Barrington Hills Village Board Unanimously Passes Resolution to Open Village Businesses and Churches and Raises Questions About Governor’s Legal Authority

After five weeks with serious questions as to the legal authority of the Governor”s Executive Orders regarding Covid-19, the Barrington Hills Board of Trustees unanimously passed a Resolution Tuesday night to open the community and to provide guidance to its residents, businesses and churches. 

Further, the Resolution asks the Illinois State General Assembly for clarity as to the legal authority of the Governor’s “Restore Illinois” Phased Reopening Program.

Additionally, the resolution seeks the removal of Barrington Hills from the Northeast Region, which includes the City of Chicago.

Removal from that region would  immediately move Barrington Hills from Phase 2 to Phase 5 for reopening, based on the metrics in its specific area.

The Resolution also asked the Village’s Attorney to research the possibility of entering into lawsuits against the Governor’s Orders, and to look into joining in existing suits that have already been filed.

The Barrington Hills Resolution identified several concerns for residents under the current pandemic restrictions imposed by the Governor’s Executive order.

One of their major concerns was the continuing decline of health care facility operations and their financial condition, beyond the care being provided to just 32 Covid patients at Good Shepherd Hospital.

There has been a flattening of the curve in the area for weeks, and Barrington Area Covid hospitalizations and deaths have been at extremely low levels.

Several trustees were concerned with the lack of preventative care and routine or elective procedures being provided, and the impact that delayed care will have on the overall health condition of thousands in the area in the future.

One trustee said that one of the reasons people live in our area is the high quality of health services which are now being jeopardized.

Although BH has few businesses, it was mentioned that many residents living in the Village are employers whose employees want to get back to work supporting their families and not having to rely government programs.

Many of the trustees shared a concern that the Governor’s metrics for complete reopening included a requirement for a vaccine, a therapeutic remedy, and/or zero Covid cases. 

This metric is unreasonable as effective vaccines may never be found,  the therapies may never be available and eliminating Covid completely, like all viruses, may take years, if ever.

The Board mentioned that the initial reasons for the lockdown made sense, based on the morbidity projections and that the objectives of the stay-at-home orders were to reduce hospitalizations so as not to overwhelm healthcare facilities and reduce preventable deaths. 

Unfortunately, the initial projections were extremely inaccurate on morbidity, and on the predicted strain on our healthcare system never occurred.


Comments

Barrington Hills Village Board Unanimously Passes Resolution to Open Village Businesses and Churches and Raises Questions About Governor’s Legal Authority — 17 Comments

  1. This really makes sense?

    The reason the initial projections were extremely inaccurate is because we locked down.

    “The Board mentioned that the initial reasons for the lockdown made sense, based on the morbidity projections and that the objectives of the stay-at-home orders were to reduce hospitalizations so as not to overwhelm healthcare facilities and reduce preventable deaths.

    Unfortunately, the initial projections were extremely inaccurate on morbidity, and on the predicted strain on our healthcare system never occurred”.

  2. The DOJ supports lawsuit against Illinois governor’s stay-at-home order extension and warns LA mayor against ‘unlawful’ idea of long-term lockdown

    The DOJ filed a statement of interest supporting Illinois Rep. Darren Bailey’s lawsuit against state Gov. JB Pritzker Friday

    Bailey filed a lawsuit in April challenging the state’s lockdown order

    He argued that the lockdown couldn’t go past the 30 days allowed by state law

    Pritzker moved the case from state to federal court on Thursday, based on Bailey’s claim that his civil rights were being violated

  3. dentbla? Do you know why? Because it was all a hoax made up to usher in their new one world order.

  4. Pay him no mind Cindy, for he is a brainwashed sychophant of the Left
    and as such he has no grasp of either the truth or reality.

  5. Dr Birx asks the CDC to investigate coronavirus hotspots LA, Chicago and Washington D.C. as new daily cases fail to fall.

    (Can Pritzker do anything right?)

    The White House coronavirus task force has asked the Centers for Disease Control to investigate new cases in Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington D.C.

    New daily coronavirus cases in the the cities are not dropping, Dr. Deborah Birx revealed Friday.

    Other hotspots such as Detroit have drastically cut their new daily cases

    Cases in Washington D.C, in particular, remain troublesome

    It has one of the highest positive testing rates in the country.

    As a result, shutdowns are continuing in D.C. suburbs even as Virginia and Maryland begin to ease their restrictions.

    Los Angeles and Chicago were named by Dr. Birx as the Department of Justice issued warnings about shutdown orders in L.A. and Chicago

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8350491/CDC-asked-investigate-ongoing-coronavirus-hotspots-Los-Angeles-Chicago-Washington-D-C.html

  6. All 3 cities have one thing in common, the residents are not known for obeying the law and are run by democrats.

    Also, shootings are up in Chicago.

  7. HonestAbe1 – I doubt “Cindy” is a real person, and is much more likely a pseudonym for Cal that he uses to post outrageous comments in order to drive readership to his blog.

    I could be wrong, but I guess we will never know for sure.

    Regardless, how can you say “Cindy” is on the Left?

    Everything “Cindy” posts is out of the extreme right-wing conspiracy theory playbook.

  8. I only post using my name and encourage others to do the same.

  9. I guess that settles whose telling the truth and whose not, M.

    BTW, Nothing in my post intimates that Cindy is Left of center.

    Your problem is (and you do have a problem) you posses zero reading comprehension.

    Now be a good little boy and troll elsewhere.

  10. So a Village Board can pass a law to open a church?

    Seems like that is not their job?

  11. Let’s outlaw the morbidly obese like Pritzka.

    Their carbon footprints are like brontosauruses of the Jurassic Age.

  12. Everything M puts out is from the Lightfoot playbook of lunacy!

  13. Interesting that the Village President, Martin J. McLaughlin, is not named in this article.

    He is running for the State Legislature to replace David Mcsweeney, who is retiring from the office.

    I note that two articles are devoted to the candidacy of a woman choosing to run as a Democrat in opposition to McLaughlin.

    McLaughlin has managed to reduce spending during his tenure as Village President of Barrington Hills, with no reductions in services.

    The ex Village President said this could not be done.

    Martin J. McLaughlin will serve his constituents and the State well.

    Maybe it’s time you acknowledge his accomplishments and his competency!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *