McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘McHenry County’

Write-in Candidates in McHenry County’s April Elections

April 09, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Donald Duck, McHenry County, Mickey Mouse, Write-in

Vote for Donald Duck, the original angry bird.

Vote for Donald Duck, the original angry bird.

Somehow I don't think this is an official Mickey Mouse tee shirt, but I'll bet Mike Royko wold have approved.

Somehow I don’t think this is an official Mickey Mouse tee shirt.

I loved the articles that Mike Royko used to write after elections about write-in candidates.

Mickey Mouse was always got some votes but my favorite Disney character, Donald Duck, usually got fewer votes than Mickey. (Donald Duck!)

No more.

Besides the fact that Mike Royko is dead, there’s no source material on the canvass reports anymore.

So many people apparently were disenchanted with the political process that only people (REAL people, not cartoon characters) who register their intention to run are allowed to get votes.

Oh, you can write your own name in or Mickey Mouse’s and plenty of people do, but they don’t get revealed to the public.

Too much work, I suppose.

There are those who have officially registered to run as write-ins, however.

You can see their names and the offices they seek below:

Official write-in candidates for the April 9, 2013, election.

Official write-in candidates for the April 9, 2013, election.

Two villages have write-in candidates:

  • In Lakemoor, Kimberly Beach is running for Mayor.
  • In McCullom Lake, Tony Coznor is running for Village Trustee.

Leo Tibbitts, Jr., is running for Trustee in the Hebron-Alden-Greenwood Fire Protection District.

There are two library districts with write-in candidates for Trustee:

  • Monica Leccese for the McHenry Library Board
  • Susan Suchar for the Nippersink Library Board

Michele Hartwig is running for the Crystal Lake Park Board.

There are four running for school board seats as write-ins:

  • Vickie Marconi for Prairie Grove School District 46 Board
  • Mischelle Yantis for Prairie Grove School District 46 Board
  • Timothy Hying for McHenry High School District 156 Board
  • Jennifer Read for Richmond-Burton School District 157 Board

McHenry County Has More Uncontested Elections than Any Other Chicago-Area County

April 09, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Contest, Election, McHenry County

Jake Griffin of the Daily Herald did the heavy lifting on figuring out how many elections in Chicagoland are uncontested.

According to his research, McHenry County has the most.

6

Almost 65% of the elections in McHenry County are uncontested.

Lack of competition could be interpreted as meaning people are satisfied.

You can see who is running for what here on the McHenry County Clerk’s web site.

Ballot headingfor 4-9-13

Looking through the ballot, here are the elections I found as uncontested:

Municipal Office

  • Algonquin Village President and Clerk
  • Bull Valley Trustee
  • Cary Village Clerk and Trustee
  • Crystal Lake City Clerk
  • Fox River Grove Village President
  • Greenwood Village Trustee
  • Harvard City Clerk and Treasurer, Ward 2 and Ward 4 Alderman
  • Hebron Village Trustee (only two running for three spots)
  • Holiday Hills Village Clerk and Trustee
  • Huntley Village President
  • Lake in the Hills Village Clerk
  • Lakewood Village President and Trustee
  • Marengo Mayor, Clerk and Ward 3 Alderman
  • McHenry City Clerk and Ward 1 and Ward 5 Alderman
  • Oakwood Hills Village President and Trustee for two-year term (no one filed for the three 4-year terms for Trustee)
  • Port Barrington Village President and Trustee
  • Prairie Grove Village President and Trustee (only two filed for three spots)
  • Richmond Village President and Trustee
  • Spring Grove Village President and Trustee
  • Trout Valley Village Trustee
  • Union Village President and Trustee
  • Wonder Lake Village Trustee
  • Woodstock Mayor and City Council

