McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Service Employees International Union’

SEIU Endorsements Include Dee Beaubien

August 06, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Andrew Gasser, Dee Beaubien, Endorsement, SEIU, Service Employees International Union

Fox River Grove’s Republican Precinct Committeeman Andrew Gasser has hooked a press release from the Service Employes International Union that says the union has endorsed Independent candidate for State Rep. Dee Beaubien.

Since the press release lists all the Illinois politicians endorsed, I thought it ought to be reproduced where it could be more easily found.  It’s below (emphasis added):

SEIU Illinois State Council Issues 2012 General Election Endorsements for Congressional and State Legislative Races By SEIU Illinois State Council

Published: Friday, Aug. 3, 2012 – 6:41 am

CHICAGO, Aug. 3, 2012 — /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — To advance the cause for economic equality and opportunity, the Service Employees International Union Illinois State Council announced its endorsements for the upcoming general election on November 6, 2012.

Representing more than 170,000 workers, the state’s largest labor union put its backing behind candidates who have demonstrated strong voting records on issues related to income equality, affordable housing, consumer protections, access to affordable health care and other needs that help keep working families and their communities stable, healthy and safe.

“Each of these candidates has championed the needs of the working families united in SEIU and the millions of people they serve every day as home care and child care providers, public employees, medical professionals, security guards, janitors, first responders and social service workers,” said Tom Balanoff, President of the SEIU Illinois State Council.

“The candidates that we endorsed today have demonstrated a commitment to working families and we’re proud to stand with them in their upcoming races,” said Keith Kelleher, Vice President of the SEIU Illinois State Council. “Our state and our country is at a major crossroads. This November, the fundamental question will be whether we elect leaders who believe in shared prosperity, economic and tax fairness, and who will fight to rebuild and strengthen working and middle class families from the ground up.”

“SEIU members have a proven track record of helping to elect candidates who fight for stronger communities and against growing income inequality. We look forward to continuing that trend,” said Christine Boardman, Treasurer of the the SEIU Illinois State Council.

The SEIU Illinois State Council does not issue endorsements in uncontested state legislative elections where there is an incumbent officeholder.

The candidates earning the endorsements were:

*denotes incumbent

U.S. House of Representatives 1st District—Bobby Rush (D)* 2nd District—Jesse Jackson Jr. (D)* 3rd District—Dan Lipinski (D)* 4th District—Luis Gutierrez (D)* 5th District—Mike Quigley (D)* 7th District—Danny Davis (D)* 8th District—Tammy Duckworth (D) 9th District—Jan Schakowsky (D)* 10th District – Brad Schneider (D) 11th District—Bill Foster (D)* 12th District—Bill Enyart (D) 13th District—David Gill (D) 17th District—Cheri Bustos (D)

Indiana US Senate Joe Donnelly (D)

Indiana US House of Representatives 1st District—Pete Visclosky (D)* 2nd District– Brendan Mullen (D) 5th District—Scott Reske (D) 7th District—Andre Carson (D)* 8th District—David Crooks (D)

Dee Beaubien announcing her candidacy.

Illinois House of Representatives 2nd District—Ed Acevedo (D)* 15th District—John D’Amico (D)* 16th District—Lou Lang (D)* 17th District—Laura Fine (D) 18th District—Robyn Gabel (D)* 20th District—Michael McAuliffe (R)* 22nd District—Michael J. Madigan (D)* 25th District—Barbara Flynn Currie (D)* 33rd District—Marcus Evans (D)* 35th District—Frances Ann Hurley (D) 40th District—Deborah Mell (D)* 45th District—Dennis Reboletti (R)* 46th District—Deborah O’Keefe Conroy (D) 52nd District—Dee Beaubien (independent) 55th District—Martin J. Moylan (D) 58th District—Scott Drury (D) 60th District—Rita Mayfield (D)* 72nd District—Patrick Verschoore (D)* 74th District—Donald L. Moffitt (R)* 76th District—Frank J. Mautino (D)* 77th District—Angelo “Skip” Saviano (R)* 78th District—Camille Lilly (D)* 79th District—Katherine “Kate” Cloonen (D) 84th District—Stephanie Kifowit (D) 91st District—Jennifer Groves Allison (D) 96th District—Sue Scherer (D) 98th District—Natalie A. Manley (D) 103rd District—Naomi Jakobsson (D)* 111th District—Daniel V. Beiser (D)* 113th District—Jay C. Hoffman (D) 114th District—Eddie Lee Jackson (D)* 117th District—John Bradley (D)*

