McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Green Party’

Illinois Green Party View on Fracking

March 07, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Fracking, Green Party, Natural Gas, Pat Quinn, Rich Whitney

While the price of natural gas has decreased enough as a result of fracking, the Illinois Green Party is opposing expansion in Illinois. While this is a Southern Illinois issue, I thought those of us in Northern Illinois who have benefited economically from the process might be interested in this viewpoint of the fight.

ILGP TO QUINN: YOU CAN’T FRACK YOUR WAY OUT OF A BUDGET CRISIS

Greens to participate in March 12 lobby day to support fracking moratorium bill (SB1418)

Green Party leaders blasted Gov. Quinn’s claim, in his annual budget address, that hydraulic fracturing — or fracking — “is coming to Illinois,” as if it were inevitable, disrespecting the efforts of thousands of activists and concerned citizens struggling to prevent fracking operations here.

Quinn repeated the falsehood that a fracking bill now before the General Assembly (HB 2615) would create “the strongest environmental regulations in the nation,” and touted it as a jobs bill and source of revenue, with “the potential to create thousands of jobs in Downstate Illinois.”

“Illinois officials are promoting fracking as a solution to the state’s financial crisis, but this type of short-term thinking is what got us into the mess to start with,” said Illinois Green Party Secretary Vito Mastrangelo, one of a number of Green Party members in SAFE (Southern Illinoisans Against Fracturing Our Environment).

“The government is desperate for the fracking revenue but does not account for all the costs:

  • the increased medical costs from the adverse health effects – both short-term and long-term – that will result from the pollution of our air, water, and soil
  • the extraordinary wear and tear on infrastructure
  • the increased cost for scarce water in periods of drought
  • the costs to clean up the soil and water contamination when (not if) it happens.

And to frack in disregard of geologists’ warning of an overdue major earthquake in Southern Illinois is downright reckless.”

“Quinn sometimes likes to posture as being a ‘green’ governor, claiming to be supportive of environmental measures and clean energy,” added Illinois Green Party Vice Chair Gini Lester.

“But in coming out in favor of fracking, and supposing that regulations can adequately protect our air, water and land, Quinn is ‘green’ only in the sense of ‘naive.’

‘With current technology, fracking is inherently unpredictable and unsafe.

“The only responsible course is to ban the practice, or at least enact a moratorium unless and until the energy corporations can demonstrate that all serious risks have been eliminated.”

While Quinn touts the proposed regulations as adequate to protect public and environmental health, his new budget cuts appropriations for the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Along with SAFE, Illinois Greens support a moratorium in Illinois rather than the seriously flawed regulatory bill, and will be participating in a lobby day at the State Capitol on March 12th in support of a moratorium bill (SB 1418).

Illinois Greens also blasted Quinn’s budget proposal as a whole.

Despite prior claims to be “the education governor,” his proposal imposes huge cuts in appropriations to public education, including every public university in the state.

The basic theme of Quinn’s address was that the State’s ongoing pension crisis makes regrettable sacrifices necessary, and that, until pension reform is enacted, the best that can be done is to save some programs and accept painful cuts in others.

Illinois Greens challenge this premise.

Rich Whitney

Rich Whitney

“Governor Quinn is correct in recognizing that the unfunded pension crisis is a millstone around the neck of our State government,” stated Illinois Green Party Chairperson Rich Whitney.

“He even correctly acknowledged that one cause of the problem was the bi-partisan failure of past governors and General Assemblies to adequately fund the system.

“But now his only ‘solution’ – other than illusory gimmicks like more gambling – is to make educators, other public sector workers, retirees, students and all of us who depend on public services bear all the painful consequences.

“Short of outright union-busting, Quinn is the Democratic version of Scott Walker.”

“Quinn’s proposals are utterly reprehensible when you consider that there are common-sense public policy solutions to both the budget crisis and the pension crisis that neither the Democratic nor the Republican leadership see fit to mention.

“For example, another major cause of the pension crisis is Wall Street speculation, which led to a collapse in the trust funds in 2008. Yet we don’t make the big financial speculators pay their fair share of tax revenues. Working people pay sales taxes of 6 percent or more on necessary consumer goods. A much smaller tax on speculative trading could play a major role in restoring fiscal health to our state government.”

Whitney pointed out that a Speculation Sales Tax on trades at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Chicago Board Options Exchange, of just $1 on every contract traded, would generate over $6 billion for the Illinois budget, based on trading volume in 2010 and 2011.

The Illinois Green Party advocates other policies that could help balance the State’s budget and adequately fund its pension system, education and social services without imposing austerity on the people.

These include instituting a fee-and-dividend system on greenhouse gas emissions, the creation of a state-administered public bank, and measures to make the Illinois tax system more progressive.

Correction: Woodstock’s Frank Wedig NOT Leaving Green Party, but Running for Dorr Township Trustee

November 28, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Democratic Party, Dorr Township, Frank Wedig, Green Party, Mike Bissett, Primary Election, Republican Party

Frank Wedig

When I asked who was running for what in Dorr Township, I failed to ask if all the Trustee candidates were running as Republicans.

