McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Campaign Finance’

The Financial End of the GOP McHenry County Sheriff’s Race: $40,800 to $19,500 with Prim in the Lead

April 18, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Andy Zinke, Bill Prim, Campaign Finance, McHenry County Sheriff, McHenry County Sheriff's Department

Andy Zinke.  Photo courtesy of Sheriff's Department.

Andy Zinke. Photo courtesy of Sheriff’s Department.

Since Jim Harrison decided to run as an Independent, there is a two-way race for the Republican nomination for McHenry County Sheriff.

It’s between Undersheriff Andy Zinke–Sheriff Keith Nygren’s choice–and former Des Plaines Police Commander Bill Prim, who has live in Cary for the last two decades.

Zinke started the year with $21,632.70

He now has $19,545

Bill Prim speaking to fund raiser crowd.

Bill Prim speaking to fund raiser crowd.

Zinke raised $240 during the first three months of the year and spent $2,327.56.

Here’s what he spent his money on:

  • $300 – Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mchenry County for a sponsorship
  • $425.44 – On Target Range – Gunlocks
  • $240 – Rotary Club Of Woodstock, Ticket Purchase
  • $124.70 – TEC Communications, Crystal Lake – Yard Signs
  • $79.25 – TEC Communications, Envelopes
  • $300 – TEC Communications, Marketing
  • $180.72 – Think Ink Inc, Crystal Lake, Campaign Shirts

Prim, on the other had, started out with $702.85, raised $50,100 and ended up with $40,802.69.

Where did the money come from?

Part of the crowd at the Bull Valley Country Club fund raiser for Bill Prim.

Part of the crowd at the Bull Valley Country Club fund raiser for Bill Prim.

Primarily from the Bull Valley Country Club featuring Newt Gingrich.

Newt Gingrich

Newt Gingrich

  • $10,000 – Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Schaumburg
  • $5,000 – Merryman Construction, Woodstock
  • $4,000 – Gary Rabine, CEO, Rabine Group, Johnsburg
  • $2,000 – Bulk Lift International, Carpentersville
  • $2,000 – Tom Cooper, retired from Scott Forge approx 20 years ago, Wonder Lake
  • Citizens to Elect Lou Bianchi, Crystal Lake
  • $1,500 – Michael Miller, Michael, owner, M.J. Miller & Co., Barrington
  • $1,500 – Ed Zeman, President, Zeman Homes, Chicago
  • $1,000 – Joseph and Mary Alger, President, JAFrate, Crystal Lake
  • $1,000 – Lou Bianchi, McHenry County State’s Attorney, Crystal Lake
  • $1,000 – Intren, Union
  • $1,000 – Tanza Kubacki, retired, McHenry
  • $1,000 – William Lewis, CEO/self employed, Advanced Flexible Composites, Lake in the Hills
  • $1,000 – Patrice Owens-Gutiere, Director, The Advantage Group
  • $1,000 – Ray Scarpelli, Self-employed, Johnsburg
  • $1,000 – Robert Wagner, owner, Land, Air, Sea Systems, Inc, Woodstock
  • $500 – Cary Chessick, Arlington Ht
  • $500 – Paul Darley, Itasca
  • $500- Fifth District Ward Pac, Schiller Park
  • $500 – Joe Franzone, Richmond
  • $500 – Brian Furlong, Chicago
  • $500 – G3 Construction Group, Willowbrook
  • $500 – Raymond Gobberg, Cary
  • $500 – William Graham, Kenilworth
  • $500 – Keith Griffin, Mundelein
  • $500 – Robert Hanlon, Woodstock
  • $500 – Mark Herbick, Buffalo Grove
  • $500 – Blake Hobson, Lakewood
  • $500 – K-FIVE Construction, Lemont
  • $500 – Donna Kelly, McHenry
  • $500 – William Kennedy, Barrington Hills
  • $500 – Jeffrey Ladd, Jeffrey, Woodstock
  • $500 – Jerome Majewski, Crystal Lake
  • $500 – Eileen Marhoefer, Crystal Lake
  • $500 – Nicholas Mathey, Woodstock
  • $500 – Michaels Subforu, Inc, Ingleside
  • $500 – Jack Pease, McHenry
  • $500 – Jonathon Pease, McHenry
  • $500 – Plote Construction, Hoffman Estates
  • $500 – William Riordan, Glenview
  • $500 – Kevin Thompson, Gurnee
  • $300 – Richard Harris, Hinsdale
  • $300 – Ryan Laughlin, Pleasant Prairie, WI
  • $250 – Joseph Fell, Belvidere
  • $200 – Zane Seipler, Woodstock
  • $200 – Trotter and Associates, St. Charles
  • $200 – Eric Wasowicz, Palatine

$650 was unitemized by Prim like the $240 given to Zinke.

Prim gave $275 to the McHenry County Republican Central Committee, although $175 of that shows up under “expenditures,” rather than “transfers.” Zinke also gave $100 to some political committee, but did not reveal its identity.

All of Prim’s expenditures can be seen here.

The ones over $500 are

  • $1,468- Carey International, Fredrick, DE, car rental
  • $1,034.55 – Blue Soda Promo, Vernon Hills, promotional items
  • $840 – Just Buttons, Branford, CT, promotional items
  • $699 – Crystal Lake Chamber of Commerce Expo booth & State of the Community Luncheon
  • $534.07 – Eventbrite.com, San Francisco, CA, website event fees and credit card processing
  • $644.90 – 4AllPromos, Centerbrook, CT, promotional items
  • $566.07 – Tiger Direct, Hoffman Estates, computer
  • $500 – Patriots United, Woodstock, unity breakfast

Tomorrow: How is Independent Jim Harrison faring?

Chicago State Rep. LaShawn Ford Indicted for Bank Fraud in Alleged Rehab Scheme & to Pay for His 2006 Campaign

November 29, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bank Failure, Bank Fraud, Campaign Contributions, Campaign Expenditures, Campaign Finance, Fund Raising, Greg Deis, LaShawn Ford, William Ridgway

Before reading this press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office on a second inner city Democratic Party State Rep. under Federal indictment, reflect upon the 2006 date for which he is charged with using ill-gotten money to pay for campaign expenses.

And that doesn’t count the seemingly pending indictment of ex-U.S. Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr.

The crime is similar to the one that got Algonquin’s Tyvek Towers developer indicted just before Thanksgiving.

There are many indictments coming down from the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office which have crimes that date back that to 2006. Patrick Fitzgerald seems to have left a lot of unfiled cases when he retired this summer.

LASHAWN FORD, ILLINOIS STATE REP., INDICTED ON FEDERAL BANK FRAUD CHARGES RELATED TO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

State Rep. LaShawn Ford (D-Chicago)

CHICAGO — LaShawn K. Ford, an Illinois State Representative who also invested in real estate in Chicago, was indicted today on federal bank fraud and related charges for allegedly

  • fraudulently obtaining a $500,000 increase and
  • a two-year extension on a line of credit

from the failed ShoreBank and obtaining multiple advances by making false statements about his intended use of the funds.

Ford, 40, of Chicago, who operated Ford Desired Real Estate, Inc., and also invested personally in real estate, purportedly obtained bank funds to rehabilitate specific investment properties in the city, but instead used the funds to pay unrelated expenses, including,

  • car loans,
  • credit cards,
  • other mortgages held at ShoreBank,
  • payments to a casino in Hammond, Ind., and
  • for his 2006 campaign for Illinois State Representative,

the indictment alleges. The charges do not involve Ford’s position as a state legislator after he was first elected in 2006. Ford represents Illinois’ 8th House District, which includes portions of Chicago’s west side and several western suburbs in Cook County.

Ford was charged with eight counts of bank fraud and nine counts of submitting false information to the bank in a 17-count indictment returned today by a federal grand jury. Chicago-based ShoreBank failed in August 2010 and now operates as Urban Partnership Bank.

Ford will be arraigned on a later date to be determined in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

The indictment was announced by Gary S. Shapiro, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and William C. Monroe, Acting Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

According to the indictment, Ford had multiple loans with ShoreBank, including a $1 million line of credit, which he was permitted to use solely to purchase and rehabilitate investment properties. On May 22, 2006, he obtained a $500,000 increase — to $1.5 million, and a two-year extension of the credit line, allegedly by submitting false tax return documents that inflated his personal and business income.

On seven different occasions between April 2006 and March 2007, Ford applied for and obtained a total of $373,500 in advances from the credit line, allegedly by making false statements that he intended to use the funds to rehabilitate six different investment properties on the city’s west side.

In each instance, however, Ford allegedly knew that he intended to use the funds, in part, for expenses unrelated to the specific rehabilitation projects.