Illinois State Senate 6th District—John Cullerton (D)* 8th District—Ira Silverstein (D)* 9th District—Dan Biss (D) 17th District—Donne Trotter (D)* 18th District—Bill Cunningham (D) 22nd District—Michael Noland (D)* 28th District—Dan Kotowski (D)* 29th District—Julie Morrison (D) 30th District—Terry Link (D)* 34th District—Steven “Steve” Stadelman (D) 36th District—Mike Jacobs (D)* 38th District—Christine Benson (D) 40th District—Toi W. Hutchinson (D)* 42nd District—Linda Holmes (D)* 43rd District—Pat McGuire (D)* 46th District—David Koehler (D)* 47th District—John Sullivan (D)* 48th District—Andy Manar (D) 49th District—Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant (D) 52nd District—Michael Frerichs (D)* 56th District—Bill Haine (D)* 57th District—James Clayborne (D)* 59th District—Gary Forby (D)*

SEIU Illinois State Council represents 170,000 members throughout Illinois. SEIU members in Illinois assist people with disabilities, care for senior citizens, educate youth, provide health care, protect public safety, clean and maintain businesses and buildings and much more.

Union Attacks Mike Tryon

April 24, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Home Health Care, Mike Tryon, Pat Quinn, Rod Blagojevich, SEIU, Service Employees International Union

"Call Rep. Michael Tryon," the post card urges, giving an 800 number. Click to enlarge.

Who says politicians only use direct mail during elections?

Here’s a piece from a labor union who was Governor Rod Blagojevich’s biggest contributor ($1.7 million).

Blagojevich returned the favor with an Executive Order allowing the organizing of 70-some thousand home health care workers, if memory serves me correctly.

And take a look at what a Pat Quinn Executive Order did in 2009.

The friend who gave me this took umbridge at the extent of wrinkles on the woman depicted on the post card. Click to enlarge.

While not technically a politician, the union is certainly intensely political.

With this mailing to Tryon and, presumably other legislators, in support of higher taxes, SEIU is continuing its symbiotic relationship with Quinn.

I was the one that talked to Jim Thompson Budget Bureau about backing off from the Administration’s opposition to the bill after it came up in the Human Services Committee when Eugenia Chapman headed it in 1977.

The opposition was purely fiscally based.

I convinced them to support the bill if it were only funded for the last six months of the next fiscal year, when everyone was predicting that incoming taxes would increase.

I had just gotten back from my only foreign junket.  It was to a NATO citizens conference, sponsored by the American Young Political Leaders.  Then-State Senator Mark Rhoads had the slot, but decided to stay home and campaign.  Without a fall opponent, it was ready-made for me.

One of the countries we visited was Denmark.  I met a young Socialist Member of Parliament at a reception in a home on the North Shore of Copenhagen.  She told me how her government had just concluded that it was cheaper to keep people in their homes than to put them in nursing homes.  More humane, too.

The idea impressed me and when a North Side Democrat introduced a bill to create home health care I played a role in getting it passed.

Liberals in that part of Denmark, by the way, are called “Railroad Liberals.”  In the Chicago area, we call them “Limousine Liberals.”

