McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Derrick Smith’

Kent Gaffney Reports on One-Day Session

August 18, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Derrick Smith, Kent Gaffney, Pension, Per Diem

A press release from State Rep. Kent Gaffney:

Kent Gaffney

Special Session: No Comprehensive Pension Reform, House Votes to Expel Smith

Springfield, IL… On Friday the Governor called a Special Session for lawmakers to consider pension reform to save the State’s growing pension crisis, however, no true reform was enacted.

State Representative Kent Gaffney (R-Wauconda) was disappointed with the legislation presented and voted against Senate Bill 3168 because it lacked the needed reform.

“Illinois has the worst public pension system in the nation. We need comprehensive reform that includes all of the pension systems.

“Upon becoming a lawmaker, I chose to reject a legislative pension and support reforming the pension system for all lawmakers, but a piecemeal approach to this problem is not the answer we need,” said Gaffney.

“I am calling on the Governor and Speaker Madigan to step up and show some leadership on this issue and quit playing political games.”

The bill offered Friday would have only have only reduced the state’s $83 billion unfunded pension liability by $42 to $45 million.

“I truly believe we’ve got one shot at meaningful pension reform. The bill that was dropped upon us Friday – while symbolic – would have done very little to solve our pension crisis.

‘I believe the Governor should have kept us in Springfield until we reached a compromise on real reform that would stabilize our public pension systems and protect Illinois taxpayers.”

Because the Governor called a special session rather than a regular session of the House, lawmakers were eligible to receive per idem for the day.

In an effort to save taxpayer dollars, Rep. Gaffney sent a letter to the Clerk rejecting the per diem.

In addition to pension reform, the Illinois House of Representatives voted in favor 100-6 to expel indicted State Representative Derrick Smith (D-Chicago) from the Illinois House.

Rep. Smith was arrested March 13, following an undercover investigation by the FBI; Smith now faces federal bribery charges for allegedly accepting a $7,000 cash bribe.

Rep. Gaffney voted in favor of expelling indicted State Representatives Derrick Smith.

A Repeat: Peg Breslin Last House Member Tossed Out in 1977, Appointed to Same Seat within Days

August 17, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Derrick Smith, Peg Breslin

This article was run first about two months ago, however, considering that Derrick Smith is about to be kicked out of the Illinois House, it seems appropriate to remind folks the last one to be forced from the floor.

The biography Peg Breslin posted on the Appellate Court web site. Click to enlarge.

So far I haven’t seen former State Rep. and Appellate Court Justice Peg Breslin’s name in any of the stories about the “alleged” bribe-taking State Rep. Derrick Smith.

“The last Illinois House member expelled was in 1905, when representatives voted, 121-13, to oust Frank D. Comerford. According to the allegation at the time, Comerford besmirched the good name of his colleagues by saying publicly that corruption among lawmakers was rampant,” the Associated Press reported.

in 1977 she won a House seat where she grew up.

But, at the time she ran, she was living in Chicago.

A challenge was filed to her being in the Illinois House of Representatives.

She argued she was a resident in her district because she had her meat in the freezer.

She was kicked out of the House.

A lot of us took the challenge quite seriously and were astonished to see her quickly selected by her district’s State Representative Committeemen to replace, hold on, herself.

The whole process had been a waste of time and energy.

Breslin is known as the one who sponsored the passage of the Compensation Review Board. It is a way that legislators and other elected officials can get annual pay raises unless both houses specifically reject them in language which is exactly the same.

Indeed, in the 1990′s, when Breslin came back to lobby her former colleagues for a judicial pay raise, from the podium she pointedly reminded House members that she had sponsored the law that relieved them of the need to go on the public record with a vote to increase their own salaries.

She didn’t make the “expelled” story, because she was “excluded.”

Ah, lawyers.

And she got a good pension.

Peg Breslin Last House Member Tossed Out in 1977, Appointed to Same Seat within Days

June 25, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Derrick Smith, Exclude, Expell, Peg Breslin

The biography Peg Breslin posted on the Appellate Court web site.  Click to enlarge.

So far I haven’t seen former State Rep. and Appellate Court Justice Peg Breslin’s name in any of the stories about the “alleged” bribe-taking State Rep. Derrick Smith.

“The last Illinois House member expelled was in 1905, when representatives voted, 121-13, to oust Frank D. Comerford. According to the allegation at the time, Comerford besmirched the good name of his colleagues by saying publicly that corruption among lawmakers was rampant,” the Associated Press reported.

in 1977 she won a House seat where she grew up.

But, at the time she ran, she was living in Chicago.

A challenge was filed to her being in the Illinois House of Representatives.

She argued she was a resident in her district because she had her meat in the freezer.

She was kicked out of the House.

