McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Petition’

Number and Staple Petition Sheets and Receipt from Statement of Economic Interest When Filing for Office

February 24, 2013 By: Cal Skinner Category: Election, Election Challenge, Marc Munaretto, Nancy Scalero, Petition, Petition Challenge

There are two mistakes that newcomers to seeking office make that opponents use to eliminate them from the ballot.

“Easier to beat no one than someone,” goes the logic.

The first is to fail to number the pages of one’s petition.

Now-Algonquin Township Supervisor candidate Marc Munaretto challenge Nancy Scalero’s failure to number her pages together when they both were running for Algonquin Township Clerk.

Munaretto won by default.

Today, however, let’s look at how a veteran office holder got tossed off the ballot in southern Cook County.

Because Thornton Township High School Board President Kevin Williams didn't staple his election petitions together, he got kicked off the April ballot.

Because Thornton Township High School Board President Kevin Williams didn’t staple his election petitions together, he got kicked off the April ballot.

He didn’t staple his pages together and that, rather than his being a ex-felon, got him kicked off the Thornton Township High School District 205 ballot.

So, beginning candidates,

  1. number your petition pages
  2. staple all of your pages together and
  3. be sure you staple your receipt for filing you Statement of Economic Interest in the packet (not doing to got Nunda Township Supervisor John Heisler kicked off the ballot)

Heisler Petition Challenge Hearing Postponed

December 14, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Challenge, John Hiesler, Nunda, Nunda Township, Petition, Petition Challenge, Tom Palmer

Palmer, Tom looking left

Tom Palmer

John Heisler

John Heisler

Chairman of the Nunda Township Electoral Board Tom Palmer advises me that the challenge to Supervisor John Heisler’s petition for re-election has been postponed until 1 PM, Wednesday, December 19th, at the Nunda Township Hall.

“At the electoral board hearing, we approved a standard set of rules, entered documents as official exhibits, and continued the hearing…,” Palmer emailed me.

If Heisler is removed from the Republican primary ballot, three candidates will remain:

  • Bridgett Provenzano (current Township Clerk and wife of County Board member Nick Provenzano)
  • Kelvin Lee Jennings (current Trustee)
  • Kerry Leigh (Oakwood Hills Trustee)

It is unknown whether Heisler would run as a Independent if he were denied the opportunity to run as a Republican. He won his first race in a write-in campaign.

Pamela J. “Pam” Fender Stays on the GOP Ballot

December 11, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Adam Lasker, Barbara Murphy, Betty Zirk, Grafton Township, Harriet Ford, Jim Kelly, Linda Moore, Martin Waitzman, Pam Fender, Petition, Petition Challenge

The Grafton Township Electoral Board consisted of Clerk Harriet Ford and Trustees Barbara Murphy and Betty Zirk. To the right is Ancel Glink attorney Adam Lasker.

In a completely scripted performance lasting just ten minutes,

  •  petition challenger Wrayburn Krohn’s attorney, Judith Svensen, withdrew her client’s objection,
  • the Grafton Township Electoral Board accepted the withdrawal and
  • ruled unanimously that Pam J. “Pam” Fender would appear on the Republican primary ballot on February 26, 2013

The objection had been based primarily on Fender’s have put two names in the box where the candidate’s name appeared, plus having noted the election was on Feb. 26, 2012, rather than 2013.

Electoral Board Chairwoman Barbara Murphy got over the first problem by announcing Fender’s name would read, Pamela J ‘Pam’ Fender.”

Objector’s attorney Judith Svensen was up and down so fast that by the time I took this photo, the action had moved to Pam Fender, seen holding up her hand.

The incorrect date was ignored since the objection was withdrawn.

Fender sat next to her attorney Jim Kelly, whom she announced soon after declaring her candidacy would be running on her “peace” slate for township trustee.  Kelly did not file for that office.

Besides Murphy, the other members of the Electoral Board were Clerk Harriet Ford and Trustee Betty Zirk.  Both Murphy and Zirk voted to install Fender as Township Administrator without advertising the opening.

Watching the proceedings were primary opponents Martin Waitzman and Linda Moore.

Attorney for the Electoral Board was Adam Lasker of Ancel Glink.

Objection Filed Against Nunda Township Supervisor John Heisler’s Petitions

December 10, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bridgett Provenzano, John Fogarty, John Heisler, Nunda Township, Objection, Petition, Petition Challenge, Russell Scott, Statement of Economic Interest

John Heisler

Not only has Grafton Township Supervisor candidate Pam Fender had an objection filed against her petitions, but so has one been filed against Nunda Township Supervisor John Heisler’s.