Randy Hultgren Calls Out Bill Foster for “Multiple Generation Theft”

March 22, 2010 By: Cal Skinner Category: 14th Congressional District, Barack Obama, Bill Foster, Executive Order, Health Care, Health Care Refrom, Health Insurance, Randy Hultgren, SEIU, Service Employees International Union

On the Five O'Clock News on Channel 7 came the announcement that 14th District Congressman Bill Foster would vote for President Barack Obama's Health Care bill. Foster had been the subject of Randall Road TEA Party demonstrations. Newly-elected Chicago Congressman Mike Quigley jumped on board as well. Of significance is that he was a holdout based on wanting abortion rights to be protected in the bill. Quigley's decision came after Obama announced he would sign an Executive Order that prohibite money in his Health Care proposal to be spent on abortions. (Read between the disappearing lines of said Executive Order.)

Sent last night after the health care vote in the U.S. House, State Senator Randy Hultgren, the Republican challenger to 14th District Democrat Bill Foster, this press release says Foster is “bought and paid for” by the Service Employees International Union.

Bill Foster’s Vote Betrays the Trust of the 14th District

Dear Friend:

Tonight, Bill Foster dealt the 14th Congressional District a devastating blow!

Foster’s vote to takeover health care doesn’t only run contrary to the wishes of his constituents, it delivers on the commitment he made to HIS real boss, Andy Stern, head of the Service Employees International Union.

In the Washington Post this week, Stern boasted of the debt owed to SEIU by Foster saying that “Foster, who we ran a significant independent expenditure for, we’re telling him what it is our workers thought they were working for him for” in reference to the Pelosi/Reid health care bill.

It is clear, by the admission of SEIU to the Washington Post of access and influence, that Foster is bought and paid for by special interests at the expense of the residents of the 14th Congressional District!

Not only did Foster commit this heinous act of multi-generational theft, harming residents of Illinois by taking away Medicare benefits to seniors and shifting unknown costs to our children and grandchildren, he also committed another heinous act against the unborn.

In a later vote, Foster voted to uphold Nancy Pelosi’s commitment to government-funded abortion!

I am fighting to serve in Congress so that we STOP the special interest buying spree of Congress, STOP the government from paying for abortions and STOP the abuse of the taxpayer’s money!

Please support me in my fight against this union-funded, out-of-touch liberal who puts the interests of the SEIU and Nancy Pelosi before the interests of you by donating $5, $25, $50, $100 or whatever you can afford to contribute.

Thank you for your help in this crucial fight for our future!

Sincerely,
Randy Hultgren

P.S. I need your support today to stop these horrendous pay-for-play tactics being used by my well-funded opponent!
CLICK HERE TO  CONTRIBUTE

The Charges Against Rod Blagojevich: I’m For Sale

December 09, 2008 By: Cal Skinner Category: Chicago Corruption, Chicago Tribune, John Harris, John McCormick., Rod Blagojevich, Service Employees International Union

What follows is the press release from U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald about the arrest of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and his chief of staff John Harris. The Chicago Tribune became part of the story when the Governor tried to tie state financial aid to the Cubs ball park to a less harsh editorial policy.

What Blagojevich is charged with makes former Governor George Ryan’s crimes pale in comparison.

In the report of Blagojevich’s brokering of President-Elect Barack Obama’s U.S. Senate seat, the press release refers to the gender of Candidate 1, who is close to the Service Employees International Union. My guess is that the reference is to Congresswoman Jan Shakowsky, who is tight with the SEIU, but, of course, neither she nor the SEIU have been accused of any wrong-doing.

= = = = =
Sources are reporting that Candidate 1 is Valerie Jarrett. My mistake.
= = = = =

And Blagojevich’s attempt to have Chicago Tribune editorial writers fired verges on tactics of which leaders of the old Soviet Union would approve.