A lot of us took the challenge quite seriously and were astonished to see her quickly selected by her district’s State Representative Committeemen to replace, hold on, herself.

The whole process had been a waste of time and energy.

Breslin is known as the one who sponsored the passage of the Compensation Review Board. It is a way that legislators and other elected officials can get annual pay raises unless both houses specifically reject them in language which is exactly the same.

Indeed, in the 1990′s, when Breslin came back to lobby her former colleagues for a judicial pay raise, from the podium she pointedly reminded House members that she had sponsored the law that relieved them of the need to go on the public record with a vote to increase their own salaries.

She didn’t make the “expelled” story, because she was “excluded.”

Ah, lawyers.

And she got a good pension.

So Much Political Corruption, People Want Resignations Before Conviction

May 09, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Arrest, Charges, Derrick Smith, Indictment, Mark Brown

Derrick Brown

That’s what people want now, according to Chicago Sun-Times columnist Mark Brown.

He uses State Rep. Derrick Smith, the Democrat appointed by Secretary of State Jesse White and political allies.

Smith was arrested for taking $7,000 in bribes.

He was subsequently indicted.

Then, because a primary opponent who used to be Executive Director of the local Republican Party was on the Democratic Party primary ballot, Democratic Party leaders urged voters to elect the alleged crook, rather than the white guy Republican.

The strategy worked.

Smith won the primary election.

Primary election results showed Derrick Smith won over 3-1.

The goal of the Dem leaders was for Smith to win nomination, but then resign.

He hasn’t done it.

Why?

Presumably he needs the month and, I understand, if convicted, he gets points for resigning from the office.

Since a trial is unlikely to be finished by the November election, Smith might even be elected.

Of course, the Illinois House could kick him out of his seat.

That’s happened before and one of these days I’ll write about it.

But, back to what stimulated this piece.

Brown writes,

“While I’m also of a mind Smith should go, it bears noting we seem to have reached a point in Illinois where innocent until proven guilty no longer applies to public officials under indictment.

“Now we clamor for their immediate removal based on the charges alone.”

Is my memory correct that the Northwest Herald called for McHenry County State’s Attorney to step down until his criminal indictment was resolved?

Second Shoe Drops on Democratic Party State Rep. Accused of Bribe-Taking

April 10, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bribe, Bribery, Derrick Smith, Greg Deis

A press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office:

STATE REP. DERRICK SMITH INDICTED ON FEDERAL BRIBERY CHARGE

Patrick Fitzgerald

CHICAGO — Illinois State Rep. Derrick Smith (10th District) was indicted today for allegedly accepting a $7,000 cash bribe to write an official letter of support for a daycare center that he believed was seeking a state grant. Smith was charged with federal bribery in a single-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury after he was initially charged in a criminal complaint and arrested on March 13, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Smith was initially charged following an FBI undercover investigation that began in December 2011. Smith and an individual identified as CS-1, who worked on Smith’s political campaigns and who, unbeknownst to Smith, was cooperating with the FBI, had numerous conversations about helping a fictional daycare owner obtain a purported state grant in exchange for $7,000, according to court documents.

On March 2, Smith allegedly provided CS-1 with an official letter of support for the daycare owner to obtain a $50,000 Early Childhood Construction Grant from the state’s Capital Development Board.

In return, during a recorded meeting on March 10, CS-1 gave Smith $7,000 cash, purportedly from the fictional daycare owner.

After he was arrested in March, Smith, 48, of Chicago, was released on his own recognizance. He will be ordered to appear for arraignment on a later date in U.S. District Court. The indictment seeks forfeiture of approximately $4,500 in unrecovered proceeds of the alleged bribe payment.

The bribery count carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine and restitution is mandatory. If convicted, the Court must impose a reasonable sentence under federal statutes and the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Deis.

The public is reminded that an indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Appointed Chicago State Rep. Derrick Smith Arrested by Feds for Accepting a Bribe

March 13, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bribe, Bribery, Bribes, Chicago, Day Care, Derrick Smith, Gregory Deis

A press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office:

(The Criminal Complaint, which really provides insight into this dark alley of Chicago politics, can be found here.)

STATE REP. DERRICK SMITH ARRESTED ON FEDERAL BRIBERY CHARGE

Derrick Smith

CHICAGO — Illinois State Rep. Derrick Smith (10th District) was arrested today on a federal bribery charge after an undercover investigation for allegedly accepting a $7,000 cash bribe to write an official letter of support for a daycare center that he believed was seeking a state grant.

Since December 2011, Smith and an individual identified as CS-1, who works on Smith’s political campaigns and who, unbeknownst to Smith, was cooperating with the FBI, had numerous conversations about helping a fictional daycare owner obtain a purported state grant in exchange for a political contribution, according to a criminal complaint unsealed after Smith’s arrest.

