McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Natural Gas’

Natural Gas Odor Comes from Routine NICOR Maintenance in Burton’s Bridge and Bad Atmosphic Conditions

June 05, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Burton's Bridge, Crystal Lake, Crystal Lake Fire Department, Gas, Natural Gas, NICOR, Prairie Grove Police

NICOR Smell Gas symbolI first learned of the gas smell when my wife called from her office in the Advocate Good Shepherd Building across from the Pingree Road Metra Train Station in Crystal Lake.

She told me the building had been evacuated because of the odor.

First out of the box with a press release was the Prairie Grove Police Department.  They wrote:

“Reports of Natural GAS Smells: Please be advised NICOR GAS is currently working on a GAS LINE within the proximity of Route 176 and Bay View Beach Road.”

Next was the Crystal Lake Fire Department, which sent the following:

Natural Gas Odor throughout Crystal Lake

The Crystal Lake Fire Rescue Department has been receiving numerous calls of a natural gas odor throughout the City. These calls have been widespread to all areas of the City.

Fire staff has been in contact with representatives from NiCor and have identified the cause of the odor as maintenance work being performed at their facility on Route 176 near Burton’s Bridge.

NiCor staff advised that the maintenance work being performed is routine and should pose no hazard.

Atmospheric conditions today have kept the odor closer to the ground which is contrary to the dissipation that normally occurs with this work.

As of 12:45, NiCor staff advised that the maintenance work is complete and we anticipate the odor to dissipate shortly.

Sierra Club Flip-Flop on Desirability of Using Natural Gas Criticized

March 11, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Fracking, Natural Gas, Sierra Club

Crystal Lake’s Loren Burkett offers the following commentary:

“McHenry County College recently hosted an informational meeting on natural gas production and hydraulic fracturing.

“This was presented by the Sierra Club which has a strong history of supporting natural gas for the generation of electricity because of it’s clean burning and lower carbon output.

“It soon became apparent that this informational meeting was actually a propaganda presentation aimed at killing natural gas!

“What happened?

“When did the Sierra Club flip flop and why?

“A little internet research (you can always believe what’s on the internet) and a May 31st, 2012 Wall Street Journal editorial gave some clues.

“Basically the gas industry has been so successful in lowering costs that the “bridge fuel to the 21st century” has become the future.

  • Manufacturing
  • electric power plants
  • long haul truck
  • delivery trucks
  • railroad locomotives and
  • more

are considering converting to natural gas.

Will windmills  be profitable without Federal subsidies?

Will windmills be profitable without Federal subsidies?

“Natural gas may soon render most renewable energy technologies non-competitive.

  • Wind power
  • solar
  • ethanol (a disaster on its own) and
  • others

may be unable to compete even with heavy federal subsidies.

“The free market is making a decision and the Sierra Club does not like it.

“Much of the world is also concerned by our potential energy independence.

“If Congress allows it, we may soon ship liquefied natural gas to Europe.

“Vladimir Putin is afraid that we will break his monopoly grip as a gas supplier to parts of Europe.

“The Middle East nations and all nations dependent on oil exports to the United States are concerned.

“US energy independence would have economic and world political implications we can only dream about.

“It sure would be great in our polarized world if we could go to a credible, accurate and neutral source for information.

“Instead we must always be on guard and look for hidden agendas, selective facts and even manufactured facts.

“Illinois is close to passing laws regulating fracking that will hopefully allow our state to participate in the economic and employment benefits of gas production and do it safely.

“Suddenly the United States of America is holding a winning hand that has tremendous economic advantages and could change the world political landscape.

“Let us do this wisely.”

= = = = =
See Green Party position here.

Illinois Green Party View on Fracking

March 07, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Fracking, Green Party, Natural Gas, Pat Quinn, Rich Whitney

While the price of natural gas has decreased enough as a result of fracking, the Illinois Green Party is opposing expansion in Illinois. While this is a Southern Illinois issue, I thought those of us in Northern Illinois who have benefited economically from the process might be interested in this viewpoint of the fight.

ILGP TO QUINN: YOU CAN’T FRACK YOUR WAY OUT OF A BUDGET CRISIS

Greens to participate in March 12 lobby day to support fracking moratorium bill (SB1418)

Green Party leaders blasted Gov. Quinn’s claim, in his annual budget address, that hydraulic fracturing — or fracking — “is coming to Illinois,” as if it were inevitable, disrespecting the efforts of thousands of activists and concerned citizens struggling to prevent fracking operations here.

Quinn repeated the falsehood that a fracking bill now before the General Assembly (HB 2615) would create “the strongest environmental regulations in the nation,” and touted it as a jobs bill and source of revenue, with “the potential to create thousands of jobs in Downstate Illinois.”

“Illinois officials are promoting fracking as a solution to the state’s financial crisis, but this type of short-term thinking is what got us into the mess to start with,” said Illinois Green Party Secretary Vito Mastrangelo, one of a number of Green Party members in SAFE (Southern Illinoisans Against Fracturing Our Environment).