ILLINOIS GOV. ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH AND HIS CHIEF OF STAFF JOHN HARRIS ARRESTED ON FEDERAL CORRUPTION CHARGES

Blagojevich and aide allegedly conspired to sell U.S. Senate appointment, engaged in “pay-to-play” schemes and threatened to withhold state assistance to Tribune Company for Wrigley Field to induce purge of newspaper editorial writers

CHICAGO – Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich and his Chief of Staff, John Harris, were arrested today by FBI agents on federal corruption charges alleging that they and others

  • are engaging in ongoing criminal activity:
  • conspiring to obtain personal financial benefits for Blagojevich by leveraging his sole authority to appoint a United States Senator;
  • threatening to withhold substantial state assistance to the Tribune Company in connection with the sale of Wrigley Field to induce the firing of Chicago Tribune editorial board members sharply critical of Blagojevich;
  • and to obtain campaign contributions in exchange for official actions – both historically and now in a push before a new state ethics law takes effect January 1, 2009.

Blagojevich, 51, and Harris, 46, both of Chicago, were each charged with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and solicitation of bribery.

They were charged in a two-count criminal complaint that was sworn out on Sunday and unsealed today following their arrests, which occurred without incident, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Both men were expected to appear later today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

A 76-page FBI affidavit alleges that Blagojevich was intercepted on court-authorized wiretaps during the last month conspiring to sell or trade Illinois’ U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama for financial and other personal benefits for himself and his wife. At various times, in exchange for the Senate appointment, Blagojevich discussed obtaining:

  • substantial salary for himself at a either a non-profit foundation or an organization affiliated with labor unions;
  • placing his wife on paid corporate boards where he speculated she might garner as much as $150,000 a year;
  • promises of campaign funds – including cash up front; and
  • a cabinet post or ambassadorship for himself

Just last week, on December 4, Blagojevich allegedly told an advisor that he might “get some (money) up front, maybe” from Senate Candidate 5, if he named Senate Candidate 5 to the Senate seat, to insure that Senate Candidate 5 kept a promise about raising money for Blagojevich if he ran for re-election. In a recorded conversation on October 31, Blagojevich claimed he was approached by an associate of Senate Candidate 5 as follows:

“We were approached ‘pay to play.’ That, you know, he’d raise 500 grand. An emissary came. Then the other guy would raise a million, if I made him (Senate Candidate 5) a Senator.”

On November 7, while talking on the phone about the Senate seat with Harris and an advisor, Blagojevich said he needed to consider his family and that he is “financially” hurting, the affidavit states. Harris allegedly said that they were considering what would help the “financial security” of the Blagojevich family and what will keep Blagojevich “politically viable.” Blagojevich stated,

“I want to make money,”

adding later that he is interested in making $250,000 to $300,000 a year, the complaint alleges.

On November 10, in a lengthy telephone call with numerous advisors that included discussion about Blagojevich obtaining a lucrative job with a union-affiliated organization in exchange for appointing a particular Senate Candidate whom he believed was favored by the President-elect and which is described in more detail below, Blagojevich and others discussed various ways Blagojevich could “monetize” the relationships he has made as governor to make money after leaving that office.

Mr. Fitzgerald said,

“The breadth of corruption laid out in these charges is staggering. They allege that Blagojevich put a ‘for sale’ sign on the naming of a United States Senator; involved himself personally in pay-to-play schemes with the urgency of a salesman meeting his annual sales target; and corruptly used his office in an effort to trample editorial voices of criticism. The citizens of Illinois deserve public officials who act solely in the public’s interest, without putting a price tag on government appointments, contracts and decisions.”

Mr. Grant said:

“Many, including myself, thought that the recent conviction of a former governor would usher in a new era of honesty and reform in Illinois politics. Clearly, the charges announced today reveal that the office of the Governor has become nothing more than a vehicle for self-enrichment, unrestricted by party affiliation and taking Illinois politics to a new low.”

Mr. Fitzgerald and Mr. Grant thanked the Chicago offices of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General for assisting in the ongoing investigation. The probe is part of Operation Board Games, a five-year-old public corruption investigation of pay-to-play schemes, including insider-dealing, influence-peddling and kickbacks involving private interests and public duties.

