Comments

A Video about Covid Shot Deaths That Google Would Have Removed — 25 Comments

  1. this is bull shit I refuse to sign in to anything to view an unknown video that contains WHAT…

  2. Bill, try copying and pasting the link into a different browser. Edge opens it just fine for me.

    ==========

    https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

    There are 3 tables in the VAERS database that show adverse effects from the Covid poison. Hospitals are being told not to report adverse reactions to the database under penalty of termination or loss of medical license. Each of the 3 data sets contains a Vaers ID which will allow you to link them together in excel or access. Last time I checked there were over 14k deaths and hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions caused by mRNA injections.

    Only 2% of all reactions and deaths are reported to this government run database.

    I’ve seen enough video’s and know the real story behind mRNA and the people behind it. You don’t need to shoot this poison into your body.

    vermectin, HCQ or Remdisivir will solve your issue.

    My GP said he would refuse to prescribe a horse dewormer to me should I catch it.

    I know who NorthShore University system is now beholden to.

  3. You don’t have to sign in to anything to view videos on Rumble. It’s about autopsy results. They haven’t been doing autopsies for a few years now. (Just telling you that people died from their fake disease that NEVER existed.)

  4. Thanks Cal for showing this video. I will run a report from VAERS and report latest adverse results tomorrow.

  5. ok Maybe its just me
    but I click on the link and it says sign in to see comments
    when I do that it wants a user name etc
    wont do it

  6. whoops ok sorry

    It is me

    I took an extra stupid pill today and it just wore off

    thanks to all for the input

  7. Bill>>>>whoops ok sorry It is me I took an extra stupid pill today and it just wore off thanks to all for the input

    LOL Bill. I hope it wasn’t a CDC, FDA and Fauci approved pill otherwise you might be in trouble.

    You might want to send those to Biden to help him get thru a press conference.

  8. What is the actual and true and confirmed data showing the quantity of people in the U.S. who died only, ONLY, from the vaccinations and there was ABSOLUTELY no other factor such as being overweight, bad heart, diabetes, etc.

  9. Also, to follow up on what bred is asking, VAERS data is self-reported and unverified.

    Literally, anyone can submit a VAERS report.

    I could submit one right now, saying that my mom died from a vaccine, even though my mom is alive and well (after getting vax’d with little/no side effects, btw).

    Further, even IF someone dies (or experiences a different adverse event) after a vaccine, and is reported in VAERS, that does not mean, at all, that the person died because of the vaccine.

    It just means that a death occurred after someone received a shot.

  10. I also would really like to know how people do NOT trust the reported COVID death numbers but DO trust the VAERS data.

  11. I would add to my 9:48 comment that the data, findings, facts of deaths STRICTLY from the COVID vaccinations must be from reputable medical entities with long established records of trust and integrity.

  12. Disclaimer

    VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination.

    Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system.

    While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.

    The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases.

    This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically

    Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

    The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine.

    As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.”

    If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project.

    These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

    Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

    Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.

    Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.

    The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

    VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.

    VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

    VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS.

    Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis

    However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public.

  13. Alabama-Because it supports their arguments of stupidity.

  14. VAERS adverse reaction numbers as of yesterday.

    Note these numbers only include 2021 injectees.

    I have another file that has 2020 injectees which would cause the 62k number to go up.

    Also included in the numbers are death counts which are a small percentage.

    The numbers of death were at a high of over 13k but in the latest report run I am using they are under 1k which I find suspect.

    Finally as others have said, VAERS is a voluntary reporting tool and only 2-3% of adverse effects are reported to it.

    Dividing 62k by 2% would give you a total closer to 3.1m adverse reactions if 100% reporting was required.

    ShotType Brand Count
    COVID19 MODERNA 35,051
    COVID19 PFIZER\BIONTECH 27,085
    COVID19 UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER 62

    For naysayers about VAERS, do you trust Fauci, the CDC and FDA to tell you anything that is true?

    Include the MSM in that question as well.

  15. Alabama (Still a nitwit). NO ONE trusts the Vaers data. That’s the WHOLE point! It’s a government system set up for doctors to supply adverse reactions. No one wants to fill out the paperwork because it is so complicated and now they are being coerced to NOT file anything. The system was hugely UNDER reporting EVERYTHING as it was! It’s only like one in twelve systems that were supposedly used for adverse reactions to drugs etc. So their numbers (even though they are cooked) are HUGELY underreported. Got a clue now?

  16. Stephen I would have to find that source.

    It’s not right at my fingertips.

    Remember we are still under an EUA (BioNTech is not an approved vax since it does not even exist on the market.).

    VAERS is voluntary.

    If Big Pharma had Phase 3 clinical trials this would all be documented before the FDA approved the mRNA jabs.

    I will see if I can find it and drop it back here.

    I’ll also add 2020 adverse reactions when I have time.

  17. **NO ONE trusts the Vaers data.**

    Then please do tell why JT is using the VAERS data to try to make his point?

    **we are still under an EUA (BioNTech is not an approved vax since it does not even exist on the market.)**

    Sigh… the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine that was approved is the exact same vaccine that received an EUA.

    So you can claim that we’re still under the EUA, but the difference is semantics and not substantive.

    Also, again, the adverse events in VAERS are self-reported, voluntary, AND unverified.

    And, further, adverse events after a vaccine do not mean that they were the result of a vaccine.

    Use the data appropriately.

  18. Cindy, the kid is a complete and utter genius.

    You get it.

    Funny there are plenty adverse reactions pointed out there.

    The genius arguing back with no evidence yet he/she/it/they have time to troll a blog.

    Who owns BioNTech thru a German VC firm?

    How much did he make on a 50m investment?

    What is the name of the BioNTech mRNA jab approved as reported by the MSM you rely on for use by the FDA? hint it begins with a C.

    I will not do the research you should be doing their sport.

    Go find the reality of what I just posted.

  19. Simple-do not trust the government! (They’re here to control and extract, not to help!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *