McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘McHenry High School District 156’

Two Tax Hike Questions on Ballot of McHenry High School District 156 Taxpayers

March 26, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bond Issue, Bond Referendum, McHenry High School Board, McHenry High School District 156, Referendum

Not only does the McHenry area have a ten cents per $100 of assessed value referendum on the ballot to create a new countywide taxing district the $9 million proceeds (first year’s estimate tax take) of which will go to help developmentally disadvantaged individuals, but there’s a $2.2 million bond issue, too.

Here's the referendum question that McHenry High School District voters will face.

Here’s the referendum question that McHenry High School District voters will face.

In its February newsletter, the District explains,

“This opportunity would provide the district the ability to reinvest $2.2 million in interest savings. The savings generated will be spent on technology and necessary capital improvements, in particular, additional safety and security measures.”

Further,

“None of the money will be used for school administrator or teacher salaries. All of the money generated will be used for technology and capital improvements which include safety and security.

“If the question is unsuccessful, taxpayers who own a $200,000 home will see an average refund of $14.00 per year in the bond and interest portion of their tax bill over the next eight‐year payback period.

“If the question is successful, taxpayers will see no increase in the bond and interest portion of their tax bill.”

Details on planned expenditures can be found here.

MCC Remedial English by High School Districts

July 07, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Alden-Hebron School District 19, Alden-Hebron Unit District 19, Cary-Grove High School, Crystal Lake Central High School, Crystal Lake High School District 155, Crystal Lake South High School, English, Harvard High School, Harvard School District 50, Huntley High School, Huntley School District 158, Marengo High School, Marengo High School District 156, McHenry County College, McHenry East High School, McHenry High School District 156, Remedial, Richmond-Bruton High School, Woodstock High School, Woodstock North High School, Woodstock School District 200

Yesterday, McHenry County Blog published the percentage of incoming freshmen at McHenry County College require remedial math classes.

The best high school district was Huntley’s at 46% needing help to be able to take a college course.

Today, we look at the situation with regard to English.

It’s much better.

The average is only 11%.

So, take a look at the figures for each of the high school districts in McHenry County College District 528:
Previously, I typed out the results math results so people could find them with an internet search engine.  Today, we’ll do the same for preparation for college English, except going from best to worst.

  • Alden-Hebron – 0%
  • Richmond-Burton – 6%
  • Marengo – 8%
  • Johnsburg – 9%
  • McHenry – 11%
  • Crystal Lake, Cary-Grove – 11%
  • Woodstock – 14%
  • Huntley – 20%
  • Harvard – 38%

Again, explanations are welcomed in the comment section.

Math Problems at Local High Schools

July 06, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Alden-Hebron School District 19, Cary-Grove High School, Crystal Lake High School District 155, Harvard High School, High School, Huntley High School, Huntley School Disrict 158, Johnsburg High School, Johnsburg School District, Marengo High School, Marengo High School District 156, Math, McHenry County, McHenry County College, McHenry High School District 156, Remedial, Richmond Burton High School District 157, Woodstock High School, Woodstock School District 200

The perecentges of incoming students from each of McHenry County College's high school district who have to take remedial math.

You can see the data above.

But, just to make sure people can use a search engine to find out how well each McHenry County College high school prepares its students who attend McHenry County College in math, I’ll type the results below:

  • Harvard – 69%
  • Johnsburg – 63%
  • Woodstock – 52%
  • Richmond-Burton – 51%
  • Alden-Hebron 50%
  • Marengo – 56%
  • McHenry – 47%
  • Crystal Lake, Cary-Grove – 47%
  • Huntley – 46%

The sign on the wall inside Marengo High School says, "Where learning is value and excellence is the standard.",

Huntley High School does best in preparing McHenry County College students for college math.

“Only” 46% need remedial assistance.

What is going on when the best a high school district can do is 46%?

How did these incoming MCC students get out of high school?

I am sure there is some explanation. Please share it or them in the comment section.

McHenry County High School Teacher Salary Data from Sun-Times Data Base

June 03, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Crystal Lake High School District 155, District 300, Gene Hoffman, Harvard School District 50, High School, Huntley School District 158, Johnsburg School District, Marengo High School District 156, Marengo School District, McHenry County, McHenry High School District 156, Richmond Burton High School District 157, Teacher, Teacher Pay, Teacher Salaries, Woodstock Unit School District 200

The Chicago Sun-Times released a school teacher and administrator data base this week that some might find interesting.