My mind was so fixated on the Republican primaries in the townships with over 15,000 population that I forgot that the Green Party could hold a primary, too.

That’s because it is an “Established Party” as a result of having received over 5% of the vote when Gus Philpott ran as its candidate for McHenry County Sheriff two years ago.

And, that is exactly what is happening.

Former County Board candidate and Dorr Township Trustee candidate Frank Wedig is running in the Green Party primary for Trustee.

My manual addition of Wedig’s 2012 County Board results shows his getting 2,192 Dorr Township votes.

That’s a lot more than the 837 he received for Township Trustee in 2009.

He lost that race to Joe Evanoff by 158 votes, as you can see lower in this article.

Frank Wedig’s votes for a District 5 County Board seat in November of 2012. He ran as the Green Party candidate.

Compare his support in the high-turnout Presidential Election with the 2009 low-turnout local election. Below are the 2009 results for Dorr Township Trustee:

The results in 2009 when Green Party candidate Frank Wedig ran against four Republicans for Dorr Township Trustee. Click to enlarge.

To put Wedig’s potential regional strength in perspective, you can see the final District 5 County Board results for 2012 below:

The final election results for McHenry County Board in District 5 shows that the Green Party will have “Established Party” status in the next election.

Democratic Party Chairman Mike Bissett has informed me that Democrats will caucus candidates in Dorr Township.

Dorr Township Republicans Face Township Trustee Contest

November 27, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Dorr Township, Frank Wedig, Green Party, Primary Election, Republican Primary Election

There will be no primary election for the main Dorr Township offices as the following face no challenger:

  • Supervisor Bob Pierce
  • Assessor Veronica Myers
  • Road Commissioner Tom thurman
  • Clerk Quinn Keefe

But for the four Township Trustee spots, six people filed for office:

  • John Sheahan
  • Mark Andersen
  • Christian Cantwell
  • Joseph Evanoff
  • John K. Fuhler

= = = = = Correction = = = = =

Due to not asking enough questions, I thought that Green Party Chairman Frank Wedig was running in the GOP Primary.  I put that into the original headline from which it has now been removed.  He is again running for Township Trustee on the Green Party ticket.

“I ran for Dorr Trustee four years ago and if my memory is correct, I was some 90 votes short of getting elected,” Wedig emailed me.  “I received some 500 votes.”

= = = = = Correction = = = = =

Andersen, Cantwell, Evanoff and Sheahan are the incumbent Trustees, but my guess is that Wedig has done the most campaigning in Dorr Township.

My manual addition of Wedig’s County Board results shows him getting 2,192 Dorr Township votes.

Frank Wedig’s votes for a District 5 County Board seat in November of 2012. He ran as the Green Party candidate.

To put Wedig’s potential strength in perspective, you can see the final District 5 County Board results below:

The final election results for McHenry County Board in District 5.

Wedig is the second high-profile Green Party candidate to leave the Third Party movement.

The first was Scott Summers. He ran as a Democrat in District 6 and placed sixth with four to be elected.

Green Party Candidate Frank Wedig Files for County Board in District 5

December 03, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Frank Wedig, Green Party, McHenry County Board.

A statement of candidacy from Green Party County Board candidate Frank Wedig:

Frank Wedig

My name is Frank Wedig and I am running for McHenry County Board in district 5.My wife, Jeanne, and I have been residents of Woodstock since 1990. I received my B.A. from Illinois Benedictine College in Lisle and my M.B.A. from Northern Illinois University in DeKalb. I work for American Airlines at O’Hare Airport.

McHenry County can no longer afford business as usual.

The “build it, build anything, and they will come” approach is not economically, nor environmentally sustainable.

The county economy needs to diversify, away from an excessive reliance on residential real estate. In many surveys, residents valued open space but the Board continues to approve most zoning changes, often ignoring staff recommendation.

Our county has a natural advantage in agriculture which has been undervalued. High soil quality combined with access to a large population makes food production a logical choice for economic activity. Food transportation costs will only increase. I also strongly believe that food production is a national security issue. Water quality and supply need to be addressed. McHenry County will not receive Lake Michigan water and must rely on local sources.

The Board seems out of touch with economic conditions: they have awarded themselves overly-generous compensation packages. The private sector has been forced to become more efficient, but the County Board continues to have more members per capita than surrounding counties.

I advocate single member districts, and would reduce the size of the Board significantly.

The Board will have to make difficult budget cuts and the process must be transparent and inclusive. I favor a Transparency and Disclosure Policy like the one promoted by The Illinois Policy Institute. This would give local companies the confidence that the county is a good place to conduct business. County Government should also streamline the business compliance process to assist in the creation of new businesses and keep existing business in the county.

McHenry County Board District 5 map from 2012-20.

Does Wedig have a chance?