The indictment seeks forfeiture of approximately $832,000.

Each count of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine, and restitution is mandatory. If convicted, the Court must impose a reasonable sentence under federal sentencing statutes and the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Greg Deis and William Ridgway.

The investigation falls under the umbrella of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information on the task force, visit: www.StopFraud.gov.

An indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Walsh Criticizes Duckworth’s Missing Campaign Disclosure Filing Deadline, Cites Two Homestead Exemptions as Well

October 16, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Finance, FEC, Joe Walsh, Tammy Duckworth

A press release from Congressman Joe Walsh:

Duckworth Violates FEC Laws – Fails to Disclose by Transparency Deadline

As of the October 15 filing deadline, Tammy Duckworth had not fully disclosed her fundraising for the July through September fundraising period.

The Federal Election Commission requires all candidates’ committees disclose their fundraising activities each quarter. The Duckworth campaign instead only released their September totals without July’s and August’s activities at the deadline.

Congressman Walsh stated, “This looks to be another instance where Tammy Duckworth thinks the rules don’t apply to her.

“Whether she’s

  • unlawfully taking two homestead exemptions in Illinois while living in DC or
  • attempting to terminate whistleblowers at the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs,

Ms. Duckworth has displayed a pattern of ducking the rules.”

“When Ms. Duckworth has spent so much time campaigning against Super PACs because they lack transparency in campaign finance,” Walsh continued, “it is her campaign that was the source of mystery at the filing deadline.

“Does she believe federal election laws do not apply to her?”

Walsh concluded, “This looks like just one more of her many ‘oversights’. At the Illinois DVA, she was citied multiple times for misreporting funds by the Illinois Auditor General, including a misreporting of $4 million in grant money. Either way, Ms. Duckworth, since becoming a Blagojevich Bureaucrat, has displayed a repeated pattern of ‘misreporting’ or blatantly breaking rules.”

A shot of the FEC screen showing Duckworth did not file on time.  Click to enlarge.

This morning, the Walsh for Congress campaign filed a formal complaint with the FEC to look into the matter. A copy of the complaint can be viewed here.

Courts Force Disclosure of Tax Dollars Spent to Pass Northfield Township High School Referendum–$60,000 in 2006, Passed by 241 Votes

August 24, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bond, Bond Issue, C.O.S.T., Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Expenditures, Campaign Finance, Citizens Organized to Save the Tax Cap, Glenbrook High School District 225, Illinois State Board of Elections, Lawrence T. Miller, Northfield Township High School District No. 225, PAC, Political Action Committee, Referendum, School, School District

88,600 of these newsletter were printed. The Appellate Court ruled, “There is simply no evidence that these newsletters were exempted communications ‘made as part of a non-partisan activity designed to encourage individuals to vote or to register to vote.’”

Here is a press release explaining the successful conclusion–from a taxpayer’s point of view–of a suit to stop taxeating local governments from promoting their tax increase referendums.  Although it did not originate in McHenry County, it will affect school districts, for example, when they seek tax hikes.

C.O.S.T. & DISTRICT 225 SETTLE CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE COMPLAINT

Citizens Organized to Save the Tax-cap opposed a 2006 $94 million bond referendum proposed by Glenbrook H. S. Dist 225. At the November 7, 2006, general election, out of 31,338 votes cast, the Referendum Question was approved by a margin of 216 votes.

COST filed a complaint with the Illinois State Board of Elections charging that Dist 225 had spent public funds for campaign mailers, and should register as a political committee and file disclosure of all election spending.

The ISBE dismissed COST’s Complaint. COST successfully appealed to the Illinois Appellate Court.

In May 2009, the Illinois Appellate Court reversed the Board of Elections and unanimously ruled against the District, stating:

“Nothing in the statute (Election Code) suggests that it serves to absolutely exempt government entities from the disclosure requirements contained in the remainder of the Election Code.”

[Glenbrook High School] District 225 petitioned to the Illinois Supreme Court to overturn the Appellate Court, and the District was denied leave to appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.

COST’s Complaint was then remanded to the ISBE for Public Hearing on the charges.

As the Complaint sought transparency and disclosure of Dist 225’s referendum election spending of public funds and public resources, the parties have reached a settlement which contains that disclosure and provides that the District will publish that disclosure.

Settlement of the Complaint by District 225 and COST was approved by the State Board of Elections today.