“Salary data includes base, summer-, after-school pay, benefits, vacation- or sick-day payouts, pre-retirement salary bumps. Average includes only full-time employees,” says the print on top of the search engine page.

Not specifically mention, but included is the pension payments that taxpayers pay for teachers and administrators. Teachers are supposed to pay 9.4%, but many in McHenry County and elsewhere don’t. Those who must pay the employee share of Social Security might be envious of this negotiated deal.

First I looked for average salaries for high school teachers in McHenry County’s districts. You see the results below:

Average compensation for McHenry County's High School District's teachers.

District 300 is classified by state policy-makers as a Kane County school district, so it cannot be combined with the other districts in McHenry County.

You might find it of interest to compare the salaries with the percentage of students who meet or exceed state standards.

Those high schools where students do the best are Crystal Lake and Richmond-Burton.

67.9% for Richmond-Burton High School District and 67.3% for District 155.  Both have a similar percentage of low income kids.  Richmond-Burton’s is a tad higher than Crystal Lake’s.

Compare the average compensation of Crystal Lake and Richmond-Burton and there is no contest.

Crystal Lake High School District 155 ranks 16th highest in the state with average compensation of $91,960.  $62,237 is Richmond-Burton’s average, almost $30,000 less.

District 155 is currently in secret negotiations with its IEA teachers’ union.

Even a cursory review of the salary data will show that teaching in a high school district is the way to make the most money.

As I have explained before, the legislator who wrote the Resource Equalizer State Aid to Education formula in the mid-1970′s was a high school teachers from a high school district.

State Rep. Gene Hoffman figured out how to make sure high school districts benefited most for the formula.  From the figures above, you’d have to agree he achieved his goal.

It doesn’t always work out as well as it does for Crystal Lake’s District 155 teachers. Marengo and Richmond-Burton are also high school districts. The others are unit district, meaning all 13 grades are governing by one school board.

I am sure some commentators will want to share their analyses of these statistics.

Not having figured out how to make charts, but wanting people to be able to search the data, I present below the raw data.  Get the headings from the image above.

16 CHSD 155 McHenry $91,959.72 11.86 7.8 67.4 High School Teacher
74 McHenry CHSD 156 McHenry $68,392.57 9.7 10.5 58.3 High School Teacher
96 Marengo CHSD 154 McHenry $65,754.02 11.78 18.4 60.9 High School Teacher
110 Johnsburg CUSD 12 McHenry $63,468.73 12.55 14.2 61.7 High School Teacher
115 Woodstock CUSD 200 McHenry $62,614.35 11.42 27.8 58.9 High School Teacher
120 Richmond-Burton CHSD 157 McHenry $62,236.80 9.89 9.7 67.9 High School Teacher
239 Cons SD 158 McHenry $53,288.16 7.35 9.9 63.1 High School Teacher
254 Harvard CUSD 50 McHenry $52,338.04 9.62 49.7 41.3 High School Teacher
331 Alden Hebron SD 19 McHenry $48,584.08 11.77 18.3 58.1 High School Teacher

39% of Illinois Teachers Pay Nothing for Pensions

May 16, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Alton, Argo, Arlington Heights, Aurora, Ball Chatham, Belleville, Belvidere School District, Berwyn, Bremen Township, Cahokia, Canton, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School District, Champaign, Chicago Public Schools, Chicago Schools, Cicero, Collinsville, Crete-Monee, Crystal Lake Grade School District 47, Crystal Lake High School District 155, Danville, Decatur, DeKalb, District 155, District 165, District 2, District 200, District 26, District 3, District 300, District 47, Dixon, Dolton, Downers Grove, East Maine, Edwardsville, Effingham, Elgin School District, Elmhurst, Evanston, Freeport, Geneva, Genoa, Grayslake Unit School District 46, Harvard School District 50, Harvey, Highland Park, Homewood, Illinois Education Association, Illinois State Board of Education, Johnsburg School District, Joliet, Kaneland School District 302, Kankakee, Kevin McCarthy, Larry Snow, LaSalle, Lemont, Leyden Township, Lockport Township, Lombard, Lyons Township, Manteno, Marion, Massac, Mattoon, McHenry Grade School District 15, McHenry High School District 156, Moline, Naperville Unit District 203, New Lenox, Niles, Nippersink Elementary School District 2, North Boone, O'Fallon, Oak Lawn, Palatine, Park Ridge, Pension, Peoria, Peru, Plainfield, Proviso Township, Quincy, Reed Custer, Rochester, Rockford School District, Round Lake School District 116, Schaumburg, Schiller Park, School, Springfield, St. Charles School District, Summit Hill, Sycamore School District 427, Taylorville, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union, Thornton Township, Tolono, Union, Urbana, Valley View, Warren Township High School District, Wauconda, Waukegan, West Chicago, Wheeling, Wilmington, Woodstock School District 200, Yorkville, Zion