Here are the District 5 election results from 2008 with the top two Peschke and Yensen winning:

  • Virginia Peschke – 12,361
  • Paula Yensen – 12,265
  • John Jung – 10,942
  • Frank Wedig – 3,105

The results from 2010 follow. again two to be elected:

  • John Jung – 9,201
  • Tina Hill – 7,997
  • Jim Kennedy – 5,968
  • Frank Wedig – 2,181

Both times Wedig got over 8% of the vote, which qualified the Green Party for “established” party status. That means Green Party candidates have to get very few signatures to get on the ballot.

Only three candidates have filed in District 5 so far.  Two Democrats, incumbent Paula Yensen and former Board member Jim Kennedy are expected to file Monday, the deadline.

Incumbent Virginia Peschke and GOP challenger Michael Rein are both expected to file Monday, too.

Gus Philpott Gives Green Party Power Party Status in McHenry County

November 11, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bill Scheurer, Establilshed Party, Frank Wedig, Green Party, Gus Philpott, Scott Summers

Gus Philpott

To obtain “Established” party status, one must have a candidate who receives five percent of the vote.

When Rich Whitney received about ten percent for Governor when he ran against Rod Blagojevich and Judy Baar Topinka, he allowed Green Party candidates to get on the ballot statewide with very, very few signatures.

To run for Sheriff, Gus Philpott only had to get 19 signatures.

Preliminary results show he got just over five percent of the total ballots cast for Sheriff.

Green Party candidate for Sheriff Gus Philpott got just over 5% of the vote, enough to qualify the party countywide for easy ballot access.

So, anyone wanting to run for county office, countywide or county board (see below for correction), won’t have to make a large effort to get on the ballot.

= = = = =

Correction: I thought to check this out with the State Board of Elections, but state employees didn’t work on Veterans Day.  I have now been told that only for countywide offices is the Green Party considered an “established” party.  That means county board candidates would have to gather a much larger number of signatures, except in the 5th district.

= = = = =

The problem is the Green Party has not gathered much momentum in McHenry County.

District 5 county board candidate Frank Wedig received 8.6%

Green Party candidate got 8% of the vote in 2010.

And former McHenry County College Board President Scott Summers received 4.29% in his quest for State Treasurer.

Harvard resident Scott Summers received over 4% of the vote, while his running mate for Governor only got 3.4% here.

8th District Congressional candidate received just 3% however.

But for a party to grow, one needs troops on the ground or money.

The only precinct committeemen listed in the McHenry County Yearbook are Summers and Wedig.

With the number of Environmental Defenders in McHenry County, one might have thought there was an opportunity to build a local party based on local issues, but it has not happened yet.

McHenry County Blog Photo Ends Up on Green Party Gubernatorial Candidate Rich Whitney’s Ad

October 14, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: 8th Congressional District, Bill Scheurer, Govenror, Green, Green Party, Star-105, Stew Cohen, Woodstock, Woodstock Train Station

You don’t have to play this YouTube video to see the photo I took of the Green Party’s candidate for Governor Rich Whitney, 8th Congressional District candidate Bill Scheurer and Stew Cohen of Star 105 FM Radio.  I found it on Capitol Fax Blog.

It’s from this article.  I’ll show it to you below:

Did Whitney’s people ask for permission?

Well, no.

I don’t think they even linked to the original article:

“Vote the Recumbent, Not the Incumbent”

Don;t you think they should?

= = = = =
Only 228 views of the ad when I wrote this article about 11 PM Wednesday.

Green Party Candidate for State Treasurer Wants End to Public Pensions

September 28, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: Green Party, Income Tax, Income Tax Hike, Message of the Day, Pension, Scott Summers, State Treasurer

Here is McHenry County resident Scott Summers press release outlining his plan:

“Retire public pension plans,” Treasurer Candidate Says

Winding-down process would be spread over years

Scott Summers

McHenry County, IL Sep 28, 2010 — Public pensions are in trouble.

Big trouble.

Billions of dollars owed.

Billions of dollars short.

And no politician with a plan.

Except, perhaps, for one: the Illinois Green Party candidate for state treasurer.

Scott Summers is taking a stand. He says the time has come to unwind and exit most state and municipal pension programs.

“There’s simply too much systemic risk in public pensions,” Summers explains. “For decades, governors and legislators alike have simultaneously sweetened and shorted the plans. Today, some of them are almost at the point of collapse.”

According to the nonprofit Civic Federation, Illinois state pensions are underfunded by over $60 billion. Municipal police and fire pensions also are unsound.

“We can’t go on this way,” asserts Summers, who is an attorney with a master’s degree in business.

“The time has come to retire – yes, retire – the pension plans.”

“Let’s be very clear. I’m not talking about repudiating pensions and walking away. And I’m not talking about wholesale liquidation, either.”

“We have to unwind the pensions thoughtfully and responsibly, over a period of years,” Summers continues. “I want to meet our obligations as best we can, while simultaneously protecting taxpayers from the enormous financial liabilities we presently face due to past mistakes and mismanagement.”