Federal agents today also executed search warrants at the offices of Friends of Blagojevich located at 4147 North Ravenswood, Suite 300, and at the Thompson Center office of Deputy Governor A.

Pay-to-Play Schemes

The charges include historical allegations that Blagojevich and Harris schemed with others – including previously convicted defendants Antoin Rezko, Stuart Levine, Ali Ata and others – since becoming governor in 2002 to obtain and attempt to obtain financial benefits for himself, his family and third parties, including his campaign committee, Friends of Blagojevich, in exchange for appointments to state boards and commissions, state employment, state contracts and access to state funds. A portion of the affidavit recounts the testimony of various witnesses at Rezko’s trial earlier this year.

The charges focus, however, on events since October when the Government obtained information that Blagojevich and Fundraiser A, who is chairman of Friends of Blagojevich (Brother Rob Blagojevich is the PAC’s chairman and Stephen E Caboor is the treasurer, according to the State Board of Elections website), were accelerating Blagojevich’s allegedly corrupt fund-raising activities to accumulate as much money as possible this year before a new state ethics law would severely curtail Blagojevich’s ability to raise money from individuals and entities that have existing contracts worth more than $50,000 with the State of Illinois.

Agents learned that Blagojevich was seeking approximately $2.5 million in campaign contributions by the end of the year, principally from or through individuals or entities – many of which have received state contacts or appointments – identified on a list maintained by Friends of Blagojevich, which the FBI has obtained.

The affidavit details multiple incidents involving efforts by Blagojevich to obtain campaign contributions in connection with his official actions as governor, including these three in early October:

  • After an October 6 meeting with Harris and Individuals A and B, during which Individual B sought state help with a business venture, Blagojevich told Individual A to approach Individual B about raising $100,000 for Friends of Blagojevich this year. Individual A said he later learned that Blagojevich reached out directly to Individual B to ask about holding a fund-raiser;
  • Also on October 6, Blagojevich told Individual A that he expected Highway Contractor 1 to raise $500,000 in contributions and that he was willing to commit additional state money to a Tollway project – beyond $1.8 billion that Blagojevich announced on October15 – but was waiting to see how much money the contractor raised for Friends of Blagojevich; and
  • On October 8, Blagojevich told Individual A that he wanted to obtain a $50,000 contribution from Hospital Executive 1, the chief executive officer of Children’s Memorial Hospital in Chicago, which had recently received a commitment of $8 million in state funds. When the contribution was not forthcoming, Blagojevich discussed with Deputy Governor A the feasibility of rescinding the funding.
  • On October 21, the Government obtained a court order authorizing the interception of conversations in both a personal office and a conference room used by Blagojevich at the offices of Friends of Blagojevich. The FBI began intercepting conversations in those rooms on the morning of October 22. A second court order was obtained last month allowing those interceptions to continue. On October 29, a court order was signed authorizing the interception of conversations on a hardline telephone used by Blagojevich at his home. That wiretap was extended for 30 days on November 26, according to the affidavit.

Another alleged example of a pay-to-play scheme was captured in separate telephone conversations that Blagojevich had with Fundraiser A on November 13 and Lobbyist 1 on December 3. Lobbyist 1 was reporting to Blagojevich about his efforts to collect a contribution from Contributor 1 and related that he “got in his face” to make it clear to Contributor 1 that a commitment to make a campaign contribution had to be done now, before there could be some skittishness over the timing of the contribution and Blagojevich signing a bill that would benefit Contributor 1. Blagojevich commented to Lobbyist 1 “good” and “good job.” The bill in question, which is awaiting Blagojevich ’s signature, is believed to be legislation that directs a percentage of casino revenue to the horse racing industry.