Larry Snow

While Democrats say Teachers ‘Have Kept Their Part of the Deal?’

is the title of an April 5, 2011, article by former Huntley School District 158 Board member Larry Snow.  (The quote was in the Chicago Tribune Marcy 31, 2011.  It is from Executive Director Dick Ingram of Teachers’ Retirement System.)

The article was published in “The Champion” with this teaser:

“82,981 of 132,502 Illinois Teachers Pay Nothing or Little into Their Pensions

That’s 63% of all teachers in Illinois.

The State Journal-Register is reporting that State Rep. Kevin McCarthy (D-Orland Park) is promoting a bill where state and local governments would all pay six percent of payroll toward employee pensions.

In a revealing sentence in reporter Chris Wetterich’s article, he writes,

What’s unclear is how much more employees themselves would have to pay.

Because no one has done the research except, I believe, the Illinois Education Association and Snow, how much extra teachers would have to pay if their so-called contribution rate was raised from 9.4% to 13.77% is a really good question.

While not covering every school district in Illinois, Snow did research the teachers’ contracts for all of the large school districts (by law all are supposed to be on the internet) in order to find out how much teachers pay in order to get a “full 75 percent pension after working only 27 years.” He points out, “Most adults work for 27 years before they turn age 50.”

As way of background, Snow notes that teachers are not in the Social Security System and, therefore, are not forced to pay Social Security taxes.

“Ordinary workers get hit with a 6.2 percent deduction for Social Security,” Snow writes. “It’s a deduction they have to pay federal and state income taxes on.

“Democrats gave teachers a huge loophole of not paying income taxes on any of their pension deductions” he continues. “This enormous no-tax handout to teachers amounts to billions of dollars each year.”

Snow’s research leads him to this conclusion:

Over 51,000 of the total 132,502 teachers in Illinois contribute nothing from their K-12 paychecks into their pensions. Illinois law says it is to be 9.4 percent.

“About an additional 32,000 teachers pay little into their pensions. It is 1.81 percent to be precise for these 31,956 teachers.

How many teachers pay not a dime toward their retirement?

51,025 teachers in 186 school districts pay nothing for retirement benefits.

They “don’t pay a penny into the 9.4 percent called out by Illinois law.

“There are a total of 868 districts in Illinois.

“The pay-zero teachers listed are 39 percent of all teachers in Illinois,” Snow reveals.

No agency in state government seems to keep track of this information.

Not the Downstate Teachers Retirement Fund, which boldly and incorrectly claims,

“Active TRS members are required to contribute 9.4 percent of their creditable earnings each year…”

The State Board of Education doesn’t keep track either.

My guess is that only the Illinois Education Association has a matrix showing what school districts have given what benefits in contract negotiations.

Snow discovered this about Lockport:

“…on page 14 of the Lockport Township HS 205 teachers contract it reads:

  1. The Board will pay the current level of retirement contribution to the Teachers Retirement System of Illinois.”
  2. It is expressly understood that figures appearing on this salary schedule include a sum equal to the current level of TRS contribution of the base salary of each Teacher which is, in fact, payable to the Teachers’ Retirement System on the Teacher’s behalf.”

“The ISBE report shows this board paying nothing. A Democrat bureaucracy doesn’t check the teachers contracts to see if what is reported, matches what’s in writing.”

And, if legislation is passed requiring 4.37 percentage points more, how long do you think it will take Lockport taxpayers to pick up the difference?

Given that local teachers’ unions pretty much control school boards wherever they are elected (read everywhere but Chicago), my guess is will be on the top of the collective bargaining list.

Do you wonder if Rep. McCarthy knows that?