Lawrence T. Miller, Chairman of COST said,

“Our objective in filing the Complaint, and in the appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court, was to establish that all districts using taxpayers’ money and resources for electioneering ought to be required to file spending reports just as any other group in an election campaign would.

“We think it is wrong for a government entity to spend taxpayers’ money to pass a referendum that half of those very same taxpayers opposed.”

“The School District discloses in this Settlement Agreement that they spent over $60,000 in district funds, property, and employees’ time in connection with the 2006 referendum. That’s nearly three times what the Political Committee (V.O.T.E.) supporting the Referendum spent,” said Miller.

Click on the image to see what Northfield Township High School District admitted spending on its 2006 bond referendum that barely passed.

The Settlement Proposal appears on the ISBE agenda for its August 24, 2012 meeting. The Settlement agreement, without exhibits, appears at pages 110 to 123 of the ISBE agenda.

http://www.elections.state.il.us/DocDisplay.aspx?Doc=Downloads/AboutTheBoard/PDF/08_24_12Agenda.pdf

= = = = =

You can read the settlement here.

The Board of Education members at the time were Donna Rose Torf, Skip Shein, Wayne B. Berzon, Robert A. Boron, Steve G. Hammer, William Jeffrey and Elias Metsakis.

The COST complaint alleges “that since at least September of 2006 and through the November 7, 2006, election, the District carried out a planned campaign prepared by William Blair Co.”

Sheriff Candidate Andy Zinke Opts to Delay Reporting Fundraiser Receipts

July 14, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Anne Majewski, Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Finance

Andy Zinke. Photo credit: Sheriff’s Department.

The law about campaign finance disclosure has an interesting quirk.

Campaign donations do not have to be reported until they are “deposited.”

So, if you hold a fundraiser on the last day of the reporting period, as McHenry County Sheriff aspirant Andy Zinke did on June 30th, you don’t have to report how much you raised until early October.

And, Zinke didn’t.

There are two strategies in reporting campaign finances.

One can be like State Rep. Jack Franks in that July a year year before the 2010 gubernatorial primary election.

You can show lots of money in an attempt to make others take your ambitions seriously.

That strategy didn’t work, at least in part, because about 90% of the $1.3 million Franks reported was from family and friends.

Zinke has taken what might be called the “keep ‘em guessing” approach.

One might guess that results from a lack of serious funding.

At least so far.

Or maybe he wants a $100,000 number before he makes his finances public.

If so, he would have until the end of September to solicit the money.

Reporting $4,735 at the end of June, Zinke surely is not close to that amount now.

Indeed, from April 1st through June 30th, only $240 in contributions were reported, all $150 or under.

Of course, if Zinke has no opponent, he would need no money.

That happened GOP Coroner candidate Dr. Anne Majewski.

And with a Northwest Herald giving him prominent coverage, which does not have to be reported as a contribution in-kind, maybe Zinke doesn’t need a lot of money to win the 2012 Republican primary election.

Zinke’s D-2 follows for your perusal.

Note that the information was not reported electronically. Apparently Zinke’s campaign for Sheriff hasn’t reached the contribution threshold where electronic filing is required.  Click to enlarge.

One would have thought with a fundraiser widely promoted–even though it was free for precinct committeemen and assorted others whose presence would be beneficial–that some would have paid enough in advance for the money have been deposited.

No big contribution either. They have to be reported fairly quickly.

McHenry County Republican Party Shows $7,200 in Bank

April 18, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Expenditures, Campaign Finance, Contributions, Contributors, Lincoln Day Dinner, McHenry County Repubican Central Committee, McHenry County Republican Headquarters, McHenry County Republicans

McHenry County Republicans ended up with about $2,000 more at the end of March than they had at the beginning of the year, ending March with $7,188.71.

The annual Lincoln Day Dinner was the major fund raiser and also amount to most of the expenses.

Contributions came from the following individuals:

  • $175 – Mary Alger, Crystal Lake
  • $275 – Scott Breeden. Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Michael Chmiel, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Michael Feeterer, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Shawn Green, Union
  • $175 – James Heisler, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – HR Green Company, Cedar Rapids, IA
  • $750 – Innovative Component Sales, Huntley
  • $175 – John Jung, Woodstock
  • $175 – Kathy Keefe, Woodstock
  • $200 – Diane Klemm, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Rosemary Kurtz, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Dale Lewis, Woodstock
  • $175 – Liberty Outdoor, Crystal Lake
  • $200 – Pam Palmer, Union
  • $175 – Metropolitan Health Care, Chicago
  • $250 – Peter Baker & Son, Lake Bluff
  • $175 – Pint Size Productions, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Tom Schermerhorn, Woodstock
  • $175 – Robert Stephenson, Barrington Hills
  • $750 – Trotter & Associates, St Charles
  • $175 – Marty Waitzman, Algonquin
  • $175 – Webb Marketing, McHenry
  • $175 – Tom Wilbeck, Lakewood

There were also contributions from individuals of less than $150 that amounted to $3,375.