The objection is that Heisler’s filing is incomplete because he did not attach a receipt from his filing of his Statement of Economic Interest.  This form must be filed by all elected officials or they get removed from office, so Heisler has obviously filed one.  What he apparently did not do is attach a receipt showing that he had filed it.

You can read the objection below. Click to enlarge any image.

If Heisler is kicked off the ballot, that would leave a three-way Republican Primary Election with the following facing off against each other:

  • Bridgett Provenzano (current Township Clerk and wife of County Board member Nick Provenzano)
  • Kelvin Lee Jennings (current Trustee)
  • Kerry Leigh (Oakwood Hills Trustee)

If kicked off the ballot before December 26th, Heisler, like Fender, could run as an Independent.

Linda Moore Goes to Pam Fender’s Defense

December 08, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Grafton Township, Linda Moore, Martin Waitzman, Pam Fender, Petition, Petition Challenge

Marty Waitzman

Linda Moore

A press release from Grafton Township Supervisor Linda Moore:

WITHDRAW THE PAM FENDER CHALLENGE

Grafton Township Supervisor, Linda Moore called on one of her primary opponents to end his challenge to another opponent, Pam Fender. “Mr. Waitzman, I am asking you to have your supporters withdraw their objections to Ms. Fender’s rightful place on the ballot.”

Pam Fender

Brushing aside any doubt as to which candidate is behind the challenge, Supervisor Moore said, “I support Pam’s right to ballot access. It should be the voters, not attorneys that decide who should be the next supervisor.”

“Attorney Waitzman has said repeatedly he will not involve Grafton Township in endless litigation. Then before the race even starts, right before Christmas, he shows his real colors,” said Moore.

“I have looked at the nomination papers. While there are minor mistakes, I believe they are in substantial compliance with the Illinois Election Code.” “Let the people have their say.”

Ms. Moore plans to proceed full speed ahead with her re-election plans.

Easy Ballot Access for Marengo Aldermanic Candidates

December 06, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Don Lockhart, Election, Marengo, Petition

Mayor Don Lockhart is up for re-election.

With some contests showing up in Crystal Lake for City Council, I called Marengo to find out about the requirements for getting on the ballot.

For Mayor and Clerk its a minimum of 57 signatures and a maximum of 107, although I was advised that if one were running for Clerk a bit fewer than the 107 might be advisable because fewer people voted for Clerk last time around than for Mayor.

For the Alderman slots, however, you would not believe how few signatures are needed to get on the ballot.

Less than the ten for Precinct Committeeman.

There are four wards and the largest number of signatures required is 6. The ranges can be seen below:

  • Ward 1: 5-55
  • Ward 2: 6-56
  • Ward 3 (on two-year and one four-year term): 4-54
  • Ward 5: 5-55

So, if you hankering to get on the ballot in Marengo, no problem.

You can see the ward map here or below:

Marengo 2013 Ward Map.  C lick to enlarge.

Filing for municipal, park board, rescue squad, fire protection and other local tax districts is from December 17th-26th.

Grafton Township Assessor Bill Ottley Running for Re-Election, Time for Other Potential Township Candidates to Start Planning

July 13, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Bill Ottley, Filing, Grafton Township, Grafton Township Assessor, Petition, Petition Passing, Primary Election, Township

It’s that time of year when township officials have to make up their minds whether they are running for re-election.

It’s also time for those thinking about challenging township officials to be making similar calculations.

When I last saw Grafton Township Assessor Bill Ottley if he were running for re-election, I got an affirmative reply.

Assuming Ottley decides to run in the Republican primary election, he (and others) can begin circulating petitions for the February 26th election on August 28th.

Partisan primary election petitions for township office must be filed between November 19th and 26th.

Thanksgiving is November 22nd.

Last time around Algonquin, Dorr, Grafton, McHenry and Nunda Townships held Republican primary elections. The deadline for filing a notice to the County Clerk of such a primary election is November 15th.

No township Democratic Party central committee did so.

Parties in townships of more than 15,000 people may also select their candidates in a party caucus. If a caucus is held, state statute says it must be December 4th.

Dave McSweeney’s Complaint against Dee Beaubien’s State Rep. Petitions

July 12, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Brian Winter, Dave McSweeney, Dee Beaubien, John Fogarty, Mike Kasper, Nick Sauer, Petition, Petition Challenge, Richard Means

The last time that attorney Mike Kasper was involved in McHenry County affairs was when the Mike Madigan reapportionment committee held its first meeting, which was at Marengo High School. Here Democrat State Rep. Jack Franks is advised by Mike Kasper.