Is his proposal just a setting up local taxpayers for an even bigger fall?

Five years from now will 39% of teachers still be paying nothing for their pensions?

Even better for teachers is that this pension payment ups their pension payments.

Take a look at the chart below.  Chances are your school district is on it.

Chart of Pension Contributions by 82,981 District Teachers of 132,502 Total Illinois K-12 Teachers

Name of District

 

No. of Teachers Percent of Pension

Contributed by Teachers

Thornton Twp 205 428 Zero
Proviso 209 281 Zero
Waukegan 60 1,098 Zero
Morton 201 455 Zero
Kankakee 111 348 Zero
Joliet 204 340 Zero
Round Lake 116 387 Zero
Rockford 1,843 Zero
Decatur 61 454 Zero
Crete Monee 340 Zero
Danville 118 382 Zero
Valley View 365 1,068 Zero
Aurora West 129 706 Zero
East Peoria 309 69 Zero
Galesburg 281 Zero
Bremen 228 313 Zero
Freeport 317 Zero
Leyden 212 219 Zero
Elgin U-46 2,332 Zero
Rock Island 388 Zero
Mattoon 225 Zero
Collinsville 394 Zero
Massac 1 143 Zero
Sterling 219 Zero
Belvidere 531 Zero
Quincy 436 Zero
Dixon 179 Zero
West Chicago 248 Zero
Cook County 130 289 Zero
Cicero 99 738 Zero
Joliet 86 617 Zero
Harvey 152 163 Zero
Crystal Lake 155 412 Zero
Crystal Lake 47 564 Zero
Wheeling 21 489 Zero
Champaign 4 717 Zero
United CUSD 304 68 Zero
Riverdale 100 76 Zero
Reed Custer 255 114 Zero
Wilmington 209U 84 Zero
United Township 30 90 Zero
Summit Hill 161 213 Zero
Plainfield 1,695 Zero
Schiller Park 81 98 Zero
Dolton 149 176 Zero
Township 211 Palatine 799 Zero
Ball Chatham 5 248 Zero
Taylorville 3 152 Zero
Williamsville 15 81 Zero
Harrisburg 3 130 Zero
Belleville 201 281 Zero
Dupo 196 76 Zero
O’Fallon 203 145 Zero
O’Fallon 90 207 Zero
Rochester 3A 142 Zero
Pekin 108 248 Zero
Morton 709 175 Zero
New Lenox 122 287 Zero
Frankfort 157 158 Zero
Marion 2 219 Zero
Carterville 5 110 Zero
Kinnikinnick 131 122 Zero
Tolono 7 116 Zero
Mahomet-Seymour 3 161 Zero
Champaign 4 717 Zero
Urbana 346 Zero
Charleston 1 180 Zero
Park Ridge 64 319 Zero
Evanston 202 222 Zero
Maine HSD 207 508 Zero
Arlington Heights 214 753 Zero
Niles 219 350 Zero
Berkeley 87 165 Zero
Berwyn South 263 Zero
Lyons 204 239 Zero
Lemont 113 144 Zero
Palatine 15 713 Zero
Schaumburg 54 1,003 Zero
Oak Lawn 123 203 Zero
Oak Lawn 229 114 Zero
CHSD 230 Orland Park 519 Zero
Argo 217 111 Zero
Homewood 233 174 Zero
Genoa 424 137 Zero
Sycamore 427 231 Zero
Dekalb 428 362 Zero
Lombard 44 216 Zero
Downers Grove 58 277 Zero
Hinsdale 86 296 Zero
Elmhurst 205 538 Zero
Naperville 203 1,063 Zero
Effingham 40 176 Zero
Canton Union 66 175 Zero
Morris 54 61 Zero
Morris 101 50 Zero
Coal City 1 138 Zero
Jersey 100 164 Zero