Summers suggests approaches which are, at once, measured and nuanced. They include:

  • Working with the federal government to move some beneficiaries into the Social Security system (as part of national public pension reform legislation)
  • Moving some public plans and beneficiaries into “limited liquidation”, in the style of programs currently administered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
  • Making retirement benefits portable for some current workers, and directing accruals to rollover IRAs (in lieu of future pension benefits)
  • Moving some pension plan assets into trust funds for amortization and settlement, in the style of the 9/11 fund
  • Structuring disability and survivor benefits for police/fire through commercial insurance programs
  • Rehabilitating some state and municipal plans, and returning them to sound actuarial footing
  • Compelling “pay as you go” state/municipal contributions to the winding down of existing plans, in the style and frequency of payroll tax withholdings
  • Placing new hires in traditional Social Security and 401k/403b arrangements
  • Converting annual benefit increases to indexes used by the Social Security Administration
  • Levying state income taxes on pension benefits
  • Ending “highest attained salary” predicates for calculating pension benefits

“Heath care benefits for state retirees also need to be restructured,” Summers believes. He proposes a shift to high deductible major medical plans, coupled with health savings accounts (HSAs).

Summers is not dissuaded by the controversial nature of his suggestions. He expects – indeed, welcomes – litigation as a method of settling the issues.

“Distinguished lawyers differ on the constitutionality of making changes to the pensions,” he notes. “Let’s get the guidance of the courts.”

Ever a pragmatist, Summers melds courage with candor.

“What I’m suggesting is far from ideal. It’s what I call the ‘least-worst’ alternative.”

“Consider the extremes,” he continues. “Run the pensions down to nothing? Or burden all of Illinois with massive service cuts and debilitating tax increases?”

“If elected as state treasurer, I’ll strive to save what’s left. I’ll work to minimize the pain for pensioners and taxpayers alike.”

“And I’ll work as hard as I can to get us out of the public pension business. Altogether.”

ABOUT

Scott Summers is an attorney with a master’s degree in business administration. He also is an author (two books published by the American Bar Association) and former elected official (community college trustee). A longtime resident of far northern McHenry County, Summers is on the November 2010 ballot as the Green Party candidate for Illinois state treasurer. Learn more about his candidacy at www.SummersForTreasurer.org.

= = = = =
Near the bottom of Summers’ suggested reforms is a three percent pension cut for current beneficiaries. That’s what happens when one imposes a three percent income tax hike on retirement benefits.

Rich Whitney on the Issues

August 23, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: Green, Green Party, Issues, Rich Whitney, Scott Summers

Green Party candidate for Governor Rich Whitney has uploaded a long list of position statements, which I want to share with you.  You can read the answers to my questions to him when he visited Woodstock in May here.

RICH WHITNEY RELEASES POSITIONS ON TWENTY CRUCIAL ISSUES IN ILLINOIS

Carbondale, IL—Green Party gubernatorial candidate Rich Whitney today released a position briefing on 20 crucial issues in Illinois. The positions include (they follow this release):

State Budget                       Taxation                    Economy & Job Development

Education                             Public Pensions     Government/Public Sector

Gambling                              Death Penalty          Legalization of Marijuana

Conceal & Carry                 Public Safety           Campaign Finance Reform

Ethics in Government       Redistricting            Running the Executive Branch

Reproductive Rights         Immigration              LGBT Rights

Environment                        Militarism and War

Whitney poll numbers are rising in the latest Public Policy Polling that came out last week. He registered 11 percent in that poll showing Republican Bill Brady ahead of incumbent governor Pat Quinn.

Rich Whitney after getting off the train at Woodstock in May.

Rich Whitney said, “This issue briefing covers some of the most crucial issues that Illinoisans care about. For instance on the controversial issue of taxes, Whitney asserts,

“The issue is not whether we need an income tax increase; the issue is how we make our tax system fairer.”

On the issue of ethics in government, Whitney said,

“…that all non-policy-making state jobs be selected on the basis of objective criteria by an independent bureau. I also promise to appoint an Inspector General from an opposition party, to prevent and root out illegal job patronage and help remove the cloud of corruption over our state.”

On the very crucial issue of education, Whitney was forthright in stating,

“I want to go beyond the current budget dilemma and make a major public investment into education, so that we can achieve the goal of providing high quality educational opportunities for all, not only from pre-K – 12, but beyond.”

Rich Whitney makes his and the Green Party’s agenda clear in this briefing. Some items are more controversial than others, but the briefing document clearly draws a line in the sand between Whitney and the Republican and Democratic candidates for governor.

Rich Whitney is a 55-year-old civil rights and employment lawyer from Carbondale. As a lawyer, he has fought for working people who have lost their jobs or had their rights violated. A founder of the Illinois Green Party, he has long been politically active in support of the labor, health-care reform, environmental, civil rights, and peace movements. In 2006, he served as the Green Party’s first candidate for Governor, winning over 360,000 votes and making it possible for Illinois voters to have a third choice on the ballot statewide.

For candidate interview requests please contact Brandon Punke at 618-434-0046 or Doug Dobmeyer at 312-315-6887.