Township Office

  • Alden Township Supervisor, Assessor, Road Commissioner and Trustee
  • Algonquin Township Officials
  • Burton Township Supervisor, Clerk, Assessor, Road Commissioner and Trustee (only two running for four spots)
  • Chemung Township Supervisor, Clerk and Assessor
  • Coral Township Supervisor, Clerk and Road Commissioner (no candidate for Assessor)
  • Dorr Township Clerk, Assessor and Highway Commissioner
  • Dunham Township Supervisor, Clerk, Road Commissioner and Trustee
  • Grafton Township Clerk
  • Greenwood Township Supervisor, Clerk, Assessor and Trustee
  • Hartland Township Supervisor, Clerk, Assessor and Trustee
  • Hebron Township Clerk, Assessor and Trustee
  • Marengo Township Assessor and Trustees
  • McHenry Township Supervisor, Clerk and Road Commissioner
  • Nunda Township Clerk, Assessor, Road Commissioner and Trustee
  • Richmond Township Clerk, Highway Commissioner and Trustee
  • Riley Township Officials
  • Seneca Township Officials

Park Districts

  • Barrington Hills Park Board
  • Crystal Lake Park District (three running for four four-year seats, none running for one two-year term)
  • Huntley Park District
  • Marengo Park District

Library Districts

  • Algonquin Area Library Board (only one running for three seats)
  • Barrington Public Library Board
  • Cary Public Public Library Board (one running for two four-year seats)
  • Fox River Grove Public Library Board (only two running for three four-year seats)
  • Johnsburg Public Library Board
  • Marengo -Union Public Library Board (one filed for two seats)
  • McHenry Public Library Board
  • Nippersink Public Library Board (three running for four vacancies for four-year term)
  • River East Public Library Board (no candidate filed for two six-year vacancies)
  • Rural Woodstock Library Board (one filed for two seats)

Schools

  • Alden-Hebron Unit District School Board (three running for four seats)
  • Carpentersville Unit School District Board
  • Crystal Lake High School Board
  • Huntley School Board
  • Marengo-Union Grade School Board
  • McHenry Grade School Board (two-year term)
  • McHenry High School Board (three running for four seats)
  • Nippersink Grade School Board
  • Richmond-Burton High School Board (no candidate for one two-year term, three candidates for four four-year terms)
  • Riley Grade School Board (three running for four seats)
  • Woodstock Unit District School Board (one year term)

Community Colleges

  • Harper Community College

Regional Boards of School Trustees

  • McHenry County (one running for three vacancies)
  • Kane County

Fire Protection Districts

  • Cary
  • Hebron-Alden-Greenwood (one running for two seats)
  • Huntley
  • Marengo
  • Richmond
  • Union
  • Wonder Lake

708 Board Giving Only 10% of Tax Money to Developmentally Disabled

April 07, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: 377 Board, 708 Board, Developmental Disabilities, McHenry County, McHenry County Mental Health Board, Pioneer Center

As I have stated since last fall, when I was McHenry County Treasurer I delivered the first checks approved by the new 708 Board.

To repeat myself, the referendum to approve the tax hike was supported by the McHenry County Association for the Retarded and the mental health advocacy group at the time.

I’m remembering that the checks I delivered were $25,000 for Pioneer Center (located then in the old Terra Cotta School) and $25,000 for Family Services down the street from now-McHenry East High School).

A 50-50 split.

Now I read in Bob McCoppin’s Chicago Tribune article that only “10 percent gotes to developmental-disabilities assistance.”

That sentence really deserves an exclamation point.

From 50-50, mental health to DD, to 10% for DD and  90% for mental health.

Talk about a governing board that has lost its way.

The folks at Pioneer Center think the answer is to pass a referendum Tuesday that will raise $9 million the first year.

The 708 Board billed $12,694,903.91 last year from property taxpayers.  (I think I overestimated the amount in previous articles at $15 million.  My apologiy.)

The 708 Board’s taxes bill more this spring.

If the 708 Board were giving DD services the 50% that I remember was the case in the late 1960′s, Pioneer Center and other agencies servicing the Developmentally Disabled would be getting about $6 million a year.

The other $700,000 ought to be enough for administration.

