In September 2008, the Huntley school district and the Huntley teachers union (the “HEA” for Huntley Education Association) ended a strike and reached an agreement.
It was for three years.
All remaining issues that were left for joint committees of the district and union…salary and retirement benefits, for instance.
They have yet to be agreed upon.
Seeing how we are a few months away from two years later, it’s easy to assume the Huntley teachers want more, not less.
But, wanting more is quite an approach to dealing with the current economic climate and reality.
I don’t have any written proof but my suspicions are the Huntley teachers union filed for arbitration in an attempt to get more from a “final agreement.”
The district uses the term “Final Agreement” in its web site link to the contract.
The cat (not Keeley) may be out of the bag, word of mouth wise, if it turns out the union leaders notified its members that they filed for arbitration.
This is why I have filed Freedom of Information requests for any documents filed or correspondence and emails sent by the union.
Supt. John Burkey has the choice of being transparent and providing the information or he can try to cite an exemption from disclosure.
It’s the District 158’s leader’s choice whether or not he wants residents to know what the teachers union is asking for, and what the district’s response is to the union.
He may not want taxpayers to know the teachers union filed for arbitration (if they officially did.)
The current twenty-six page agreement can be found on the district’s web site using this link.
On page 24 you can find this:
The BOE and HEA will form a joint committee to review compensation for certified staff members. Review areas include:
Somehow in a we-want-more interpretation of what words mean Huntley teachers apparently are expecting something more to be agreed to when only committees were agreed to.
Huntley spent over a $100,000 in lawyer fees for an attorney to sit in on the many hours of negotiations including the many hours when there was literally nothing to do but wait for a response from the union who was then at the time in a separate room.
That’s a lot of money to make sure, for example, an agreement is carefully drafted that doesn’t put the district at future financial risk because of a union legal maneuver.
If Huntley entered into an agreement that somehow allows the union’s attorney to get more benefits paid to the teachers without the board agreeing to it, in my opinion, Huntley got some bad advice.
It would be so bad, if I were on the board, I would try to terminate the lawyer’s services, if that person was the district’s primary source of legal advice.
While other districts are discussing with their teachers union on modifying their current agreement in the downward direction, many people may have this reaction if it turns out the Huntley teachers are officially pressing for more benefits under the current agreement:
What planet are the Huntley teachers living on?
As you may expect, no Huntley teacher may want to be officially quoted or indirectly referenced about what is really going on. My email address is on this page. I more welcome information and am happy to pass it along without identifying the source.
One might guess that the union hasn’t agreed to any joint committee meetings to discuss the current salary schedule.
For months the union took the position that there won’t be any such joint meetings on alternatives to the current salary schedule until after an agreement was reached on retirement compensation.
Apparently the state’s pension benefits and plan isn’t good enough for Huntley teachers, who probably want more benefits and lower costs written into their agreement.