###

Rich Whitney on the Issues: In Brief

State Budget

Rich Whitney

The fundamental cause of our state deficit is our regressive tax system, which imposes the largest share of the tax burden on those least able to pay. We need to move toward a more progressive system by shielding lower and middle-income working people before raising the individual and corporate income tax, via a measure like HB 174 or SB 750. We also need to impose a financial transactions tax on speculative trading, which can raise billions of dollars for our schools, colleges and social services without harming genuine productive activity. I support establishing a state bank like North Dakota has had for years, which allows the state to generate income without raising additional taxes. On the spending side, I support a thorough examination or forensic audit* to eliminate spending that does not serve a legitimate public purpose.

Taxation

The issue is not whether we need an income tax increase; the issue is how we make our tax system fairer. The tax burden needs to be shifted to those most able to pay. Measures like SB 750 would raise the individual rate to 5 percent and the corporate rate to 8 percent – but would protect the bottom 60 percent of income earners from actually paying the higher tax. We also need to fund education more through the state rather than local property taxes – and provide badly needed property tax relief.  HB 174 and SB 750 include that as part of the package.

Economy and Job Opportunities

Rich Whitney

I have a comprehensive plan to meet the goal of a full employment economy. It starts with solving the budget crisis and restoring health to the public sector, especially education. A public sector that invests in people – their education, health care, infrastructure, affordable housing and affordable clean energy – is the key to creating a healthy and productive private sector. That’s why I am fighting for free higher education for Illinois residents and a single-payer universal health care system. I am fighting for a Green capital bill to promote renewable energy, with manufacturing based in Illinois, sustainable transportation, including real high-speed rail, smart urban redesign and energy efficiency. I propose to use the power of eminent domain to reclaim and retool closed factories and facilities, and reopen them as community-owned or employee-owned enterprises. My state bank proposal can provide a powerful tool of monetary policy, to extend credit where it is needed to attain our economic goals.

Education

Our state Constitution makes it a fundamental obligation of government to provide quality educational opportunities to all. But our state government actually provides the lowest percentage of state support for education of any state in the U.S., and we also have among the most unequal schools in the U.S., between rich and poor districts. Our over reliance on property taxes to fund our schools is a related problem of long standing. My plans for addressing the budget crisis will not only alleviate these problems; I want to go beyond that and make a major public investment into education, so that we can achieve the goal of providing high quality educational opportunities for all, not only from pre-K – 12, but  beyond. To me it is unacceptable that in one of the wealthiest states in the wealthiest nation in the world, our schools are failing and students must incur a lifetime of debt just to obtain a college degree.  You will not find a stronger advocate for public education than Rich Whitney. Investing in our children’s education is always the very smartest thing a government can do.

Public Pensions

Rich Whitney

For years, the General Assembly and a succession of both Democratic and Republican governors deliberately under funded our public pension system because it was more convenient to do that rather than practice fiscal responsibility. Now that we have the largest unfunded pension liability in the United States, much of the corporate media in this state have taken to blaming the workers for the problem, spreading the lie that their pension benefits are too “generous,” when in fact they are extremely modest compared to other states, workers pay their fair share into the system and often lose Social Security benefits as part of the price for receiving them. In my view, this is actually part of an ongoing attack on the middle class by Wall Street and certain financial interests that have sought to undermine defined benefit pensions in favor of having workers invest their retirement funds into riskier instruments like 401(k)s.  Yes, there are some who abuse the pension plans by “gaming the system,” and that must be stopped. But the vast majority of our pensioners are just trying to enjoy their reasonable rewards after years of devoted public service. I will fight to maintain existing pension standards, not undermine them, and restore adequate and responsible funding to the system.

On the role of Government and the Public Sector

There are some forces in society today that push the view that government itself is the problem; government is bad; government is irredeemably inefficient, venal and hopeless. I disagree. What is true is that when government is under the control of big moneyed interests, multinational corporations and banks that have an agenda of undermining government, so that they themselves can reap private profits at public expense, then government can indeed be all of these things. Under the reign of the two corporate-sponsored parties, that is exactly what we have been getting. But government does not have to be any of these things. It can also be a force for the public good, when we, the people, control it. That is one of the reasons why we formed the Green Party, a party that refuses corporate campaign contributions; a party based on positive principles aimed at serving the public good. If we stop looking at government as “it,” or “them,” and start looking at it as “us”; if we take the steps needed to make it an expression of “us,” then government will indeed become a force for the public good.

Gambling

Rich Whitney

I oppose the expansion of gambling into video poker, new casinos or anything else, and will fight to repeal all state-sanctioned gambling, exempting only established river boats. Gambling is a hidden tax on the poor, the ignorant and the addiction-prone. While it has become an important source of revenue for the state, its supposed benefits are illusory when we consider that it drains disposable income from the poor and desperate that would otherwise be spent on useful commodities, and when we consider the social costs of more bankruptcies, crime, blight, domestic conflict and divorce, substance abuse, and other secondary effects. Our state government should not be promoting activities that separate low-income people from their money.