Actually 5% ought to be enough.

So, if DD services are now getting $1.2 million, as I deduce from the Tribune article, passage of the 377 referendum on Tuesday, would increase that amount to $9 million, plus what seems to be about today’s $1.2 million from the 708 Board.

Or, after passage, would the 708 Board forget why it was created and start giving DD services nothing?

There is an alternative.

And, maybe it will be considered if the referendum fails.

This is McHenry County Board's Public Health Committee.  Consisting of Donna Kurtz, Chairman, and members Mary McCann, Sandy Salgado,

This is McHenry County Board’s Public Health Committee. Consisting of Donna Kurtz, chairing the meeting at the head of the table, and members (from left to right) Mary McCann, Sandy Salgado, Paula Yensen and Mike Walkup.  John Hammerand is missing from the picture.

The McHenry County Board has ultimate budget power over the 708 Board.

If the County Board does not approve the 708 Board’s levy, its tax take would be zero.

So, why doesn’t the County Board set guidelines for the next levy?

Tell the Board it gets 5% for administrative expenses.

And require the grants to service agencies to be 50% to DD and 50% to mental health.

= = = = =
If you haven’t read my updated critique of the tax hikers’ deceptive robo-call, which came a second time Friday nigh, you can do so here.

In the article is the chart showing McHenry County having the 29th highest property taxes.

Not in Illinois.

In the United States of America.

Tax Hikers Call Saying Voting Yes Will Save Tax Dollars. Sure. And Glass Is as Valuable of Diamonds

April 06, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: 377, 377 Board, 708 Board, Ann Patla, DC, Developmental Disabilities, George Ryan, McHenry County, Mental Health Board, Referendum

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Editor’s note: I’m leaving this story near the top because I am so infuriated at the misleading recorded telephone call I received Friday night asking me to vote for the 10 cent per $100 of assessed valuation tax increase. I don’t mind emotional pitches, but saying voting for a tax will save us money is too, too outrageous to let pass unnoticed.

Since writing this, Fox River Grove Republican Precinct Committeeman has published the table you see below on his blog.

Look near the bottom and, then, the right hand column.

You will see residents in McHenry County are the 25th highest taxed in the whole country when taxes are compared to income.  We have the 29th highest property taxes.

McHenry County homes are the 26th highest in the country.

McHenry County homes are the 26th highest in the country.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Written Thursday night, April 4th-

Even as I was listening to the 377 Board tax hike robo-call, I couldn’t believe my ears.

Misleading at best and deliberately deceitful at worst, I concluded.

I dealt with the frustrations of parents with developmentally disabled children the entire sixteen years I served as State Representative, eight years in the 1970′s and eight years in the 1990′s.

"Vote No, Tax Referendum," reads the generic sign.

“Vote No, Tax Referendum,” reads the generic sign.

I know that the state employees union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), does everything it can to protect state employee’s jobs.

Even if it means housing DD individuals in state facilities which cost $100,000 a year per person, as the robo-caller said.

Cost-benefit analysis does not make any difference to such unions.

It certainly is cheaper, but, more importantly, more humane, to house those who cannot fully take care of themselves in neighborhood locations.

Whether it costs the small amount (which I did not jot down, but seemed low to me ) asserted in the robo-call is true or not, I do not know.

I do know it is not the job of taxpayers in McHenry County to pay for services State government should be providing.

The admonition of the robo-caller to “keep tax dollars right her in McHenry County rather than send[ing] them off to Springfield” is made of the stuff that used to be below my grandmother’s outhouse in Crumpton, Maryland.

No one is going to reduce State taxes on McHenry County residents if people vote to raise their property taxes by ten cents for every $100 of assessed valuation.

And our real estate taxes don’t get sent to Springfield.

The quoted assertion above would never hold up in an open forum.

It is too ridiculous.

It is meant to delude the–what do the pundits call them?–low information voters.

If people vote “Yes” on the 377 Board referendum, State taxes will not be cut for us.