Campaign funds made contributions of $6,160. All but $985 were disclosed, as you can see below:

  • $700 – Citizens for Karen McConnaughay, St Charles
  • $900 – Citizens for Kent Gaffney, Fox River Grove
  • $175 – Citizens for LeFew, Harvard
  • $750 – Citizens for Mark Beaubien, Barrington
  • $750 – Citizens to Elect Andy Zinke, Crystal Lake
  • $175 – Citizens to Elect Dan Duffy, Barrington
  • $1,000 – Citizens to Re Elect Bob Miller, Cary
  • $175 – Cliff Surges for State Senate, Gilberts
  • $200 – Joe Walsh For Congress, Lake Zurich
  • $175 – Jourdan Committee to Preserve and Project Good Government, McHenry
  • $175 – Skinner Campaign Fund, Crystal Lake

Here are the expenditures:

  • $6,731.62 – Lincoln Day Dinner. D’Andrea’s Banquets, Crystal Lake
  • $1,005 – Election Night Party, D’Andrea’s Banquets, Crystal Lake
  • $1,800 – Salary, Geri Davis, McHenry
  • $1,476 – Rent, Madison Corporate Group
  • $742.74 – Printing, CL Graphics 124 S Virginia
  • $452.76 – Lincoln Day Flowers, Lockers Flowers, McHenry
  • $428.33 – Withholdings, United States Department of Treasury
  • $390 – Storage Unit Rental, Liberty Outdoor, Crystal Lake
  • $350 – Accounting fees, Giloa Yapelli, Crystal Lake
  • $192.50 – AT&T, Louisville, KY

$239.78 was not specifically listed.

Potential Kane County Vendors’ Campaign Contibutions Made Public Before Approval

April 09, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Finance, Contract, Contributions, Contributors, Kane County Board, Karen McConnaughay, McHenry County Board., Vendor

Karen McConnaughay

The Kane County Chronicle had a story Saturday telling of Board Chairman (and now GOP State Senate candidate) Karen McConnaughay’s making public campaign contributions by potential contractors prior to County Board approval.

For two years, those wanting county business have had to fill out forms telling

  • owners of the company,
  • names of lobbyists who have been used, plus
  • campaign contributions to county officials

I don’t know if such information is posted on the Kane County web site, but that would be a good idea.

On additional bit of transparency might clarify zoning matters.

Might it be relevant to know whether the applicants and their attorneys had made contributions to any county officials?

Cliff Surges Questions Karen McConnaughay’s $64,000 in Union Contributions

March 06, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Finance, Cliff Surges, Contributions, Contributors, Karen McConnaughay, Union

A press release from State Senate candidate Cliff Surges criticizing his questioning his opponent Karen McConnaughay’s contributions from unions.

Surges calls on McConnaughay to explain Union Contributions

Gilberts, IL – On last Monday evening at a candidate forum at Del Webb’s Sun City in Huntley, Karen McConnaughay called herself a “union fighter” that has “stood up to unions” as Chairman of the Kane County Board. However, once again, a search of her campaign financial disclosure forms shows she has taken $64,367.00 (see attachment) from unions as campaign contributions since 2003. The source for this information is the Illinois State Board of Elections website.

In her own literature, and in the “United to Restore Freedom” candidate questionnaire, which can be found on the Illinois Review Blog, McConnaughay states she is opposed to PLA’s (Project Labor Agreements), opposes the Prevailing Wage Act, and supports right-to-work in Illinois.

Someone who is truly supporting these positions cannot justify taking such a large sum of money from labor unions.

“This contradiction of words and actions, especially concerning campaign contributions, is a repeating pattern in her history and indicative of how Ms. McConnaughay has eroded the public’s trust.” Cliff Surges stated.

“How can we trust a career politician who tells the voters what they want to hear by taking positions on public issues like these, while taking massive amounts of campaign cash from the very organizations that oppose those positions?