Death Penalty

I would not only extend the moratorium on the death penalty in Illinois; I would fight to repeal capital punishment altogether. A criminal justice system composed of imperfect human beings does not have the moral authority to take a human life. Experience shows that the risk of error is too great and the consequences of error too severe – and, of course, irreversible – to justify capital punishment. There is also no credible evidence that it deters violent crime. I believe the opposite is true: That when the state takes a human life, it sends a message that taking a human life is sometimes justified.

Legalization of Marijuana

Rich Whitney and Green Party candidate for State Treasurer Scott Summers.

Second Amendment/Conceal and Carry

I agree with the Supreme Court that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms. That right does have limits; the question is where to draw the line. To me it should be absolute in the home, except for those who have waived their rights by committing a violent offense. I support right to carry for persons who can pass a high threshold of testing for gun proficiency, safety and knowledge of acceptable use for self-defense. But I also support the right of counties to opt out of such a statewide system. If we are serious about addressing gun violence, the focus should not be on limiting the rights of law-abiding people to bear arms; it should be on the unscrupulous and unlawful trafficking of arms by some gun merchants, and more importantly, on the root causes of violence – unemployment, poverty, homelessness, failing schools and failing families,  child abuse and neglect. No policy on guns will solve the problem of violent crime as long as these scourges remain.

Public Safety

Public safety, like education, health care and infrastructure, is one of those core functions of government that must be maintained as a cost of civilization. Yet in Illinois, it may become yet another victim of our broken tax and budget system, as even our State Police are being threatened with budget cuts. This is unacceptable – and yet another reason to vote for the only candidate who actually has a plan to fix the problem.

Campaign Finance Reform

Scott Summers and Rich Whitney start their ride from the Woodstock Metra Station to see Woodstock's windmill.

Our elections should be clean, fair to all candidates, informative, accurate, and reflective of the public will, not the power of big money. I support public financing of elections for those who achieve a certain threshold of small donations (like the system in Maine). I favor a ban on “soft money” contributions, more stringent campaign finance limits on donations in Illinois, and limits on the transfer of funds from party leadership to candidates. I also favor a ban on corporate campaign contributions in Illinois. Despite the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United case, we can effectively bar corporate interference in the political process by reinvigorating our corporate chartering laws, and imposing a new requirement: That corporations shall not be chartered, nor foreign corporations allowed to do business in Illinois, unless they agree not to engage in speech aimed at influencing its officeholders or candidates, or provide monetary support to any organization that aims to influence officeholders or candidates.

Ethics in Government

As an attorney, I have combated illegal job patronage. As your next governor, I pledge to vigorously enforce the rules of the Rutan decision, that all non-policy-making state jobs be selected on the basis of objective criteria by an independent bureau. I also promise to appoint an Inspector General from an opposition party, to prevent and root out illegal job patronage and help remove the cloud of corruption over our state. I will also fight to create an independent Citizens’ Budget Review Commission, which will conduct a forensic audit of our operating and capital budgets, armed with the authority to subpoena witnesses and documents, to ferret out wasteful pork spending, ghost jobs, inefficient practices and expenditures – and any spending that does not serve a legitimate public purpose. I will fight to end “pay-for-play” in Illinois by banning campaign contributions from state contractors, their owners and officers — and barring the awarding of contracts to any company whose owners or officers had made such a contribution to an incumbent. Contracts should be awarded on the basis of merit, with consideration given to historically disadvantaged groups and under-served communities. I will also look to the recommendations of the Illinois Reform Commission and the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform for further guidance on ethics and campaign finance reform.

Redistricting

I supported the Fair Map Amendment. In lieu of that, the best thing that Illinoisans can do to ensure a fair, rational result is to elect myself and my fellow Green candidates who are running for the General Assembly. We have no vested interest in incumbency to protect; our sole interest is in having more competitive elections, and in having districts that make sense — geographically, socially and economically.

Who Will Run the Executive Branch under the Whitney Administration?

In Illinois, we have a number of very dedicated and knowledgeable citizens groups that have come up with many of the public policy ideas that I am fighting for in this campaign: The Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, Voices for Illinois Children, Health-Care for All Illinois, the Illinois Stewardship Alliance, Transition Towns, the Midwest High-Speed Rail Association, the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform and the Illinois Ballot Integrity Project – just to name a few. There are also the hundreds of organizations in coalitions such as the Responsible Budget Coalition, the Illinois Environmental Council and the Illinois Coalition for Peace, Justice and the Environment. Both inside and outside Illinois, we have tremendous talent and great public policy minds in the Green Party and in other progressive organizations. I intend to tap into that tremendous body of talent in staffing the top, policy-making positions of a Whitney administration.

