Not since a McHenry County Board Chairman tried to change County Board Rules to banish photographers to the back of the room have restrictions been evident.
That was in April, 2007, an initiative of County Board Chairman Ken Koehler.
Yesterday, entering the Board room, one could see a sign on the far wall saying, “Camera. This area only.”
The sign on the wall reads, “Cameras. This area only.”
Guess it must be some effort by Democrat Jack Franks to limit photographs of his face from the front.
Side view of Jack Franks.
On the floor was duct tape outline about a six foot square along the wall.
I note that the Northwest Herald photographer Rick Bamman ignored the sign.
None of the photos in the online story were taken from the newly-designated area.
I do not think Jack ever learned how to play in a sandbox.
A bully is usually removed, until they can play nice.
Well Jack has a big sandbox now folks, he is using tape to divide it, well, tape does not work well in sand Jack.
So Jack Franks does the rule only apply to Cal Skinner, is the rule not enforceable, or are there special exceptions for the Northwest Herald.
The evidence is in the photo above.
Maybe Jack was just having a bad spray tan day.
Is Bob ‘Booby’ Miller in the peanut gallery?
Jack Franks for Attorney General
From observing Cal’s lack of understanding of photographers’ general etiquette, his lack of understanding for inner-personnel space, I get why institutions have rules on where he can stand when acting as a “reporter”.
When I observed him using his camera, he would literally barge up to an individual and stick his camera in one’s face.
It made no difference with whom one was speaking or even if the individual was washing his hands.
A complete social moron with a camera.
So, please follow the rules, Cal.
Who cares –
Cal didn’t even attend the last meeting wherein he was trying to goad his flock of misfits into opposing a $100,000 line item in a budget. Talk about the captain fleeing a sinking ship; he left is pawns Wilcox, Kurtz and Barnes looking like fools!
In today’s Northwest Herald’s coverage of the meeting, you’ll see that Curly, Larry, and Moe have now been joined by Chris.
There is no Cal Skinner flock and he has no pawns.
He has a political blog and is a Republican precinct committeeman.
But there is a Jack Franks flock that includes patronage hires and McHenry County Blog commenters.
Mr. Skinner was following the photography “rule” at yesterday’s board meeting.
It was the Northwest Herald photographer who was not following the “rule.”
Speaking of rules, here is a rule that has the Jack Franks PAC didn’t follow.
The political action committee of Jack Franks reimbursed his patronage hire, Bridget Geenen, a flat monthly amount for mileage, instead of actual mileage (as the State Board of Elections rule clearly requires).
http://www.mchenrycountyblog.com/2017/07/24/jack-franks-reimburses-patronage-worker-with-four-500-mileage-checks
Charlie, if Jack runs for the AG’s office, it would be like running Rod B for Governor . . . and he is in jail.
But what do I know, the Democrats do have a different way of thinking.
And Mark, I see one month there were two mileage reimbursement checks.
It is so obvious there is something wrong with this; isn’t anyone on the Board paying attention?
Why does it continue?
OldManWinter – It does look like Miller.
Wonder what he has.
“There is no Cal Skinner flock”
Say’s his Parrot.
Mark gets the “Hack of the Week” award.
Do you think Boobie is doing consulting?
wouldn’t that be a patronage hire?
or is that stretching it?
the circus is back in town.
The county chair needs to go on an intensive diet.
Not a good side profile, imo…
Explains the tape, maybe
Camera-gate promises to be the beginning of the end of Jack D. Franks’ political career. Next, some relevant prodigious research about the subject to enlighten the intellect of the millions of readers of this sunshine blog, pride of McHenry county.
Photography is a word derived from the Greek words photos (“light”) and graphein (“to draw”). The word was first used by the scientist Sir John F.W. Herschel in 1839. It is a method of recording images by the action of light or related radiation onto a sensitive material.
Alhazen (Ibn Al-Haytham) was a great authority on optics in the Middle Ages who lived around 1000AD. He invented the first pinhole camera (also called the Camera Obscura} and was able to explain why the images were upside down.