“Who will Ms. McConnaughay really represent if elected in Springfield, the voters or the Unions which have funded her campaigns?”

The contributions found by the Surges’ campaign follow:

These are from the Laborer's District Council gave $6,860.

The Illinois Brotherhood of Electrical Workers donated $700, the Labroer's Union Locals $2,250 and the Steel Metal Workers gave $250.

The Operating Engineers Local 150 made the above $44.808 in contributions.

The Plumbers and Pipefitters gave $6,000. All union donations totaled $64,368.

More Charges of Illegal MinorityWomen/Disadvantaged Set-Aside Scams, One Hefty Campaign Contributor

February 14, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Anthony Cappello, Brandon Fox, Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Finance, Elizabeth Perino, Margaret Schneider, McHugh Construction, Set-Aside

TWO AREA CONTRACTORS CHARGED WITH FRAUD INVOLVING MINORITY AND WOMEN SET-ASIDES FOR GOVERNMENT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

CHICAGO — Two owners of area construction businesses are facing federal charges for allegedly using companies they controlled to fraudulently obtain government contracts set-aside for owners of minority, women and disadvantaged business enterprises (M/W/DBEs). 
The charges in two separate cases made public today stem from an ongoing public corruption investigation by federal, state, and local authorities of alleged fraud by businesses falsely purporting to be minority- or women-owned, or by legitimate non-majority businesses being used as sham pass-through sub-contractors on public works projects.
In one case, the owner of two Lockport construction companies certified as woman-owned and/or disadvantaged businesses was charged with fraudulently using her companies as sham pass-through sub-contractors as part of a scheme to help prime contractors meet the City of Chicago and other local governments’ set-aside requirements for construction contracts. 
The defendant, Elizabeth Perino, owner of Perdel Contracting Company and Accurate Steel Installers, Inc., allegedly  acted as a sham pass-through on contracts with Prime Contractor A, a construction firm with billions of dollars worth of government and private contracts, as well as with the owner of Prime Contractor B, who was cooperating with law enforcement.
       
As far back as 2006, Perdel Contracting, which specializes in concrete and carpentry, and Accurate Steel (ASI) allegedly acted as sham WBE sub-contractors for Prime Contractor A on Chicago’s North Avenue bridge reconstruction project. 
In addition, Perino’s companies allegedly acted as fraudulent pass-through WBE sub-contractors for Prime Contractor A on the Red Line and Brown Line projects for the Chicago Transit Authority, and Perdel Contracting is a DBE sub-contractor on Prime Contractor A’s Wacker Drive reconstruction project.
       
Perino, 57, of Willowbrook, was charged with mail fraud in a criminal complaint that was unsealed today.  She was released on her own recognizance after appearing this morning before U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez in U.S. District Court. 
Both of her companies have been certified as a WBE and a DBE by government entities, including the City of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Transportation. 
Perino has served on IDOT’s Task Force for DBE Regulations. 
       
In the second case, Anthony Cappello, 48, of Homer Glen, the owner of Diamond Coring, Inc., a Chicago concrete sawing and drilling company, was charged with one count of mail fraud in a criminal information filed today in Federal Court. 
Cappello  allegedly obtained contracts worth more than $2.3 million by operating the Stealth Group, Inc., also known as SGI, as a fraudulently certified WBE and DBE.  He will be arraigned at a later date in U.S. District Court. 
Cappello allegedly sought millions of dollars of sub-contracts, and fraudulently obtained more than $2.3 million, from the City of Chicago, Cook County, and the State of Illinois between 1999 and 2006.

Patrick Fitzgerald

“Illegally using companies to obtain work set-aside for businesses owned by women or minorities cheats not only the governments that provide opportunities to bid on public contracts, but it also prevents legitimate minority- and women-owned businesses from competing to obtain work on such projects,” said Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.

Mr. Fitzgerald announced the charges with Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Michelle McVicker, Special Agent-in-Charge of the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General in Chicago; James Vanderberg, Special Agent-in-Charge of the U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General in Chicago; Joseph Ferguson, Inspector General for the City of Chicago; and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan.  The City of Chicago’s Department of Procurement Services assisted the investigation, which is continuing, the officials said.
United States v. Perino
The complaint alleges various instances in which Perino allegedly falsely represented to government entities that her companies were performing legitimate services on public works projects when, in fact, they were often acting only in a pass-through capacity, enabling prime and sub-contractors to secure large government contracts and avoid requirements intended to benefit women- or minority-owned and disadvantaged business enterprises. 
       