Central CUSD 301 224 Zero
Kaneland 302 275 Zero
St. Charles 303 880 Zero
Cahokia 298 0.4
Chicago Public Schools 23,219 2
Peoria 150 988 0.4
Springfield 1,105 0.4
Moline 40 461 0.4
Harvard 149 0.87
Dolton 148 236 1.4
Belleville 118 228 0.4
Pekin 303 125 0.4
Hononegah 207 118 0.4
Arlington Heights 59 444 3
Leyden 212 219 0.4
Summit 104 103 0.4
Palos 118 130 0.4
CHSD 219 Orland Park 519 0.4
Bensenville 2 145 1.4
DuPage 88 266 0.4
CHSD 94 122 0.9
CUSD 300 1,189 4.4
Hawthorn 73 253 1.4
Lake Forest 115 132 0.4
Wauconda 118 273 0.4
Johnsburg 12 158 0.4
Cary 26 192 4.9
Woodstock 200 385 1.4
Keeneyville 20 107 0.4
Winnebago 323 117 0.4
LaSalle-Peru Twp. 120 88 0.7
Prairie-Hills 144 187 0.4
Geneva 304 367 Zero
Herscher 2 126 Zero
Manteno 5 160 Zero
Bourbonnais 53 160 Zero
Bradley 61 103 Zero
Bradley Bourbonnais 307 114 Zero
Momence 1 88 Zero
Yorkville 115 329 Zero
Plano 88 154 Zero
Oswego 308 827 Zero
Streator 44 132 Zero
Ottawa 141 140 Zero
Ottawa 140 102 Zero
Glenview 34 343 Zero
Zion 6 177 Zero
Grayslake 46 266 Zero
Elmwood Park 401 181 Zero
Libertyville 70 159 Zero
North Shore 112 374 Zero
HSD 113 Highland Park 249 Zero
Grant 124 91 Zero
Zion-Benton 126 156 Zero
Evanston 65 547 Zero
Grayslake 127 187 Zero
Meridian 15 64 Zero
Mt. Zion 3 133 Zero
Edwardsville 7 480 Zero
Alton 11 467 Zero
Macomb 185 130 Zero
McHenry 15 282 Zero
McHenry 156 158 Zero
Nippersink 2 92 Zero
Columbia 4 111 Zero
Waterloo 5 166 Zero
Hillsboro 3 114 Zero
Meridian 223 113 Zero
Illinois Valley Central 321 139 Zero
Carbondale 165 76 Zero
Carbondale 95 105 Zero
Riverton 14 85 Zero
Auburn 10 90 Zero
Pawnee 11 47 Zero
Panhandle 2 35 Zero
Sullivan 300 75 Zero
Centralia 135 93 Zero
Litchfield 12 83 Zero
Harlem 122 505 Zero
Granite City 9 617 Zero
Princeton 115 86 Zero
Princeton 500 43 Zero
Bond County 2 120 Zero
Duquoin CUSD 300 101 Zero
Rocton 140 102 Zero
Rochelle Twp. HSD 212 71 Zero
Rochelle CCSD 231 131 Zero
Byron 226 127 Zero
Oregon 220 104 Zero
Farmington Central 265 85 Zero
Porta 202 75 Zero
River Bend 2 71 Zero
Red Bud 132 73 Zero
Sparta 140 105 Zero
Southwestern 9 107 Zero
Staunton 6 87 Zero
Gillespie 7 81 Zero
Hamilton County 10 83 Zero
Midwest Central 191 85 Zero
Tuscola 301 86 Zero
West Carroll 314 99 Zero
Oakwood 76 64 Zero
Hoopeston 11 94 Zero
Westville 2 80 Zero
Beardstown 15 98 Zero
El Paso-Gridley 11 99 Zero
Murphysboro 186 137 Zero
Monticello 25 111 Zero
Paris-Union 95 74 Zero
Mt. Vernon Twp. 210 80 Zero
Mt. Vernon 80 109 Zero
Jasper County 1 101 Zero
Steger 194 128 Zero
Calumet City 155 77 Zero
North Boone 200 116 Zero
CCSD 93 Carol Stream 294 Zero
East Maine SD 63 254 Zero
Lockport Township HS 205 205 Zero
     