The first casual reference to the optic laws that made pinhole cameras possible was observed and noted by Aristotle around 330 BC. He questioned why the sun could make a circular image when it shined through a square hole.
On a summer day in 1827, Joseph Nicephore Niepce developed the first photographic image with a camera obscura. Prior to Niepce, people just used the camera obscura for viewing or drawing purposes, not for making photographs. By letting light draw the picture, Niepce’s heliographs, or sun prints as they were called, were the prototype for the modern photograph.
Niepce placed an engraving onto a metal plate coated in bitumen and then exposed it to light. The shadowy areas of the engraving blocked light, but the whiter areas permitted light to react with the chemicals on the plate. When Niepce placed the metal plate in a solvent, gradually an image, until then invisible, appeared.
However, Niepce’s photograph required eight hours of light exposure to create and would soon fade away.
Fellow Frenchman, Louis Daguerre was also experimenting with ways to capture an image, but it would take him another dozen years before Daguerre was able to reduce exposure time to less than 30 minutes and keep the image from disappearing afterwards.
Daguerre was the inventor of the first practical process of photography. In 1829, he formed a partnership with Niepce to improve the process Niepce had developed. In 1839, following several years of experimentation and Niepce’s death, Daguerre developed a more convenient and effective method of photography and named it after himself.
Daguerre’s daguerreotype process started by fixing the images onto a sheet of silver-plated copper. He then polished the silver and coated it in iodine, creating a surface that was sensitive to light. Then, he put the plate in a camera and exposed it for a few minutes. After the image was painted by light, Daguerre bathed the plate in a solution of silver chloride. This process created a lasting image that would not change if exposed to light.
In 1839, Daguerre and Niepce’s son sold the rights for the daguerreotype to the French government and published a booklet describing the process. The daguerreotype gained popularity quickly and by 1850, there were over seventy daguerreotype studios in New York City alone.
The inventor of the first negative from which multiple positive prints were made was Henry Fox Talbot, an English botanist, mathematician and a contemporary of Daguerre.
Talbot sensitized paper to light using a silver salt solution. He then exposed the paper to light. The background became black and the subject was rendered in gradations of grey. This was a negative image. And from the paper negative, Talbot made contact prints, reversing the light and shadows to create a detailed picture. In 1841, he perfected this paper-negative process and called it a calotype, Greek for beautiful picture.
Tintypes, patented in 1856 by Hamilton Smith, was another medium that heralded the birth of photography. A thin sheet of iron was used to provide a base for light-sensitive material, yielding a positive image.
In 1851, Frederick Scoff Archer, an English sculptor, invented the wet plate negative. Using a viscous solution of collodion, he coated glass with light-sensitive silver salts.
Because it was glass and not paper, this wet plate created a more stable and detailed negative.
Photography advanced considerably once sensitized materials could be coated on plate glass. However, wet plates had to be developed quickly before the emulsion dried. In the field, this meant carrying along a portable darkroom.
In 1879, the dry plate was invented, a glass negative plate with a dried gelatin emulsion. Dry plates could be stored for a period of time. This meant photographers no longer needed portable darkrooms and could now hire technicians to develop their photographs. Dry processes absorbed light so rapidly that the hand-held camera was now possible.
In 1889, George Eastman invented film with a base that was flexible, unbreakable and could be rolled. Emulsions coated on a cellulose nitrate film base, such as Eastman’s, made the mass-produced box camera a reality.
In the early 1940s, commercially viable color films (except Kodachrome) were brought to the market. These films used the modern technology of dye-coupled colors in which a chemical process connects the three dye layers together to create an apparent color image.
Tic, tock, tic, tock…
More prodigious research on this historic scandal.
The first flexible roll films, dating to 1889, were made of cellulose nitrate, which is chemically similar to guncotton. A nitrate-based film will deteriorate over time, releasing oxidants and acidic gasses. It is also highly flammable. Special storage for this film is required.
Nitrate film is historically important because it allowed for the development of roll films. The first flexible movie films measured 35-mm wide and came in long rolls on a spool.