According to the complaint affidavit, Perino acted as a pass-through on contracts with Prime Contractor A by billing for work that her companies did not perform, manage or supervise.
In fact, Prime Contractor A negotiated prices with Perdel Contracting and ASI sub-contractors, determined quantity and quality of material, ordered the material, and installed the material. 
Perino and Prime Contractor A certified to the various government entities that Perino had performed work and Prime Contractor A took credit for pass-through payments made to Perino so that Prime Contractor A could meet its DBE goals.
       
The complaint charges that Perino engaged in a fraudulent scheme with an individual identified as CW1, who owns a company identified as Prime Contractor B that performs work for the City of Chicago and other government entities. 
CW1, who was cooperating with law enforcement at the time, had Prime Contractor B bid on a June 2011 city contract that required five percent WBE participation. 
At the direction of law enforcement, CW1 met with Perino to determine whether Perino would agree to use Perdel Contracting as a pass-through WBE for CW1 and Prime Contractor B’s bid on the June 2011 contract, which was worth $9 million the last time the city awarded a similar contract.
       

Perdel Contracting's logo.

Perino and Individual A, an employee of her companies, allegedly agreed to have Perdel Contracting act as a pass-through WBE by

  • performing street sweeping work normally done by Prime Contractor B by placing Prime Contractor B’s employees on its payroll to do the work;
  • using Prime Contractor B’s equipment to perform the work; entering into a sham contract to “purchase” the street sweeping equipment from Prime Contractor B;
  • titling the equipment in Perdel Contracting’s name; and
  • having a side agreement to give the equipment back to Prime Contractor B for $1 when the contract ended. 
CW1 told Perino that he listed Perdel Contracting in his bid as $225,000 WBE sub-contractor.  CW1 later told Perino that CW1 was the only bidder on the city contract.
       
In a conversation on June 27, 2011, CW1 told Perino that the city was conducting a compliance audit on a previous contract and that CW1 had to provide the city with information about MBE and WBE participation, stating that he had not met his goals. 
Two days later, CW1 met with Perino and her employee and told them that he needed to make-up approximately $140,000 in past WBE participation on the previous contract, dating back to January 2010. 
After further discussion, Perino allegedly said that CW1 would have to issue her a purchase order so Perdel Contracting could bill CW1 for past work that Perdel Contracting had never performed on the previous contract. 
Specifically, the complaint alleges that they agreed that Perdel Contracting would bill CW1 for work renting equipment to Prime Contractor B, which had never happened. 
After Prime Contractor B paid the false bill, Perino would return some of that money, creating a paper trail that would falsely show that the returned money was for the purchase of two of CW1’s street sweepers, thereby setting up the sham purchase contract that was part of the agreement to use Perdel Contracting as a pass-through WBE for Prime Contractor B’s bid on the June 2011 contract. 
The mail fraud charge alleges that on July 6 Perino sent CW1 false documents including a backdated estimate, a backdated letter of intent, a false invoice for $95,648, and a false certification of work so that Prime Contractor B could use the documents to falsely inform Chicago authorities that Perdel Contracting had provided $95,648 in equipment rentals to Prime Contractor B as of June 30, 2011, even though Perdel Contracting had not provided any such equipment.
United States v. Cappello
According to the charges, Cappello obtained certification for SGI as a WBE by falsely representing that Individual A controlled and owned SGI when she allegedly devoted only a minimal amount of time to SGI. 

Diamond Coring's web site masthead.

In reality, the information alleges, the company was operated by Cappello and another individual.  By fraudulently obtaining the certification and holding SGI out as a legitimate WBE, Cappello allegedly obtained business required by law to be set-aside for WBE businesses. 

Among the contracts that Cappello and SGI allegedly fraudulently obtained was a $1.1 million prime contract with the City of Chicago.
       
The charges allege that individuals on SGI’s payroll actually reported to Cappello and Diamond Coring. 
In addition, Diamond Coring employees were dispatched to perform work in Diamond Coring trucks bearing SGI logos to conceal the fact that SGI was not a legitimate WBE or DBE. 
As part of the scheme, Cappello allegedly caused SGI to represent that it had a business address at a location from which it never operated in order to conceal the fact that it was using Diamond Coring’s office space.
       