But that is what the robo-caller wants people to believe.

Passage of the referendum will mean property taxes will be increased $9 million next year, with more to come every year thereafter.

$60 for a $200,000 home to start; $90 for a $300,000 home.

More if the real estate market increases the value of your home.

My memory of sixteen years in the Illinois General Assembly tells me that raising taxes in McHenry County for the 708 Mental Health Board encouraged Springfield decision makers to send us less than our fair share.

That’s because State bureaucrats perceived that other parts of the state without local funding needed the state subsidies more.

So, by increasing our property taxes still more for purposes for which the 708 Board funding was created, we will probably be contributing to our getting even less than comes now.

Let me give another reminder of the pushers of this tax hike with memories that do not go back to the late 1960′s when the Mental Health Board was created by referendum.

It was supported by both those seeking mental health funding and those seeking funding for those who were then called “retarded.”

As McHenry County Treasurer, when tax anticipation warrants were issued after the first tax levy was passed, I personally took $25,000 checks to both Pioneer Center, then housed in the old Terra Cotta School, and to Family Services, headquarted down the street toward the Fox River from McHenry East High School’s campus.

The 708 Board got about $15 million last year.

If half of it did not got for DD services, why did the McHenry County Board approve its budget?

The Board members certainly did not have to.

And, if this referendum fails, as I hope it will, the County Board can tell the 708 Board what type of a budget it will approve and what will be unacceptable.

By the way, I fought to shift money from such DD state institutions to community care, finally seeing Governor George Ryan’s Mental Health and DD Department Director Ann Patla, a former head of Pioneer Center, submit such a budget.

That’s the fight proponents of this referendum should be fighting…rather than trying to pry money out of our pockets.

Is DuPage County a Portent of Property Taxes to Come?

April 01, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: DuPage County, McHenry County, Property Tax, Property Tax Bill, Property Tax Cap, Real Estate Tax, Real Estate Tax Bill, Tax

This was in the Daily Herald Tuesday:

“DuPage County homeowners can expect to pay more property taxes to school districts and other local governments, even though land values continue to plummet.

“The overall value of land in DuPage decreased last year by 8 percent, to roughly $34.6 billion. At the same time, the average tax rate for the county’s 384 taxing bodies — the other half of the tax equation — increased 11.73 percent.

“As a result, property owners countywide are going to pay an average of 3.73 percent more on their tax bills this year…”

So, why does this happen?

The reason, which I have repeated pointed out, is that during the time since the Property Tax Cap took effect in the early 1990′s, real estate inflation vastly outstripped the Consumer Price Index.

Under the Tax Cap, all tax districts but Home Rule municipalities had their tax rates forced down in order to limit their tax extraction from exceeding the increase in the CPI.

That meant their tax rates were well below the maximums set by state law.

When property values started falling, the tax districts kept asking for more money.

Because they were under their maximum rates, those rates were increased enough to give them the amount they got the year before, plus whatever the Consumer Price Index (the measure of inflation used in the law) had increased.

In DuPage County’s case this past year, tax districts did what most do every year, try to squeeze every dime they can out of property owners’ pockets.

Campaign Against 377 Board Referendum

March 22, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: 377 Board, 708 Board, Andrew Gasser, McHenry County, Property Tax, Property Tax Bill, Real Estate Tax, Tax Hike

708 Board Building, the payment for which has diverted money that could have gone to services.

708 Board Building, the payment for which has diverted money that could have gone to services.

As I have reported in November, there’s an attempt to create a tax district similar to the 708 Board to serve the developmentally disabled population of McHenry County.

The problem, as I have pointed out, is that the 708 Board was created for that purpose.

How do I know?

I was County Treasurer when that referendum was passed in the late 1960′s.

It was supported by an organization that I remember being called the McHenry County Citizens for the Retarded.

When the taxes came in I took the first checks to both Pioneer Center, which was located in the old Terra Cotta School House off Route 31 and to Family Services, which was located on the street running from now-McHenry East High School to the Fox River (where the four-story city-subsidized four-story building is located).