In the mid-1920s, using this technology, 35-mm roll film was developed for the camera. By the late 1920s, medium-format roll film was created. It measured six centimeters wide and had a paper backing that made it easy to handle in daylight. This led to the development of the twin-lens-reflex camera in 1929. Nitrate film was produced in sheets (4 x 5-inches), ending the need for fragile glass plates.
Triacetate film came later and was more stable, flexible as well as fireproof. Most films produced up to the 1970s were based on this technology. Since the 1960s, polyester polymers have been used for gelatin base films. The plastic film base is far more stable than cellulose and is not a fire hazard.
Today, technology has produced film with T-grain emulsions. These films use light-sensitive silver halides (grains) that are T-shaped thus rendering a much finer grain pattern. Films like this offer greater detail and higher resolution, translating to sharper images.
Traditionally, linen rag papers were used as the base for making photographic prints. Prints on this fiber-base paper coated with a gelatin emulsion are quite stable when properly processed. Their stability is enhanced if the print is toned with either sepia (brown tone) or selenium (light, silvery tone).
Paper will dry out and crack under poor archival conditions. Loss of the image can also be due to high humidity, but the real enemy of paper is chemical residue left by the photographic fixer, a chemical solution cued to remove grain from films and prints during processing. In addition, contaminants in the water used for processing and washing can cause damage. If a print is not fully washed to remove all traces of fixer, the result will be discoloration and image loss.
The next innovation in photographic papers was resin-coating or water-resistant paper. The idea was to use normal linen fiber-base paper and coat it with a plastic (polyethylene) material, making the paper water-resistant. The emulsion is then placed on a plastic covered base paper. The problem with resin-coated papers was that the image rides on the plastic coating and was susceptible to fading.
At first, color prints were not stable because organic dyes were used to make the color image. The image would literally disappear from the film or paper base as the dyes deteriorate. Kodachrome, dating to the first third of the 20th century, was the first color film to produce prints that could last half a century. Now, new techniques are creating permanent color prints that last 200 years or more.
New printing methods using computer-generated digital images and highly stable pigments offer permanency for color photographs.
By definition, a camera is a lightproof object with a lens that captures incoming light and directs the light and resulting image towards film (optical camera) or the imaging device (digital camera).
All camera technology is based on the law of optics first discovered by Aristotle. By the mid-1500s, a sketching device for artists called the camera obscura (dark chamber) was common. The camera obscura was a lightproof box with a pinhole (later lens were used) on one side and a translucent screen on the other.
This screen was used for tracing by the artists of the inverted image transmitted through the pinhole.
Around 1600, Della Porta reinvented the pinhole camera. Apparently, he was the first European to publish any information on the pinhole camera and is sometimes mistakingly credited with its invention. Johannes Kepler was the first person to coin the phrase Camera Obscura in 1604. And in 1609, Kepler further suggested the use of a lens to improve the image projected by a Camera Obscura.
The earliest cameras used in the daguerreotype process were made by opticians, instrument makers or sometimes even by the photographers themselves. The most popular cameras utilized a sliding-box design. The lens was placed in the front box. A second, slightly smaller box slid into the back of the larger box. The focus was controlled by sliding the rear box forward or backwards. A laterally reversed image would be obtained unless the camera was fitted with a mirror or prism to correct this effect.
When the sensitized plate was placed in the camera, the lens cap would be removed to start the exposure.
George Eastman, a dry plate manufacturer from Rochester, New York, invented the Kodak camera. For 22 dollars, an amateur could purchase a camera with enough film for 100 shots. After use, it was sent back to the company, which then processed the film.
The ad slogan read, “You press the button, we do the rest.” A year later, the delicate paper film was changed to a plastic base so that photographers could do their own processing.
Eastman’s first simple camera in 1888 was a wooden, light-tight box with a simple lens and shutter that was factory-filled with film. The photographer pushed a button to produce a negative. Once the film was used up, the photographer mailed the camera with the film still in it to the Kodak factory where the film was removed from the camera, processed and printed. The camera was then reloaded with film and returned.