In both cases, the government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Brandon D. Fox and Margaret J. Schneider.
       
The mail fraud count in each case carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.  As an alternative, the Court may impose a maximum fine equal to twice the loss to any victim or twice the gain to any defendant, whichever is greater and restitution is mandatory.  If convicted, the Court must impose a reasonable sentence under federal statutes and the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.
       
The public is reminded that charging documents are not evidence of guilt.  The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to fair trials at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
= = = = =

Elizabeth Perino and her firm have made political contributions, but mainly to industry Political Action Committees.

Anthony Cappello’s Diamond Coring, on the other hand, have contributions amounting to $60,975 going back at least to 1998, when donations were made to

  • George Ryan  – $500
  • Dan Hynes  -$175

In 1999 contribution were made to

  • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $1,500
  • 45th Ward Alderman Patrick J. Levar – $1,000
  • 23rd Ward Democratic Party Organization – $1,000

In 2000, the following donations were noted:

  • Bill Lepinski’s All American Eage PAC – $1,500
  • 45th Ward Alderman Patrick J. Levar – $2,250
  • Coalition for Better Government (Ron Calicchio candidate) – $200
  • Cicero Political Action Committee – $2,000
  • 23rd Ward Democratic Party Organization – $500

In 2001, cash flowed to

  • Coalition for Better Government – $600
  • 47th Ward’s Eugene C Schulter – $200
  • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $1,500
  • 45th Ward Regular Democratic Organization – $750

In 2002,

  • Paul Vallas for Governor (before the primary) – $1,000
  • Rod Blagojevich (after the primary) – $5,000
  • 47th Ward’s Eugene C Schulter – $500
  • 33rd Ward Alderman Dick Mell – $1,500

For 2003, the numbers were

    • 47th Ward’s Eugene C Schulter – $300
    • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $750
    • 33rd Ward Regular Democratic Organization – $900
    • 45th Ward Regular Democratic Organization – $850
    • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $1,000

In 2004 there was only one contributionL

      • 14th Ward Alderman Ed Burke – $1,500

For 2005, again there was only one contriution:
9th Ward Anthony Beale – $300
Diamond Coring was more active in 2006:

  • Tom Dart – $500
  • Todd Stroger – $1,500
  • Rod Blagojevich – $5,000

In 2007, here’s what’s in the records:

  • 45th Ward Alderman Patrick J. Levar – $1,500
  • 9th Ward Anthony Beale – $500
  • 45th Ward Regular Democratic Organization – $1,000

In 2008, the numbers were

  • Joe Berrios – $500
  • Rod Blagojevich – $4,000
  • 45th Ward Alderman Patrick J. Levar – $2,550
  • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $2,800

In 2009,

  • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $500
  • 45th Ward Alderman Patrick J. Levar – $500

2010 saw the following contributions:

  • 45th Ward Alderman Patrick J. Levar – $1,000
  • In 2011, the following got contributions:
  • Gery Chico – $1,000

Only one got money in 2011:

  • 10th Ward Alderman John Pope – $8,600

Anthony Cappella also contributed from his personal check book–$5,300 in all to

  • Richard M. Daley – $1,500
  • Rod Blagojevich – $2,500
  • Hoffman Estates Mayor William McLeod – $1,000
  • IUOE Local 399 Political Education Fund – $300

Manzullo and Kinzinger Pretty Much Evenly Matched Financially

February 01, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Adam Kinzinger, Campaign Contributions, Campaign Disclosure, Campaign Expenditures, Campaign Finance, Don Manzullo, FEC

The end of year financial disclosures filed by Congressmen Don Manzullo and Adam Kinzinger are not as easy to find as I would have wished, but having found them, I conclude that the two are evenly matched as far as available funds go.

Don Manzullo's campaign fund raising and spending during the last three months of 2011

Don Manzullo

Adam Kinzinger

Manzullo reports $522,864 at the end of December, while Kinzinger had $651,089.

That gives Kinzinger a $128,000 lead, but they both appear to have enough money to make significant TV buys in the Downstate markets that cover their ring-around-the-collar counties congressional district that Illinois Democrats drew.

Manzullo raised $160,000 during the three months, while Kinzinger took in $201,000.

Kinzinger spent more than Manzullo.  The totals were $201,000 for Kinzinger to Manzullo’s $118,000.

Here's a summary of what Congressman Adam Kinzinger raised and spent during October, November and December.