For those of you who would like to read the original document, GOP State Rep. candidate Dave McSweeney’s State Board of Elections complaint is below.

Dee Beaubien is not sending McHenry County Blog her press releases, so you’ll have to search elsewhere for her point of view.

It has been reported, however, that Mike Madigan attorney Mike Kasper is Beaubien’s attorney for the petition challenge.

Beaubien has been reported to have filed 3,500 signatures, while 1,500 were required.

McSweeney’s challenge is below:

McSweeney v. Beaubien ARDC Attorney #s 1874098 and 6257898

State of Illinois )
) SS.
County of Cook )

Before the Duly Constituted Electoral Board for the Hearing and Passing Upon of Objections to Nomination Papers of Independent Candidates for Election to the Office of Representative in the General Assembly for the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois Objections of David McSweeney to the Nomination Papers of Dee Beaubien for the Republican Party election for the Office of Representative in the General Assembly for the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, to be voted for at the General Election to be Held on November 6, 2012

Verified Objector’s Petition

David McSweeney, residing and registered to vote at 8 Hubbell Court, in the Village of Barrington Hills, County of Cook, State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as “Objector”) states that the Objector’s address is as stated, that the Objector is a legal voter of the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, and that the Objector’s interest in filing the following objections is that of a citizen desirous of seeing that the election laws governing the filing of nomination papers for the election of the Republican Party for the office of Representative in the General Assembly for the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, are properly complied with.

Therefore, the Objector makes the following objections to the nomination papers of Dee Beaubien as an Independent candidate for election to the office of Representative in the General Assembly for the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, to be voted for at the General Election to be held on November 6, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “Nomination Papers”).

The Objector states that said Nomination Papers are insufficient in fact and law for the following reasons:

1. Pursuant to Illinois law, nomination papers for Independent candidates for the office of Representative in the General Assembly for the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, to be voted for at the General Election to be held on November 6, 2012, must contain the true signatures of not fewer than 1500 qualified and duly registered legal voters residing in the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois.

In addition, said Nomination Papers must truthfully allege that the candidate is qualified for the office she seeks, be gathered and presented in the manner provided for in the Illinois Election Code, and otherwise must be executed in the form provided by law. The Nomination Papers herein purport to contain in excess of 1500 true signatures of such voters, and further purport to truthfully allege that the candidate is qualified for the office she seeks and purport to have been gathered, presented and executed in the manner required by the Illinois Election Code.

2. The candidate herein, Dee Beaubien, is not qualified under Illinois law to be an Independent candidate for the office she seeks because, during the current election cycle, she declared herself to be a member of and affiliated with the Republican Party and participated in the Republican nominating process by signing Republican Party nominating petitions. Appendix A. attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

3. The Nomination Papers herein contain a Statement of Candidacy which contains a false statement, to wit.:

“that I am a candidate for election to the office of Representative in the General Assembly in the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois . . . and that I am legally qualified . . . to hold such office . . .”

when, in fact, Dee Beaubien is not qualified to hold such office because she is not qualified to be elected to such office as an Independent candidate during the current election cycle said false statement being in violation of the Illinois Election Code.

4. Because of the candidate is not qualified to seek election to the office of Representative in the General Assembly as an Independent candidate, the Nomination Papers are invalid in their entirety.

5. Because the Nomination Papers contain a Statement of Candidacy which contains at least one material false statement, which false statement is, itself, contrary to and violative of Illinois law, the Nomination Papers are invalid in their entirety.

Wherefore, the Objector requests a hearing on the Objections set forth herein, an examination by the aforesaid Electoral Board (or its duly appointed agent or agents) of the official precinct registers and binders relating to voters in the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, (to the extent that such examination is pertinent to any of the matters alleged herein), a ruling that the Nomination Papers are insufficient in law and fact, and a ruling that the name of Dee Beaubien shall not appear on the ballot for the election to the office of Representative in the General Assembly for the 52nd Representative District of the State of Illinois, to be voted for at the General Election to be held on November 6, 2012.

David McSweeney, Objector

= = = = =

The following petitions for Republican candidates Brian Winter and Nick Sauer containing Beaubien’s signature are offered as evidence Beaubien is a Republican.

This petition for Lake County GOP State’s Attorney candidate Brian Winter is half of Appendix A.

This petition for Republican Lake County Board candidate Nick Sauer is the second half of Appendix A.