Above Teachers Total 82,981  

 

“Three in a Row” Romping in McHenry High School board Race

April 05, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: McHenry High School District 156

One doe not have to be an election expert to know that the "Three in a Row" candidates are going to win this one.

Beth Taylor, Steve Bellmore and Timothy Byers have won the McHenry High School Board race.

And, in the “What part of ‘NO!’ don’t you understand?” department, the tax hike referendum is getting an 84.3% “No” vote.

The McHenry High School Tax Hikers are losing the bond referendum vote. over 5-1.

 

McHenry’s “Tyvek Tower”

April 05, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Condo, McHenry, McHenry High School Board, McHenry High School District 156, Ned Neumann, RiverWalk

A comment showed up from long-time public official (McHenry High School Board) Ned Neumann that covers a topic I’ve been interested in but haven’t gotten around to writing about.

Municipalities along the Fox River have gotten in big financial trouble subsidizing housing overlooking the river. The first I noticed was Elgin. Then came McHenry with its RiverWalk, built where the old McHenry Hospital was located.

McHenry RiverWalk from Curtis Commercial web site.

Neumann says the building is up, but the planning was so poor that there isn’t a parking place for each condo.

Here’s Neumann’s commentary:

Cal-

You’ll remember me from forty years ago when I was on the McHenry High School Board, eventually for eighteen years.

You’ve given a lot of coverage lately to the “three in a row” candidates and their opposition to the eight million dollar tax increase being voted on Tuesday, April 5.

You’re right and they are right.

As much of the current Board as possible should be replaced and the tax increase should not be approved, the problem is; there’s a much bigger story in McHenry right now.

McHenry’s equivalent of Algonquin’s Tyvek Tower continues to be a joke. It’s primarily a residential condominium complex that has grossly inadequate parking.

The failed Algonquin condo project overlooking the Fox River and Downtown

Not even one spot for each condo, no spots for the twelve stores or restaurant, no spots for a store owner or their employees, none for a guest or customer.

Problem is: the building is mostly done and some occupancy in place.

It, the building, will survive.

The question is: survive as what?

People with a hundred, or several hundred thousand dollars to spend aren’t going to buy in a building without adequate parking.

Nobody has bought in four and a half years of effort.

The few who had contracts walked away when the parking got diminished by the City Council to help the developer survive.

Since then the bank took it back, entered into a contract for its sale to a group that is requesting the City to change the developer agreement to allow them to convert it into a rental complex.

The City gave two million dollars of incentive for the developer to build a ten million dollar owner occupied residential complex and some commercial space.

Seventy five percent of it residential units.

A four story low income or Section 8 rental complex will have nowhere near the value to justify two million dollars of incentives.

We have many low income rental properties, one or more in each of our other downtowns.

We may need more.

Certainly not as the crown jewel of our RiverWalk in the absolute center of our town.

Algonquin is lucky.

Their Tyvek Tower will either be finished according to its original plan or torn down.

McHenry’s will either be finished according to its original plan or diminished into a low income rental complex, the tenants of which somehow function without cars.

There’s talk of a special City Council meeting on April 11 with the only topic on the agenda being RiverWalk Center.

The contract purchaser group speaks freely of their request for conversion to a rental complex.

The City Council has previously caved in and gave in to whatever absurd request the out-of-towner high rollers requested.

I wonder what they’ll do this time.

I hope you pay attention. Keep up the good work. Regards!!

Ned Neumann

McHenry High School – Grade School Consolidation Costs

March 19, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Harrison Grade School District 36, McHenry, McHenry Elementary School District 15, McHenry Grade School, McHenry Grade School District 15, McHenry High School District 156, School, School Report Card, Wonder Lake

I’ve run the increased cost side of the numbers for merging McHenry Grade School District 15 and Wonder Lake’s Harrison School District 36 with McHenry High School District 156 and the numbers verify the judgment of the seven school board candidates Wednesday night.

When asked if they favored consolidation, as proposed Democratic Party Governor Pat Quinn, the answers were

“No,” “No,” “No,” “No,” “No,” “No,” “No.”

Seeking election to the District 156 High School Board for the first time are Timothy Byers, Darnell Qualls and Tracy Simon. All turned thumbs down on consolidation of school districts, as did the other four candidates for the board who took part in the League of Women Voters candidates' night.

When I calculated the addition cost that bringing grade school teacher salaries up to those enjoyed by Crystal Lake’s High School District 155 teachers, the number was an extra $27 million.

I didn’t know how to calculate the savings from fewer administrators, but Quinn estimated the total to be $100 million statewide.  Would it be even a million dollars savings in District 155?

 

This part of the school report card shows average salaries in District 15 and compares them to the statewide average.

Elementary school teachers in McHenry District 15 earn an average of $53,496   a year, according to its 2010 School Report Card. (The link can actually be found on the front page of the district’s web site.)

Harrison School District's salaries are shown on the Report Card along with a lot of other data.