As I remember, both those serving those then called “retarded” and those serving those with mental problems both got $25,000 checks.

The current maximum tax rate is 15 cents per $100 of Assessed Valuation.  Because of the Tax Cap that rate has been forced back to 14.5 cents per $100.  The taxes extracted last year approach $12.7 million.

The 708 Board started out giving 50% to the Developmentally Disabled side and 50% to the mental health side.

Over the years, Pioneer Center and others serving the same population have felt shortchanged.

377 adThat is the reason for the current referendum to create a special tax district to provide about two-thirds of money as the 708 Board collects. (If I am incorrect, please advise in the comment section.)

Just because the 708 Board is not living up to expectations of its responsibility of part of the population it is supposed to serve is not sufficient reason in my opinion, to vote to impose another layer of government and taxes on McHenry County.

I see Fox River Grove Republican Precinct Committeeman Andrew Gasser agrees.

His first article, “No on the 366 Board,” is unambiguous from the title on.

His second one, “The ‘Language’ of 377,” talks about who will be hurt most by permanent higher taxes.

This proposals proponents are running a virtual stealth campaign.

I found something on the internet, which I posted here.

Below is what you will see at the bottom of the ballot:

The 377 Board Ballot calling for a substantial tax increase.

The 377 Board Ballot calling for a substantial tax increase.   It looks like 10 cents per hundred dollars of assessed valuation.

The strategy of a stealth campaign, often run by school boards, is to let your supporters know and ignore the undecideds and those likely to be opposed.

Good strategy.

Elections are about differential turnout, of course.  In other words, which side can get more of its supporters to the polls.

I did find the following card supporting the tax hike:

This side of the campaign piece supporting creating of the 377 Board and its tax increase concentrates on the need.

This side of the campaign piece supporting creating of the 377 Board and its tax increase concentrates on the need.

The argument made on this side, which purports to tell the cost, but whose estimate does not match the ballot question, is that McHenry County residents should raise their taxes because State government isn't fulfilling it promises.

The argument made on this side estimates the cost at $33.33 cents per $100,000 of home value.  Virtually no one’s home is worth on ly $100,000, of course.  If one’s home were worth $300,000, it would cost $100 a year, for example.

The tax would bring in about $9 million., the proponents say.

Diane Evertsen Stops Passage of Video Gambling…for Now

March 04, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Diane Evertsen, Joe Gottemoller, Ken Koehler, Liquor and License Committee, McHenry County, McHerny County Board, Unincorporated, Video Gambling, Video Poker

Cheryl Hammerand testified against video gambling.

Cheryl Hammerand testified against video gambling.

The McHenry County Liquor and License Committee met Monday morning with an audience of liquor license holders pretty much filling the room.

According to Committee chairman Ken Koehler, there were 15 people testifying in favor of a vote on a resolution to legalize slot machines in taverns and restaurants with liquor licenses in unincorporated McHenry County.  Four were in opposition.

Four testified in favor of keeping the ban on video poker in unincorporated areas.

The argument has shifted from when the legalization was defeated 13-10-3.

Then union members were arguing that money from video gambling was necessary to fund infrastructure improvements that would provide jobs.

Those folks were not in the committee room, as far as I could tell.

Instead tavern owners attended, arguing that there was an uneven playing field in their line of work with many municipalities having approved gambling in bars that competed directly with them.

Randy Kief of Keif's Reef told of losing customers to places with video games.

Randy Kief of Keif’s Reef told of losing customers to places with video games.

Randy Kief, who owns a bar south of McHenry, gave an easy to understand example. He’s the one who presented a petition from liquor license owners, which was distributed to all County Board members.

“The problem now is the playing field is uneven.”

He told of missing two brothers, long-time customers, on Super Bowl Sunday. He discovered that they and their wives spent the day at a bar two miles away.

“The wives were playing the games while the guys were watching the game,” he related.

