McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

More Than 75 Hear Joe Walsh in Huntley

February 21, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Huntley, Huntley Area TEA Party, Joe Walsh

Joe Walsh spoke to a meeting of the Huntley Tea Party Wednesday night.

Joe Walsh spoke to a meeting of the Huntley Tea Party Wednesday night.

Here’s a photo of former Congressman Joe Walsh talking to a crowd of Huntley Area Tea Party members at the Huntley Park District building.

10 Comments to “More Than 75 Hear Joe Walsh in Huntley”


  1. LCTruth says:

    No diversity there

    1
  2. Orville H. Brettman says:

    Humm ………. I count about 20 women and 17 men.

    That’s pretty evenly split.

    It’s hard to get exactly 50/50 at a meeting, so I guess it’s about as diverse as it can be.

    2
  3. Jim B says:

    Your’e right LCT, no diversity, just hard working Americans who pay their taxes and ask for nothing in return.

    3
  4. LuvLuvLinda says:

    No diversity???

    Why I can clearly see a deadbeat dad. Sad.

    Cal, Did you skip Linda’s Special Grafton Meeting last night?

    4
  5. Cal Skinner says:

    I did. I was out to dinner and playing Scrabble with my family.

    5
  6. There were more women then men there. Moreover, the most outspoken person there, besides Joe, was a woman in the front row.

    Finally, if you are not brave enough to post under your own name, your credibility is meaningless.

    Just my opinion.
    Andrew Gasser

    6
  7. The Oncoming Storm says:

    I’m a little surprised the Huntley TEA Party did not place he American Flag in the correct position (on the speaker’s right) on the stage at this event.

    Just my 2 cents.

    7
  8. LCTruth says:

    Clearly the Tea Puppies do not grasp the meaning of diversity.

    I suspect a good reason why they are getting push back and losing ground.

    8
  9. Antonio Scarpacci says:

    Regarding the flag placement, ROTFLMAO!!!!! These “patriots” are just anarchists after all!

    9
  10. Watching says:

    Finally, if you are not brave enough to post under your own name, your credibility is meaningless.

    Because you said it, it must be true.

    (the above comment was meant in jest, while I am sure that the poster to whom it was responsive will answer something like, “Yes I am right” (sad), … perhaps the poster should consider that some of us don’t want to post our name, because we want to be heard for our ideas, and not who we are ™.) I am not endorsing those who take pot shots, but I am TOTALLY endorsing those who viciously attack sloppy thinking, parroting, and general whining.

    10


Leave a Reply

*