On March 2, Smith provided CS-1 with an official letter of support for the daycare owner to obtain a $50,000 Early Childhood Construction Grant from the state’s Capital Development Board.

In return, during a recorded meeting this past Saturday, CS-1 gave Smith $7,000 cash, purportedly from the fictional daycare owner, the complaint alleges.

Smith, 48, of Chicago, was charged with one count of accepting a bribe, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Smith will appear at 3 p.m. today before Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan in U.S. District Court.

Smith was appointed state representative for the 10th District, which covers portions of Chicago’s near west and near northwest sides, in March 2011, and is a candidate for the General Assembly seat in next week’s primary election.

According to the complaint, the FBI began receiving information concerning Smith from CS-1 in December 2011.

CS-1, who has known Smith for approximately six years, primarily distributes literature for Smith’s campaign and worked on Smith’s unsuccessful 2010 campaign for Cook County Commissioner.

CS-1 told agents that almost immediately following Smith’s appointment as a state representative,
grant, which would be used to pay CS-1 for his/her campaign work. In turn, Smith would take a “fee” for approving the grant, but CS-1 declined the offer.

CS-1 further told agents that since his appointment Smith has talked about his need for assistance in campaign fund-raising, and told CS-1 last fall that he wanted donations in the range of $5,000 to $7,000.

CS-1 said Smith stated that he was willing to accommodate donors’ requests so long as they were reasonable.

Acting in coordination with law enforcement, CS-1 met with Smith in December 2011 and told Smith that CS-1 knew a woman who was the owner and a silent partner in a local daycare center, who might be willing to contribute to Smith’s campaign.

CS-1 told Smith that the daycare needed repairs and the owner might be looking for a state grant.

According to CS-1, Smith said he would help the daycare owner with obtaining a state grant in return for a $5,000 political contribution. Later, Smith told CS-1 that if the daycare owner was “legitimate,” she could come up with a $7,000 contribution.

Derick Smith is being opposed by Tom Swiss, the former Executive Director of the Chicago Republican Party, and Vetress Boyce. There is no Republican in the contest.

The complaint affidavit states that the daycare owner was, in fact, fictional, and the daycare center, while a real business, was not applying for a state grant, nor was it seeking to bribe Smith. The Capital Development Board administers an Early Childhood Construction Grant program, which provides funds to assist early childhood centers with the renovation and expansion of their facilities.

The complaint alleges that during multiple consensually recorded in-person meetings and telephone calls since Jan. 24, 2012, Smith agreed to write a letter of support for the purported grant application in exchange for a $7,000 bribe.

On Jan. 26, Smith and CS-1 toured the daycare facility and Smith was given information about its purported expansion plans.
Throughout February, Smith and CS-1 had multiple conversations in which CS-1 told Smith that the daycare was applying for an Early Childhood Construction Grant, and confirming that Smith would provide a letter of support in exchange for the daycare owner’s payment of $7,000.

On Feb. 28, Smith directed CS-1 to have the daycare owner draft a letter for Smith to sign, adding that his office would fix it with the correct language.

Later that day, law enforcement sent a draft letter of support to Smith’s office via email. On Feb. 29, a campaign worker in Smith’s office requested additional information to include in the letter, and after receiving a second draft from law enforcement, replied that it would be ready the next day.

On March 2, CS-1 retrieved the letter, which was written on Smith’s official letterhead and was addressed to the Illinois Capital Development Board.. The letter stated in part:

“As a State Representative for the West Humboldt Park neighborhood, I support [Daycare Owner’s purported organization] in their application for a $50,000 Early Childhood Construction Grant from the Illinois Capital Development Board.”

Between March 2 and March 8, Smith and CS-1 discussed how Smith wanted to receive the $7,000 from the daycare owner, and Smith rejected payment by cashier’s check because he didn’t want any trace of the money. Ultimately, Smith allegedly told CS-1 that he wanted the $7,000 in cash, and agreed to give CS-1 $2,000 for arranging the deal.
J
ust before 3 p.m. on Saturday (March 10), CS-1 met with Smith in Smith’s vehicle and CS-1 counted out the $7,000 – all in $100 bills – for Smith during their recorded meeting.

The next day, Smith called CS-1 and told CS-1 to meet him in his car in an alley behind CS-1′s residence, and according to CS-1, Smith gave CS-1 $1,000 in cash, consisting of $20 and $50 bills, which CS-1 gave to agents.

In a subsequent phone call on Sunday, Smith said he would pay CS-1 the remaining $1,000 later by check.

The bribery charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine and restitution is mandatory. If convicted, the Court must impose a reasonable sentence under federal statutes and the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Deis.

The public is reminded that a complaint contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.