed ganny’s cry babies? Damm the milk’s gone BAD 🙂
Cal, I’m disappointed. No pics or mention of Linda’s “voting coaches” holding up instructional signs for the voting challenged. I have never seen moore tainted procedures.
At your request a “Yes” photo has been added.
An author that calls himself “WakaWaka”, uses the phrases “Baaah hahaha…” “stick it to ya.”, “lame brains…”, admittedly only considers 10 or 20 people out of 700 to be “normal”, and believes it is good that the electorate can only voice their opinions once a year is calling people “idiots”.
Makes me wonder what this guy is seeing when he looks in the mirror.
I envision a political crony, possibly a “Good Old Boy”.
Grafton Trustees – take notice, last night’s meeting is what happens when people don’t like the financial choices you make or how you make them.
Keep pushing people/taxpayers and keep pushing for a huge building, and the people WILL push back.
They don’t want you to build another government kingdom and they don’t want anymore kings and queens…..especially not those who think 10 month or 3 month severance packages for their chosen employee makes sense.
Three cheers for the People of Grafton Township.
You see that meeting was required by law so the public has a say in it’s democracy. Only problem is the trustees really don’t care what you say or want. They have an agenda and the only way it includes you is for you to reach deep down into your pockets and dumping cash into the bucket. A lot of these townships want new buildings. Of course along with that comes new office furniture, etc..
See they say their space is not adequate and they get more roads to take care of and for the last trick they want to have programs for seniors and such. Why, as for every new 1/2 of road they get some town annexes previous property taking more away from them. Time to let go of an antiquated system. Maybe next time around there should be a vote to dump these townships.
It never ends……….
When I look in the mirro I see a great looking smart person with alot happines and succses in his life. What I saw in those bleacher last night was alot of Tax credit farmers making complete jackasses out them selfs. Taking advantage of miss informed old people.
I can pay my $63 a year in tax to grafton without whining about.
Hey did anyone eles think the moderator looked like Barney from the Simpsons ? “Burrrrp”
Why no post today from “NOT A GRAFTON RESIDENT” apparently you too were at the meeting last night and found out, YES, IT IS ABOUT THE BUILDING.
Crazy changed HIS name to DOH in the Herald and WakaWaka here. Jimmy D I hope I was not on your list… I just wanted acurate clarity when we were served alot of vague language
Thanks Cadman for illustrating that you refuse to show respect to anyone. I actually have better things to do then read this blog all day every day.
Thanks for being concerned that I was missing though.
What is a “TOWNSHIP”S USEFULLNESS ANYWAY? LETS VOTE THIS OUT? CAN ANYONE PROVIDE GOOD REASONS/ARGUMENTS AS TO WHY WE NEED THEM OR SHOULD WANT THEM.
DORR TOWNSHIP RESIDIENT
OKAY, AFTER READING SOME COMMENTS, WHY DO WE HAVE TOWNSHIPS??? MY GOAL, NOW, LETS GET RID OF A LINE ITEM ON OUR TAX BILL. PEOPLE LOOK AT YOUR TAX BILLS. YOU PAY AN ADDITIONAL TAX AND PENSIONS TO YOUR TOWNSHIP, LIBRARY, POLICE AND FIRE, AND TOWNSHIP!
What is a “TOWNSHIP”S USEFULLNESS ANYWAY? LETS VOTE THIS OUT? CAN ANYONE PROVIDE GOOD REASONS/ARGUMENTS AS TO WHY WE NEED THEM OR SHOULD WANT THEM.
DORR TOWNSHIP RESIDENT
RXS Go for it. figure out how to get rid of and take some action.
There are alot of big talkers but no one ever does anything!!!
I’m all for getting rid of a backasward penny anti township that mainly serves Tax credit farmers. Gees half there familys would be out of jobs.
Let’s close it all down Road district Too.