He added that he had heard of no problem that had been caused by the in-tavern gambling.

Another establishment owner, Tom Hensy of Horizontals Saloon, told of his business’ being “down 40% in food sales alone since December.”

He said there were “sixty establishments without gaming.”

On the other side of the argument was McHenry’s Joyce Story.

Joyce Story testifies against video gambling in unincorporated areas.

Joyce Story testifies against video gambling in unincorporated areas.

“Last year when I came before the Board, it came from a concern for my community, for our chi8ldren and the impact on their future.”

While she said she felt “bad for the people” asking for repeal of the prohibition of gambling, she argued, “It is not for the betterment of our community. It is for the detriment of our future.”

Story warned of businessmen trying to get liquor licenses just so they could get a video gaming license.

“We will have mini-casinos all over this community.

The Crystal Bowl's Jack Meyer testifies in favor of video poker.

The Crystal Bowl’s Jack Meyer testifies in favor of video poker.

“We don’t want to become another Las Vegas…It will lead to the destruction of our community.”

Jack Meyer, owner of the Crystal Bowl, told of his initial opposition to having the machines.

But he has changed his mind.

He complained about the state’s having opened up casinos.

“If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.”

When testimony was completed, County Board member Joe Gottemoller asked how many votes it would take to pass the proposal.

The answer was three. And only three of the five members were in attendance.

Bob Nowak and Sue Draffkorn were absent.

Three County Board members out of the five on the Liquor & License Committee showed up for Monday's meeting.

Three County Board members out of the five on the Liquor & License Committee showed up for Monday’s meeting.

Next Diane Evertsen spoke.

She noted that the last time the issue came up she was in the audience and heard people complaining that without video gambling customers would go to Wisconsin.

After taking a look at Wisconsin law, she concluded, ‘If there were in fact gambling in Wisconsin that was paying off, it was indeed illegal.”

Continuing on what happened the last time around, she said, “We saw the room absolutely stuffed with union members saying they would lose their homes [if video poker were not allowed.

"Two weeks later we saw those very same people across the street on strike.

"That's my soap box."

Gottemoller related that the neighbor next door when he was growing up [in LaSalle County] “had a slot machine in his home and I started using it at age 4.”

“I’m not thrilled that we’re gong to have gambling every place.

“I would at least move this forward to the County Board. If it takes three votes, it’s not going to happen today.”

“I’d say so,” Evertsen interjected.

The committee voted 3-0 to table the resolution until Monday, April 8th, at 10 AM. That is not the regular meeting date. It was set so that Chairman Koehler would be in town.

The names of those signing in can be seen below:
Video poker witnesses 3-4-13 p 1Video Poker witnesses 3-4-13 p 2

State Buys 71 Acres in Hackmatack National Wildlife Refuge

February 21, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Hackmatack Wildlife Refuge, McHenry County, Pat Quinn

Part of a press release from Governor Pat Quinn:

Governor Quinn Announces $2.8 Million to Expand Outdoor Recreation Opportunities

Photo credit:  Fish and Wildlife Service.

Photo credit: Fish and Wildlife Service.

SPRINGFIELD – February 20, 2013. Governor Pat Quinn today announced acquisition of 547 acres of public land in four Illinois counties to boost public access for hunting, fishing, wildlife viewing and outdoor recreation.

The $2.8 million in land purchases includes

  • 410 acres in Pike County, a hallowed deer hunting region, and
  • 71 acres in Hackmatack, the nation’s newest National Wildlife Refuge.

This acquisition is part of Governor Quinn’s ongoing commitment to expand and preserve Illinois’ natural resources and boost the economy.

The properties were acquired through the Illinois Open Lands Trust (OLT), which is funded by Governor Quinn’s Illinois Jobs Now! capital program and allocated for public recreation and conservation purposes.

“Preservation of open space for future generations is a worthy goal, and hunting, fishing and other forms of outdoor recreation generate billions of dollars a year in Illinois,” Governor Quinn said. “Continuing to expand outdoor recreation areas and natural habitats such as Hackmatack are not only good for our economy, but also ensure that Illinois children can enjoy nature and lead a healthy lifestyle. Let’s leave no child inside!’”

