Part 12 – Zane Seipler’s Argument that His Case Shouldn’t Be Dismissed for Contempt of Court

D. Plaintiff and his counsel hid no information.

Blake Horwitz

Blake Horwitz

Zane Seipler

Zane Seipler

In the September 14, 2011 deposition of Mr. Seipler, Mr. Horwitz specifically asked Mr. Seipler clear, direct questions as to whether he uploaded the information onto the offending website.

Mr. Sotos admits that the answers were clear. (Sotos TR. at 969.)

Even though Defendants seeks sanctions regarding this deposition (Dkt No. 384, pg. 8, allegations 14-15), it is clear that Plaintiff was deliberate and straightforward in his answers.

= = = = =

Part 13 tomorrow.


Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>