But I would not rely on that body alone. The smartest course would be to blend the talents of such creative and innovative thinkers with the underutilized talents of our many genuine career public servants, Democratic, Republican and independent, who have already been carrying out the actual work of providing public services for years. In every agency we have these unsung heroes of government, the people who have been performing their duties conscientiously and admirably, laboring under political appointees of both Democratic and Republican administrations. These are the people who know how to get things done, despite bureaucratic obstacles and political agendas that can get in the way. If elected, I will seek out the best of these career public servants and give them an opportunity to actually administer the agencies that they have served for so long. Good creative and innovative public policy ideas have to be meshed with the nuts-and-bolts of providing public service if they are to become effective. My approach will be to locate the best people representing each kind of talent – and build teams that can best put our sound public policy ideas into practice.

Reproductive Rights

It is difficult to persuade some people of this but there is common ground on the abortion issue. Even the most ardent pro-choice advocate understands that it is desirable to reduce the frequency of abortion, and that should be the unifying goal. I favor creating a full employment economy, the fullest educational opportunities for all, including age-appropriate sex education and parental education, to build strong cohesive families and an environment where women are better enabled to afford to raise children — which will do more to reduce the incidence of abortion than any legislative restrictions. Criminalizing abortion will do little to reduce its frequency; it will only drive it underground again, with unacceptable consequences. Therefore, I do not support additional legal limitations on abortion. I support the Roe v. Wade framework.

Immigration

When jobs are scarce, many unemployed or underemployed workers understandably tend to blame other workers who are competing for the scarce jobs, instead of directing their anger and frustration at the institutions and policies that caused jobs to be so scarce in the first place. Instead of demonizing or scapegoating undocumented workers, we need to make the pathways to legalization much easier, so that immigrants can openly organize, join the struggle for living wage jobs, and make it easier to enforce our labor laws. We also need to address the real causes of the flow of undocumented workers to the United States: Our agribusiness policies that have ruined many of Mexico’s farmers, and so-called free trade policies like NAFTA that have harmed both nations’ economies. We need to recognize that, in the long run, immigrants have always generated more new business and net gains in jobs. We need to recognize that the corporate media spread a lot of disinformation about immigrants, and that the truth is that undocumented workers typically pay more in taxes than they ever receive in government benefits.

As Governor, my focus will be on creating the kind of healthy, productive economy that will provide quality jobs for all. I will not support an Arizona-type law. I will not allow State workers to participate in police state tactics or racial profiling. I will not blame, criminalize or persecute the victims of a failed national policy but will support Green Party candidates for federal office, who can best address that failed national policy. I will vigorously enforce our labor laws, to halt the extreme exploitation of immigrant workers and put an end to the practices that allow one group of workers to undermine another, to the detriment of all. I will work to build an efficient public sector, adequately and fairly funded, that can deliver quality services and educational opportunities to all – so that all have an equal opportunity to succeed by contributing to society.

LGBT Rights

My position on the rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, and Transgender persons, and persons of other “unconventional” sexual orientations (queer-identity, intersex, polyamorous and others) can be summarized very succinctly: I stand for equal protection under the law, equal rights in society and the workplace, and for embracing diversity. All persons, regardless of sexual orientation, must be accorded the same rights and the same opportunities to participate fully in all aspects of the life of society. This includes equal rights to employment opportunities, educational opportunities, health care and more. It includes the right to go to a senior prom with a same-sex partner and the right to serve in the military or other branches of government. It includes the right to marry, a current major focus of the LGBT rights movement. We as a society need to recognize the truth that there is great breadth in human nature, human experience and human relations. We need to learn to cherish the freedom and richness it brings to our culture.

Environment

Global warming is a disaster already in progress. Other threats, from coal-fired power plants that literally kill thousands of people each year from pollutants, to more insidious threats from nuclear power plants, endocrine disrupters, GMO foods and more, demand rapid and decisive action. Before adopting a policy or position on any issue, we must always consider and weigh the environmental impact. Beyond that, we need to proactively and aggressively promote renewable energy production, energy efficiency, sustainable transportation including real high-speed rail, smart urban planning and redesign, local food production for local use, tough action to control pollutants, a fee-and-dividend system to combat global warming – and adoption of the precautionary principle (until it’s proven safe, don’t put it into the environment) as an operating principle of our public policy. For a genuine Green future, including the new Green jobs that everyone is talking about, we need to get real Greens elected to office!

Militarism and War

Although militarism and war are national issues, they have a tremendous impact on our state. We have lost dozens of National Guardsmen in both the Iraq and Afghan occupations, and countless wounded, both physically and mentally. The economic costs are also unacceptable. With 4.5 percent of the world’s population, we spend more on the military than the rest of the world combined. Every dollar spent represents money taken away from our schools, social services, health care, infrastructure and other pressing social needs. Our state’s share of tax revenue on the Iraq and Afghan occupations alone now stands at about $59 billion, enough money to eliminate our state deficit 4-1/2 times over.