= = = = =

McSweeney’s attorneys are are John Fogarty and Rich Means.

Note that McSweeney brings the complaint himself, while most candidates find a straw man to create the illusion that the candidate is not involved with the petition challenge.

McSweeney Not Appealing Gaffney Ballot Placement Decision

January 31, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Danielle Rowe, Dave McSweeney, Kent Gaffney, Objection, Petition, Petition Challenge, Petition Passing, Richard Means

Dave McSweeney

Kent Gaffney

That’s what campaign manager Jim Thacker told me this morning.

“After reviewing our legal options and the timing of the process, we decided to no longer pursue an appeal of the decision.

“We remain satisfied in part with the State Board of Elections decision affirming our affidavits and the conclusion that the circulator who signed those petitions did so fraudulently.”

McSweeney attorney Rich Means sent the following letter to the Election Board yesterday:

“Please be advised that Objector McSweeney is not taking last week’s Board decision on judicial review. This decision came too close to the printing of Election Day ballots for us to have any reasonable expectation that judicial review could provide a meaningful remedy. We are convinced that any Circuit Court victory would be met with an immediate appeal.

“Because we have evidence of serious violations of Illinois and federal law by State employees, we have been and will continue to provide evidence to Legislative Inspector General Thomas J. Homer, to the United States Attorney, the Illinois Attorney General and to the State’s Attorneys in the 4 counties of the 52nd Representative District.”

Dave McSweeney, Kent Gaffney and Danielle Rowe are facing off in the 52nd District to fill the vacancy created when State Rep. Mark Beaubien died. Gaffney was appointed by Republican Party leaders to complete Beaubien’s term.

Barack Obama Ballot Challenge Dropped as Objectors Concede 3,000 Signatures Exist

January 29, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Ballot, Ballot Challenge, Barak Obama, Defend the Vote, Petition, Petition Challenge, Sharon Meroni

Here’s the scoop from Defend the Vote‘s Sharon Merconi:

“The past couple of days were very busy!

“As workers in the political field know all too well, the period just after filing for the ballot is a crazy time in the election cycle.”

Here’s what happened last Wednesday with Meroni, Cleveland and Boulton v Obama:


[It] “is a direct challenge to Mr. Obama’s application for ballot placement in the March 20, 2012 Illinois Primary, based on defects in his signature petitions. The Objectors withdrew their challenge on Wednesday January 25th.

“President Obama’s filed application for the Illinois Primary was surprisingly sloppy, as the signature petitions had numerous defects.

“The President filed the maximum limit of 5000 signatures, and needed 3000 valid ones to get on the Illinois ballot.

“By law, petitions must be consecutively numbered; he had a 20 page gap.

“Some petitions were missing the circulator signature, and some were not notarized.

“More importantly, our preliminary review indicated a higher than expected number of signatures were not by registered Illinois voters, as is required.

“Only this objection would attack enough signatures to potentially keep Mr. Obama off the ballot.

“The others were valid, but insufficient in scope of signatures to block him from the ballot.

“Bottom line, he must have 3000 valid signatures out of 5000 filed, and we had only 7 calendar days to conduct a review.

“Right off the bat, we lost two days by the fact that our order for ballot petitions was ‘mishandled’ by the ISBE.

“Near the close of business on Friday, January 6, 2012, we received 60 disks of ballot petitions of various candidates as requested, but upon return to the office we found that the disk for Barack Obama’s petitions was . . . BLANK!!!

“The difference was crucial to our efforts to review the Obama petitions with a sound and double-checked database analysis. As it was, we filed the Objection to the Obama petitions with seven minutes to spare at 4:53 pm on January 13, 2012.

“During the records review of the petition signatures, held at Illinois State Board of Election offices in downtown Chicago, ISBE clerks called ‘Checkers,’ rule on each challenged voter signature on a line by line basis though comparison with ISBE records on computer screens.

“In this case, over 3,000 individual reviews had to occur.

“On respective sides of the Checker are single representatives of each party, who notes each ruling, and asserts the party’s position.

“After six hours of checking at eight computer terminals, a substantial ongoing effort by 40 Board employees and volunteers, we determined in the final stages of the records check that Mr. Obama had reclaimed sufficient signatures to cross the 3000 mark required for ballot placement.

“Through close review and extensive use of pocket calculators, we had to face the mathematical reality that the President was certain to prevail on the challenge, and consequently instructed our counsel to file papers to withdraw the Objection to avoid using additional hours of effort and time.

“No further action will follow.”