“The government is desperate for the fracking revenue but does not account for all the costs:

  • the increased medical costs from the adverse health effects – both short-term and long-term – that will result from the pollution of our air, water, and soil
  • the extraordinary wear and tear on infrastructure
  • the increased cost for scarce water in periods of drought
  • the costs to clean up the soil and water contamination when (not if) it happens.

And to frack in disregard of geologists’ warning of an overdue major earthquake in Southern Illinois is downright reckless.”

“Quinn sometimes likes to posture as being a ‘green’ governor, claiming to be supportive of environmental measures and clean energy,” added Illinois Green Party Vice Chair Gini Lester.

“But in coming out in favor of fracking, and supposing that regulations can adequately protect our air, water and land, Quinn is ‘green’ only in the sense of ‘naive.’

‘With current technology, fracking is inherently unpredictable and unsafe.

“The only responsible course is to ban the practice, or at least enact a moratorium unless and until the energy corporations can demonstrate that all serious risks have been eliminated.”

While Quinn touts the proposed regulations as adequate to protect public and environmental health, his new budget cuts appropriations for the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Along with SAFE, Illinois Greens support a moratorium in Illinois rather than the seriously flawed regulatory bill, and will be participating in a lobby day at the State Capitol on March 12th in support of a moratorium bill (SB 1418).

Illinois Greens also blasted Quinn’s budget proposal as a whole.

Despite prior claims to be “the education governor,” his proposal imposes huge cuts in appropriations to public education, including every public university in the state.

The basic theme of Quinn’s address was that the State’s ongoing pension crisis makes regrettable sacrifices necessary, and that, until pension reform is enacted, the best that can be done is to save some programs and accept painful cuts in others.

Illinois Greens challenge this premise.

Rich Whitney

Rich Whitney

“Governor Quinn is correct in recognizing that the unfunded pension crisis is a millstone around the neck of our State government,” stated Illinois Green Party Chairperson Rich Whitney.

“He even correctly acknowledged that one cause of the problem was the bi-partisan failure of past governors and General Assemblies to adequately fund the system.

“But now his only ‘solution’ – other than illusory gimmicks like more gambling – is to make educators, other public sector workers, retirees, students and all of us who depend on public services bear all the painful consequences.

“Short of outright union-busting, Quinn is the Democratic version of Scott Walker.”

“Quinn’s proposals are utterly reprehensible when you consider that there are common-sense public policy solutions to both the budget crisis and the pension crisis that neither the Democratic nor the Republican leadership see fit to mention.

“For example, another major cause of the pension crisis is Wall Street speculation, which led to a collapse in the trust funds in 2008. Yet we don’t make the big financial speculators pay their fair share of tax revenues. Working people pay sales taxes of 6 percent or more on necessary consumer goods. A much smaller tax on speculative trading could play a major role in restoring fiscal health to our state government.”

Whitney pointed out that a Speculation Sales Tax on trades at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Chicago Board Options Exchange, of just $1 on every contract traded, would generate over $6 billion for the Illinois budget, based on trading volume in 2010 and 2011.

The Illinois Green Party advocates other policies that could help balance the State’s budget and adequately fund its pension system, education and social services without imposing austerity on the people.

These include instituting a fee-and-dividend system on greenhouse gas emissions, the creation of a state-administered public bank, and measures to make the Illinois tax system more progressive.

At Lake in the Hills Airport Newt Gingrich Says County Needs Visionary for President

March 15, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Barack Obama, Debt, Gas, Gas Prices, Gasoline Price, Lake In the Hills, Lake in the Hills Airport, McHenry County, Natural Gas, Newt Gingrich, Oil Drilling, Oil Price

Newt Gringrich

I’ve been listening to Newt Gingrich since former State Rep. Bernie Pedersen starting sending me GOPAC tapes every month during the late 1980′s.

What impressed me was that his visions embraced the entire country–from suburbs to inner city.

I was particularly impressed with the privately-funded program to pay public housing kids to read books. The best line was when an older sister who had pooh-poohed the concept saw the money that her little sister brought home after a week.

“Where’d you get that money?”

“Readin’,” the little sis answered. (There was a verification process, sort of a verbal book report.)

The next week the older sister got with the program and read enough to buy a pair of Nike’s with what she earned by reading.

Of the Republican Presidential candidates, Gingrich clearly gives the best speech.

Today he performed at Ray Polte’s airplane hanger at the Lake in the Hills (used to be and could still have been Crystal Lake) Airport.

Inspired by the aircraft in the hanger, Gingrich talked about the efforts of the Wright Brothers to learn how to fly.

Newt Gingrich

He said what Orville and Wilbur had in their favor was that they knew they didn’t know how to fly.

After being told by the U.S. Weather Bureau where the winds were most reliable, they headed to Kitty Hawk on the train.

They took extra wood, Gingrich explained, because they knew they were going to fail.

And they failed 499 times.

But on the 500th attempt they succeeded.