Blitzlichtpulver or flashlight powder was invented in Germany in 1887 by Adolf Miethe and Johannes Gaedicke. Lycopodium powder (the waxy spores from club moss) was used in early flash powder.
The first modern photoflash bulb or flashbulb was invented by Austrian Paul Vierkotter. Vierkotter used magnesium-coated wire in an evacuated glass globe. Magnesium-coated wire was soon replaced by aluminum foil in oxygen. In 1930, the first commercially available photoflash bulb was patented by German Johannes Ostermeier. These flashbulbs were named the Vacublitz. General Electric also made a flashbulb called the Sashalite.
English inventor and manufacturer Frederick Wratten founded one of the first photographic supply businesses in 1878. The company, Wratten and Wainwright, manufactured and sold collodion glass plates and gelatin dry plates.
In 1878, Wratten invented the “noodling process” of silver-bromide gelatin emulsions before washing. In 1906, Wratten, with the assistance of Dr. C.E. Kenneth Mees (E.C.K Mees), invented and produced the first panchromatic plates in England. Wratten is best known for the photographic filters that he invented and are still named after him, the Wratten Filters. Eastman Kodak purchased his company in 1912.
As early as 1905, Oskar Barnack had the idea of reducing the format of film negatives and then enlarging the photographs after they had been exposed.
As development manager at Leica, he was able to put his theory into practice. He took an instrument for taking exposure samples for cinema film and turned it into the world’s first 35 mm camera: the ‘Ur-Leica’.
Polaroid photography was invented by Edwin Herbert Land. Land was the American inventor and physicist whose one-step process for developing and printing photos created instant photography. The first Polaroid camera was sold to the public in 1948.
Fuji introduced the disposable camera in 1986. We call them disposables but the people who make these cameras want you to know that they’re committed to recycling the parts, a message they’ve attempted to convey by calling their products “single-use cameras.”
Typo in the last line: Tic, tock, tic, tock…
Fallen Angel, have you stooped to a new low with Plagiarism? Tic Tock, Tic Toc.
I take great offense by reading how our sunshine blogger is accused of being a social moron. Thanks to him, I am partially aware of the nutritional value of the water our McHenry county board chairperson was drinking last night. No photographer even attempts to come close to the courage our paparazzi, freeloader sunshine blogger displays in his self-imposed mission of courageous journalism. Fellow illinoisans, please contact us if you need to take an in-your-face picture of your county board chairperson. Tic, tock, tic, tock…
This B.S. is worthy of a Comedy Central show.
To Cal Skinner.
Looks like you are allowing first amendment rights to individuals no matter how large and how somewhat off topic are the size of their comments.
Very good. Let the left wingers, progressives(?) and Democrat inclined people post their long diatribe stuff.
This is in stark contrast to the those such as administrators and professors (?) at colleges and universities who allow left wing radical students and other left wingers to quash free speech by conservatives.
Your first amendment rights are only protect government infricyiomnot a private citizen blogger.
This is why it’s completely legal for Facebook to ban neo-Nazis.
Which they should.
Your first amendment rights don’t matter on a blog or a social network site.
Cal Skinner demonstrates this by deleting comments all the time.
Your first amendment rights are only protected from government infringement, not from a private citizen blogger.
This is why it’s completely legal for Facebook to ban neo-Nazis.
Which they should.
Your first amendment rights don’t matter on a blog or a social network site.
Cal Skinner demonstrates this by deleting comments all the time.
Never said that blogs such as Cal Skinner are “required” to abide to First Amendment Rights.
Anyway, it is more likely that socialists, some Democrats and the loony liberal fringe at numerous colleges that are funded by government do indeed deny First Amendment Rights to many conservative and Republican speakers and students.
Are you high?
I listen to Ben Shapiros podcast.
He just spoke at Berkeley.
Fairy Play, you’re Progressive and a Racist.
But then again Dems and KKK go hand in hand.
They go together like Peas and Carrots!
Oh Here’s some great new stuff on your hero boss, Fairy Play,
https://www.lyingjackfranks.com