In Harrison, the figure is $46,653.  You can see the whole report card here.

The weighted average of the two is $52,853.

If you are into source data, it’s below:

Average salaries and number of teachers

  • McHenry High School District 156 – $68,228 – 158 teachers
  • McHenry Grade School District 15 – $53,496 – 282 teachers
  • Harrison Grade School District 36 – $46,653 – 29 teachers

The average McHenry High School teacher salary is $68,228. That is $14,732 more than the average elementary school teacher's salary in its feeder districts.

So, if we subtract the average grade school salary ($53,496) from the average high school salary ($68,228) the difference is $14,732.  (The link to the high school 2010 School Report Card can be found here.)

With a total of 311 elementary school teachers, the total salary differential is $4,581,652.

Not as much as for District 155 to the south, but still a hefty number.

No McHenry High School Candidate Favors Consolidation Grade Schools with High School District

March 18, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Consolidation, Harrison Grade School District 36, Illinois League of Women Voters, McHenry, McHenry Elementary School District 15, McHenry Grade School, McHenry Grade School District 15, McHenry High School Board, McHenry High School District 156, Pat Quinn, School, Wonder Lake

First to answer the consolidation question, Beth Taylor nailed the reason for opposition.

There were two questions about consolidation of high school and grade school districts at the McHenry High School Board candidates night sponsored by the McHenry County League of Women Voters Wednesday night.

Beth Taylor’s reply to the first question, which focused on possible administrative savings:

“The wage adjustments outweigh administrative savings by 8-10 times.”

Steven White pointed out there are “significant differences in average salary between elementary and high school salaries that would eliminate (any administrative savings).”

The League of Women Votrers moderator at the candidates' night.

Incumbent Board member Mellody Ahrens agreed. “We would have a big salary increase…”

“Consolidation doesn’t seem to be a good idea,” agreed Timothy Byers. “It would cost the district a great deal of money.”

The other candidates made similar remarks.

All had compared the costs of raising elementary school teachers to the higher level of high school teachers and decided it wasn’t a good idea.

Then, the moderator asked for a “Yes,” “No” answer on the topic of consolidation, evoking Governor Pat Quinn’s name.

Both candidates supported by the teachers union and those supported by the taxpaying public opposed consolitation of local grade schools with the high school district.

“No,” “No,” “No,” “No,” “No,” “No,” “No,”

said the seven candidates present.

Besides the ones mentioned above, the others in attendance were Steve Bellmore, Tracy Simon and Darnell Qualls.

Missing the meeting were Alexandra Coy and Daniel Koruna.

Why two questions when the answers to the first question were all negative?

I can only image that the Illinois League of Women Voters favors the bill that would bust the budgets of taxpayers on the eastern side of McHenry County where there are not unit districts. (I emailed the state League early Thursday morning asking whether it had taken a position on the legislation, but my email went unanswered.)

Tomorrow, the math.

How McHenry High School Board Candidates Line Up on the Referendum

March 16, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Beth Taylor, Darnell Qualls, McHenry, McHenry High School Board, McHenry High School District 156, Mellody Ahrens, Referendum, Steve Bellmore, Steven White, Timothy Byers, Tracy Simon

Seven of nine candidates on the ballot for the McHenry High School Board showed up the League of Women Voters candidates night.

Incumbent Mellody Ahrens

Tracy Simon

The McHenry County League of Women Voters held a candidates’ night for the McHenry High School Board Wednesday night at McHenry East High School.

Steven White

There was too much covered to spell it all out, but the most important question was how candidates planned to vote on the tax hiking referendum.

Three candidates favored the measure.

The first is the incumbent up for re-election, Mellody Ahrens.

The members of the blue and white yard sign slate do, too.

They are Tracy Simon and Stephen White.

All the rest who participated said they plan to vote “No”.

Steve Bellmore

 

  • Steve Bellmore
  • Timothy Byers
  • Beth Taylor

Timothy Byers

In addition, Darnell Qualls said he was an opponent to the referendum.

Two people listed on the ballot didn’t show up.

Beth Taylor

They are Alexandra Coy and Daniel Koruna.

Darnell Qualls

The missing two are, respectively, the second and last on the ballot.

Being first on a long ballot like this provides about a ten percent advantage. Being last or second has been show to add about five percent to one’s vote totals.