Orville ran next to the plane on its first flight so he could balance the plane manually if he needed to to save his brother’s life, Gingrich said.

Within three years they flew a plane around Manhattan.

Gingrich attributed this to the technological advances American inventors and engineers are capable of, if the government doesn’t get in the way.

Gingrich brought laughter to the crowd of a couple of hundred by asking what the Congressional hearing would have been like, after hundreds of crashes, if there had been a government subsidy involved.

Then, he pointed out that the Smithsonian Institution had been given a $50,000 grant to build an airplane.

A premier scientific institution, those working on the project knew they knew how to fly.

They built a catapult, a concept still used on aircraft carriers.

They aimed the catapult out over the Potomac River.

The basic problem was that they didn’t plan for failure, Gingrich said.

While the Wright Brothers had soft sand upon which to land, if the Smithsonian’s plane crashed, there was no chance for a second try.

If the plane didn’t break up on impact and sank, lifting it from the bottom would have demolished it.

There was an Associated Press reporter for the first Kitty Hawk flight.

The Smithsonian invited the press, who, after the crash, wrote of the spectacular failure.

Gingrich told this story to let people know he was enthusiastic about science even though he had denigrated President Obama’s pitch to use algae to fuel cars.

He presented himself as the candidate of Wright, Edison and Henry Ford, “people who invented the modern world without government subsidies.”

He then moved on to the theme of the campaign, $2.50 a gallon gasoline.

That’s what the sign on the podium said.

Gingrich criticized Obama for praising Brazil for doing offshore drilling, while preventing it in United States waters.

He criticized Obama for his elation at convincing the Saudis to increase oil production, which Obama said would lower prices.

Then, Gingrich pounced.

If increased oil production in the Mideast would lower gasoline prices, why wouldn’t increased oil production here have the same effect.

And, of course, anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of the laws of supply and demand would know that.

So, the real question is whether the President should be “a purchasing agent” of oil abroad or someone trying to create jobs in the United States.

Gingrich pointed to North Dakota with its oil boom and 3.5% unemployment rate.

And he pointed to the drop in natural gas prices because of the huge new supply resulting from using the new technology of fracking.

A shot from the back of the Ray Plote airplane hanger.

Gingrich drew an analogy with oil prices, which may or may not be valid, because natural gas has a domestic use and distribution system, while oil prices are set on the world market.

He pointed out that in North Dakota alone, the recoverable oil was estimated to be 150 million barrels fifteen years ago.

Until last week, the new estimate was 4 billion barrels.

And within the last seven days the number has been increased to 24 billion barrels.

He predicted that within two years, when technology is developed to get oil from 800 feet down, the reserves would be estimated at 500 billion barrels.

Using his natural gas price drop analogy argument, he thinks that the price could go lower than the $2.50 a gallon pump price he is merchandising.

Besides North Dakota, he points to tremendouse acreage in Alaska and offshore drilling to provide additional supply.

The Presidential candidate argued that the Strategic Oil Reserve could do little to lower the price of gas.

Gingrich said his goal as President would be to make us energy self-sufficient.

He drew applause when he said, “I do not ever again want to see an American President bow down to a Saudi King. The Saudis are not our allies.”

At one point Gingrich read an attack on him by President Obama after Gingrich made fun of Obama’s having said that algae would help solve the energy problem.

“They make jokes about biofuels. They must have been founding members of the flat earth society.”

Gingrich’s reply was the Obama must belong “to the flat earth Sierra Club society.”

That brought a laugh from the audience.

= = = = =
A commenter adds something I didn’t put above:

After the speech Newt Gingrich and his wife Callista worked the front of the crowd.

I was at the airport and saw Newt and His lovely wife.Newt spoke on a lot of topics without a teleprompter and did not stumble over his words or use lots of Umms in between his thoughts.

Great Speaker!

Then his solution to eliminate the Federal Deficit is outstanding and the 300 or so people loved it too.

His solution is open federal lands for oil and take the oil royalties paid to Government and put them in a special account to pay off the deficit and not be used for other purposes.

There is a certain magnetism to a Presidential candidate.

The royalties are said to be worth 18 TRILLION dollars!

This program will make USA and energy supplier to the world and let us be energy independent! He got big applause for this.

I am very glad that my wife and I were able to see him live.

Very Impressive man!

I took lots of photos and got some very good ones.

Natural Gas Tax Elimination Won’t Draw Business

February 03, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Business, Business Development, Natural Gas, Pat Quinn, Tax

That's not Governor Pat Quinn blowing smoke out of this car. He rides in a limo now.

Either Governor Pat Quinn

  • doesn’t know what he is talking about with regard to the appeal to business that ending the state tax on natural gas or
  • he’s just blowing smoke.

In 1986, in my last bureaucratic job with state government, I put together the program to buy natural gas directly.

Manufacturers, big institutions, school districts, churches, retail chains and about anybody with a brain was already doing so.

By the way, I earned by $40,000-something salary that year. The program save over $1 million.