Sale of U.S. Senate Appointment

Regarding the Senate seat, the charges allege that Blagojevich, Harris and others have engaged and are engaging in efforts to obtain personal gain, including financial gain, to benefit Blagojevich and his family through corruptly using Blagojevich’s sole authority to appoint a successor to the unexpired term of the President-elect’s former Senate seat, which he resigned effective November 16.

The affidavit details numerous conversations about the Senate seat between November 3 and December 5. In these conversations, Blagojevich repeatedly discussed the attributes of potential candidates, including their abilities to benefit the people of Illinois, and the financial and political benefits he and his wife could receive if he appointed various of the possible candidates.

Throughout the intercepted conversations, Blagojevich also allegedly spent significant time weighing the option of appointing himself to the open Senate seat and expressed a variety of reasons for doing so, including:

  • frustration at being “stuck” as governor;
  • a belief that he will be able to obtain greater resources if he is indicted as a sitting Senator as opposed to a sitting governor;
  • a desire to remake his image in consideration of a possible run for President in 2016;
  • avoiding impeachment by the Illinois legislature;
  • making corporate contacts that would be of value to him after leaving public office;
  • facilitating his wife’s employment as a lobbyist; and
  • generating speaking fees should he decide to leave public office.

In the earliest intercepted conversation about the Senate seat described in the affidavit, Blagojevich told Deputy Governor A on November 3 that if he is not going to get anything of value for the open seat, then he will take it for himself:

“if . . . they’re not going to offer anything of any value, then I might just take it.”

Later that day, speaking to Advisor A, Blagojevich said:

“I’m going to keep this Senate option for me a real possibility, you know, and therefore I can drive a hard bargain.”

He added later that the seat

“is a [expletive] valuable thing, you just don’t give it away for nothing.”

Over the next couple of days – Election Day and the day after – Blagojevich was captured discussing with Deputy Governor A whether he could obtain a cabinet position, such as Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Department of Energy or various ambassadorships. In a conversation with Harris on November 4, Blagojevich analogized his situation to that of a sports agent shopping a potential free agent to the highest bidder. The day after the election, Harris allegedly suggested to Blagojevich that the President-elect could make him the head of a private foundation.

Later on November 5, Blagojevich said to Advisor A,

“I’ve got this thing and it’s [expletive] golden, and, uh, uh, I’m just not giving it up for [expletive] nothing. I’m not gonna do it. And, and I can always use it. I can parachute me there,”

the affidavit states.

Two days later, in a three-way call with Harris and Advisor B, a consultant in Washington, Blagojevich and the others allegedly discussed the prospect of a three-way deal for the Senate appointment involving an organization called

“Change to Win,”

which is affiliated with various unions including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

On November 10, Blagojevich, his wife, Harris, Governor General Counsel, Advisor B and other Washington-based advisors participated at different times in a two-hour phone call in which they allegedly discussed, among other things, a deal involving the SEIU. Harris said they could work out a deal with the union and the President-elect where SEIU could help the President-elect with Blagojevich’s appointment of Senate Candidate 1, while Blagojevich would obtain a position as the National Director of the Change to Win campaign and SEIU would get something favorable from the President-elect in the future. Also during that call, Blagojevich agreed it was unlikely that the President-elect would name him Secretary of Health and Human Services or give him an ambassadorship because of all of the negative publicity surrounding him.

In a conversation with Harris on November 11, the charges state, Blagojevich said he knew that the President-elect wanted Senate Candidate 1 for the open seat but

“they’re not willing to give me anything except appreciation. [Expletive] them.”

Earlier in that conversation, Blagojevich suggested starting a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization, which he could head and engage in political activity and lobbying. In that conversation with Harris and other discussions with him and others over the next couple of days, Blagojevich suggested by name several well-known, wealthy individuals who could be prevailed upon to seed such an organization with $10-$15 million, and suggesting that he could take the organization’s reins when he is no longer governor, according to the affidavit.

