Algonquin Township voters elected a majority of reformers to the Township Board last election:

• Russell W. Cardelli
• Larry Emery
• Melissa A. Sanchez

One of the hopes of supporters was that they would cut taxes.

And they have, but only by a teeny-tiny bit.

1%.

Recently attorney Tim Dwyer filed a tax protest suit against Algonquin Township, among other tax districts, claiming that the township had way too much money in the bank to justify the amount they forced the County Treasurer to extract this year.

I am going to run the court complaint again in the hope that some taxpayers might attend the 7 PM meeting tonight (Wednesday) at the Township Hall on Route 14 between Route 31 and Cary (entrance to the meeting room way in the back of the main building at the northwest corner).

The meeting starts at 7 PM and people can express their opinions at the beginning of the meeting.

Here’s the basis for asking for a much lower tax levy:

Algonquin Township’s Tax Protest Suit

Tax protest attorney Tim Dwyer is suing Algonquin Township on behalf of local property taxpayers for having too much money in the bank to justify levying real estate taxes.

Here are the details:

In December 2014, Algonquin Township adopted its Tax Levy Ordinance.

The Township levy was for $1,800,368.00.

The Road District levy was for $4,048,930.00.

Although the Township and the Township Road District are separate entities for purposes of its tax levy, the Township audit incorporates both entities.

After Algonquin Township and the Algonquin Road District issued its levies in December of 2014, the last audit for both entities found that at the end of the 2013-14 fiscal year, the Township had $11,711,449 in cash and investments.

Prior to issuing its levies, the Township and the Township Road District had a three year average annual expenditure of $4,545,760, according to its own internal audits.

As of its last fiscal year or March 31, 2014, the Township and the Road District had assets of $11,711,225, according to its 2013-14 comprehensive audit.

The assets on hand, coupled with the tax revenue from its 2014 levy, puts the Township and the Road District having in excess of 15 million dollars, or three times the available funds for that which is necessary for its annual expenses.

Spending approximately 4.5 million dollars per year, the Township and the Road District had ample funds in order to meet their respective annual expenses without even imposing a levy.

According to its own audit, the Township, collectively, had investments of $4,356,863, which was almost as much as its three year annual expenditures.

This remains a violation of Illinois law, rendering both levies as excessive, invalid and illegal.

According to its own 2014 audit, prior to its levy for the Town Fund of $1,578,536, the Township had $3,166,393 in liquid assets for the Town Fund.

The $3,166,393, coupled with the levy of $1,578,536 exceeds 2.6 times the annual average expenditure of 1.8 million. 155. As such, the Town levy issued by the Township is invalid, excessive and illegal.

The same is true for the General Assistance Fund.

With respect to the Road Distict, the Road and Bridge Fund, coupled with the Equipment and Building Fund, the Road District had reserves in excess of $5,400,000.

The annual expenses for both of these Funds were approximately 2.4 million.

The tax levy revenue, coupled with the existing funds on hand, was nearly three times the amount of the annual expenditure.

As such, the Road and Bridge Fund, as well as the Equipment and Building Fund, are excessive, invalid and illegal.

In addition to the excess accumulation, the Road District levied funds in excess of that which was appropriated.

It is well settled in Illinois, that a municipal entity can only spend that which has been legitimately appropriated. In other words, the Levy Ordinance cannot exceed those line items delineated within the Budget and Appropriation Ordinance.

For its General Road Fund, the Road District appropriated $2,388,600, but levied for $2,576,076.

As a matter of law, the General Road Fund is void.

For its Social Security Fund, the Road District appropriated $70,000, but levied $71,068.

For its IMRF Fund, the Road District appropriated $100,000, but levied $129,890.

Similar to the General Road Fund, the levy for the aforesaid funds are void and illegal, and should be ordered rebated as a matter of law.

Here’s what the suit requests:

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Tax Protestors pray that this Court consider the matters raised herein, find, determine and otherwise adjudicate that the entire levies adopted by Algonquin Township and the Algonquin Road District are illegal, void and/or excessive as a matter of law, order that the McHenry County Treasurer issue full rebate payments to the Tax Objectors, award statutory interest pursuant to 35 ILCS 200/23-20, et. seq. and issue whatever further relief this Court deems just and appropriate.

Last year at the initiative of newly-elected Trustee Larry Emery, the Town Fund levy was reduced 1%.