Today’s announcement includes acquisition of three other properties to expand public lands:

Hackmatack National Wildlife Refuge, McHenry County, 71.8 acres ($511,000) – The parcel was acquired to formally establish the Hackmatack National Wildlife Refuge, the first refuge established in northern Illinois.

The core areas of Hackmatack National Wildlife Refuge are rich in important natural resources, including rare and diverse natural communities, endangered and threatened species, wetlands, diverse aquatic systems and migratory birds.

Eventually, the Hackmatack Refuge will improve or restore 11,000 acres of wetlands, prairie and forest, and will conserve habitat corridors between protected parcels to ensure sustainability of local ecological systems.

= = = = =
The Fish and Wildlife Service web site for Hackmatack states,

“The first parcel of land acquired will officially establish the Refuge.”

Judge Maureen McIntyre’s 2006 Boone County Divorce Makes Front Page of Chicago Sun-Times

February 18, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Maureen McIntyre, McHenry County, R.J. Vanecko

Maureen McIntyre is undoubtedly the first McHenry County Judge to make the front page of the Chicago Sun-Times.

Maureen McIntyre is undoubtedly the first McHenry County Judge to make the front page of the Chicago Sun-Times.

By now any McHenry County lawyer with an internet connection has read the story about Maureen McIntyre’s divorce from her husband Raymond X. Henehan.

The went to law school together, fell in love and got married.

Henehan got into financial trouble, which led to his being disbarred.

The story about Judge Maureen McIntyre's divorce and husband's problems was carried on pages 2 and 3 of the Sun-Times.

The story about Judge Maureen McIntyre’s divorce and husband’s problems was carried on pages 2 and 3 of the Sun-Times.

To avoid financial disaster, it appears they divorced with McIntyre getting their Barrington Hills home and other assets. Henehan got the Cary law office, which went to settle debts…partially settle debts, that is.

The two still live together, according to the Chicago Sun-Times article by Tim Novak and Chris Fusco.

The article goes into Henehan’s mother’s running in the 1974 Democratic Party primary election against Glencoe independent Democrat Harold Katz. Katz won.

It is not hard to imagine that forces aligned with the first Mayor Richard Daley put her up to it. At the time, the article says, his mother worked for the Cook County Sheriff’s Department.

And his father worked for the Cook County Highway Department.

Page three of the Sun-Times story is packed with facts about her ex-husband's "legal mess."

Page three of the Sun-Times story is packed with facts about her ex-husband’s “legal mess.”

The Sun-Times did the story because McIntyre has been selected to try the “heater” case of Richard J. Vanecko, former Mayor Richard M. Daley’s nephew.

Would Jack Franks Run for County Board Chairman?

January 17, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: At-large, Chairman, Election, Jack Franks, McHenry County, McHenry County Board., Referendum

jack Franks

jack Franks

That might be the question being discussed by some prior to Friday morning’s vote on whether or not to put a question on the April ballot as to the direct election of the McHenry County Board Chairman.

I figured out I may have been wrong when I wrote the following about why Democrats were opposed to electing a County Board Chairman at-large yesterday:

All are Republicans [who signed the petition to call a special meeting to consider the referendum], which when one thinks about it, that probably just recognizes the lay of the political land, that is, Democrats are more likely to gain positions of power, e.g., Paul Yensen’s appointment as Chairman of the Management Services Committee, through politicking in the current system of selecting a Board Chairman than through a one-on-one fight with any Republican in a countywide contest. Both Yensen and first time Democratic Party Democratic Party Board member Nick Chirikos voted for Hill and neither showed any support for an at-large election at the Monday Management Services Committee meeting.

I wasn’t taking into consideration that Jack Franks might be interested in such a job.

I can’t think of any Democrat besides that Franks who might be able to put up a decent race.