Letter Critical of MCC Health Club Feasibility Study Released

When I heard McHenry College Board member Ron Parrish cite a letter from a constituent that was critical of the College’s hiring of Power Wellness to conduct a feasibility study of whether building a new health club would be a good idea, I immediately filed a Freedom of Information request for it.

It came with the name and address of the sender withheld.

Read it below and determine for yourself whether the criticisms are legitimate:

The letter critical of the Health Club cited at the last meeting of the McHenry County College Board

The letter critical of the Health Club cited at the last meeting of the McHenry County College Board

The correspondent questions “every single study commissioned by the current administration.”  He suggests that every study has been flawed, but “miraculously” supports the position of President Vicky Smith.

Also commented upon is the $42 million cost of the current proposal…before the feasibility study has been completed.

The writer, who seems to be from the Harvard area, wonders how much could be accomplished by putting $42 million into remodeling the old Harvard Motorola plant.


Comments

Letter Critical of MCC Health Club Feasibility Study Released — 2 Comments

  1. Universities, colleges, and community colleges are part of the ruling elite(ists).
    They get their fingers into taxpayers’ pockets an never let go. Taxpayers literally pay these people — even when they retire and no longer work for taxpayers — unil they die, then their estate pays some more.

    This has to stop. We our here in realityland are broke and special interests who buy politicians are getting their dollars from the projects like this in communities where there are no life-sustaining jobs. When will it end?

    http://www.cusdi.org/index.html#Introduction
    Direct Democracy Amendment to Repair Dysfunctional Government and Control its Excesses—Summary and Introduction
    Download State Action Package with State Initiative, State Bill, and U.S. Amendment (3MB)

    1. Summary Congress is dysfunctional, corrupt, and unresponsive to the popular will. This Constitutional Amendment can permanently solve many of the problems:

    The People’s power of initiatives is extended to the Federal level—giving the people direct control over Congressional legislation, rules, perquisites, modus operandi, etc. Though the people can handle only a small portion of the volume of Congressional business, they can permanently prevent or mitigate the most harmful Congressional actions and force Congress to act for the Nation’s and the people’s benefit.

    The cost barrier to proposing initiatives is minimized. This takes initiatives beyond the control of special interests, whose money currently corrupts most state and city initiative systems. It permits the best minds and creativity of the entire American people to find solutions that are impossible for a dysfunctional and corrupt Congress.

    The power to handle the volume of proposed initiatives and select (i.e., qualify) which candidate initiatives go on the ballot is granted to a super grand jury of 500 who are responsible only to the People and well protected from outside influence. This takes government and “big money” entirely out of the initiative process until after the announcement of the ballot’s candidate initiatives. In effect, Federal Initiatives become the people’s small but effective parallel branch of Congress.

    The debate on initiatives is extended via the internet, making direct citizen participation on proposed initiatives a reality starting when they are first proposed. The super grand jury of 500 periodically splits into randomly-selected double-checking 20-member task forces to rank the proposed initiatives. As the initiatives are sequentially culled, the full grand jury finally selects the best few initiatives upon which the People will vote.

    Today, 70 percent of US Citizens can vote on state and local initiatives. The people in the 24 States and in many Cities with initiatives can effectively force their states to use the second method of amending the US Constitution. The second method does not require Congressional support—the Framers of our Constitution specifically included it to remedy excessive Congressional corruption. The fight to get support from 14 of the 26 none-initiative states will be a hard and long, but is possible.

    Will Federal initiatives work? They have worked for over a century in Switzerland, whose standard of living has risen from poverty to well above that of the US. They worked in Ancient Greece well enough to produce western civilization, democracy, and the leading world power of that time. The American people value their initiatives—they have never permitted a state to repeal their initiative power. Long before the Amendment is eventually adopted, the people can enact state-level testing and refinement of the new initiative process. For remaining doubters, and because all change may have unforeseeable consequences, the Amendment includes its own repeal option to return to exactly what we have now.

    How can we start? The easiest way is by initating and supporting your State Initiative that requires your State to support the Federal Initiative Amendment. The most appropriate states have direct constitutional initiatives: AZ, AR, CA, CO, FL, IL, MI, MO, MT, NE, NV, ND, OH, OK, OR, and SD, followed by states with direct legislative initiatives: ID, UT, and WA.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>