Aggressive war and occupation of other nations is plainly unjustifiable and immoral. It has brought with it the evils of war crimes against civilians, torture, radioactive contamination and environmental destruction, the creation of millions of refugees, and other massive human suffering. It is also illegal. Any Presidential order to commit more troops to Afghanistan or Iraq violates international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, the Geneva Conventions, the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and international agreements dealing with the suppression and control of terrorism. Accordingly, if elected Governor of Illinois, I would honor my commitment to the Constitution and established international law, and assert the Governor’s right to veto any mobilization of the Illinois National Guard for service in Iraq or Afghanistan. I will take on the federal government on this issue. The peace movement, long ignored, but representing the wishes of most Americans, has a candidate in the Governor’s race.

  • A forensic audit is a thorough examination of income and expenditures, gathering evidence that could be used in court, to identify fraud and misappropriations. I propose to expand the concept with respect to the budget, to include appropriations that were made for purposes of rewarding political friends or that do not serve a legitimate public purpose.

Harvard Lawyer Scott Summers, Green Candidate for State Treasurer, Suggests “Moth Balling” Two Public Law Schools

August 12, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: Attorney, Green Party, Law School, Lawyer, Northern Illinois University, Scott Summers, Southern Illinois University, Third Party, Unemployed, Unemployment, University of Illinois

Third party candidates in American politics are famous for injecting new ideas into the governmental arena. They usually don’t get elected, but the power party candidates pick up on them and sometimes they get enacted.

Former McHenry County College Board President Scott Summers is suggesting the aging of Illinois suggests it is time to “moth ball” universities or parts of them.

He is not so crass as to make the suggestion that I would, that is, the primary purpose of most public institutions is to provide jobs, but he’s skating close to that assertion.

The following blog post by the Libertarian Party candidate for State Treasurer stimulated the Daily Herald’s story to write a story yesterday on Summer’s suggestion that it is time to close two law schools.

Summers graduated from one of the law schools he wants to close.

These are dark days for governance in Illinois.

Shrinking revenues.  Monster deficits.  Mountains of unpaid bills.    Political paralysis.

But even in these difficult times, we must pull together and plan for our future.

For perhaps the first time since the Great Depression, we face a period of contraction — not expansion — in public services.

We must be courageous enough — and shrewd enough — to plan accordingly for our state’s governance.

Apart from our dire finances — let’s begin by considering Illinois demographics with the broadest of brushstrokes.

Our statewide population is creeping up, but not by much.

Were it not for immigration, we’d be a net outflow state.

We’re also steadily graying: young adults in particular seem to be moving away.

Accordingly, consider — as the tiniest of sketches — higher education.

Scott Summers

If the population of traditionally college-aged young people is static or even seems likely to shrink — then can we really afford all of our public universities going forward?

In other words — has the time come to (gasp!) slim down or even (gasp! gag!) mothball one or more of our universities?

There’s a subset to this, too.

Can we continue to afford some of the programs our universities offer?

For example, we have three public law schools

  • University of Illinois (U of I),
  • Southern Illinois University (SIU), and
  • Northern Illinois University (NIU).

And we have a glut of unemployed lawyers.

Has the time finally come to slim down to just U of I for public law?

(Full disclosure: I’m an NIU law graduate. And I remain very grateful for the tip-top legal education I received there. Personally, I’d hate to see the place close. But I’m counting beans today, not wallowing in sentiment.)

Ditto medical schools.

  • U of I has four campuses and additional satellites.
  • SIU has two campuses.

They do wonderful work.

They are cherished assets of their host communities. But — but — but — can we afford them all?

So how do we make these horribly difficult — and, I freely admit, politically dead-on-arrival (at least for the present) — public policy choices?

We have to develop assessment and implementation mechanisms where we carefully evaluate our public needs — and then collectively/figuratively hold hands and jump.

Remember the military base closure commissions?

The Pentagon has gone through several iterations with these.

The blue ribbon types come in and do the meticulous analysis, and then Congress goes with a straight up-or-down vote on a recommended list.

There is anguish,
there is pain,
there is inequity,
there is dysfunction,
there is dislocation,
there is wailing,
there is gnashing of teeth —
but the bases get closed in stages, and life goes on.

So back to the higher ed example.

The General Assembly establishes something akin to a base closure commission.

There’s analysis. There are hearings. A set of recommendations is presented. And ideally (ideally!) the members of the General Assembly hold hands and jump — excruciatingly painful as that surely will be.

I could go on with other examples — but you get my drift.

Yes, the time has come. Call it — “Rightsizing Illinois”.

Our political leaders — and yes, we Illinoisans — need to team up and get it done.

Cherokee Tribal Council of Illinois Endorses Scott Summers

August 10, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: Charlie Howe, Cherokee Tribal Council of Illinois, Endorsement, Green Party, Rich Whitney, Scott Summers

Scott Summers and Rich Whitney leaving the Woodstock Metra station for a ride to Other World Computing's wind mill.

I didn’t even know there were Cherokees in Illinois, but the Green Party has found it and convinced them to endorse its slate.

And, since Scott Summers of Harvard, former McHenry County College Board President, is on the slate, he got endorsed along with Rich Whitney, who campaigned in McHenry County earlier this year.

The Cherokees are apparently in far Southern Illinois, because they also endorsed Green State Rep. candidate Charlie Howe, running in the 115th District.