On November 12, Blagojevich spoke with SEIU Official who was in Washington. This conversation occurred about a week after Blagojevich had met with SEIU Official to discuss the Senate seat, with the understanding that the union official was an emissary to discuss Senate Candidate 1′s interest in the Senate seat. During the November 12 conversation, Blagojevich allegedly explained the non-profit organization idea to SEIU Official and said that it could help Senate Candidate 1. The union official agreed to “

put that flag up and see where it goes,”

although the official also had said he wasn’t certain if Senate Candidate 1 wanted the official to keep pushing her candidacy. Senate Candidate 1 eventually removed herself from consideration for the open seat.

Also on November 12, in a conversation with Harris, the complaint affidavit states that Blagojevich said his decision about the open Senate seat will be based on three criteria in the following order of importance:

“our legal situation, our personal situation, my political situation. This decision, like every other one, needs to be based upon that. Legal. Personal. Political.”

Harris said:

“legal is the hardest one to satisfy.”

Blagojevich said that his legal problems could be solved by naming himself to the Senate seat.

As recently as December 4, in separate conversations with Advisor B and Fundraiser A, Blagojevich said that he was “elevating” Senate Candidate 5 on the list of candidates because, among other reasons, if Blagojevich ran for re-election, Senate Candidate 5 would “raise[] money” for him. Blagojevich said that he might be able to cut a deal with Senate Candidate 5 that provided Blagojevich with something “tangible up front.”

Noting that he was going to meet with Senate Candidate 5 in the next few days, Blagojevich told Fundraiser A to reach out to an intermediary (Individual D), from whom Blagojevich is attempting to obtain campaign contributions and who Blagojevich believes is close to Senate Candidate 5. Blagojevich told Fundraiser A to tell Individual D that Senate Candidate 5 was a very realistic candidate but Blagojevich was getting a lot of pressure not to appoint Senate Candidate 5, according to the affidavit.

Blagojevich allegedly told Fundraiser A to tell Individual D that if Senate Candidate 5 is going to be chosen,

“some of this stuff’s gotta start happening now . . . right now . . . and we gotta see it.”

Blagojevich continued,

“You gotta be careful how you express that and assume everybody’s listening, the whole world is listening. You hear me?”

Blagojevich further directed Fundraiser A to talk to Individual D in person, not by phone, and to communicate the “urgency” of the situation.

Blagojevich spoke to Fundraiser A again the next day, December 5, and discussed that day’s Chicago Tribune front page article stating that Blagojevich had recently been surreptitiously recorded as part of the ongoing criminal investigation. Blagojevich instructed Fundraiser A to “undo your [Individual D] thing,” and Fundraiser A confirmed it would be undone, the complaint alleges.

Also on December 5, Blagojevich and three others allegedly discussed whether to move money out of the Friends of Blagojevich campaign fund to avoid having the money frozen by federal authorities and also considered the possibility of prepaying the money to Blagojevich’s criminal defense attorney with an understanding that the attorney would donate the money back at a later time if it was not needed. They also discussed opening a new fund raising account named Citizens for Blagojevich with new contributions.

Misuse of State Funding To Induce Firing of Chicago Tribune Editorial Writers

According to the affidavit, intercepted phone calls revealed that the Tribune Company, which owns the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Cubs, has explored the possibility of obtaining assistance from the Illinois Finance Authority (IFA) relating to the Tribune Company’s efforts to sell the Cubs and the financing or sale of Wrigley Field.

In a November 6 phone call, Harris explained to Blagojevich that the deal the Tribune Company was trying to get through the IFA was basically a tax mitigation scheme in which the IFA would own title to Wrigley Field and the Tribune would not have to pay capital gains tax, which Harris estimated would save the company approximately $100 million.

Intercepted calls allegedly show that Blagojevich directed Harris to inform Tribune Owner and an associate, identified as Tribune Financial Advisor, that state financial assistance would be withheld unless members of the Chicago Tribune’s editorial board were fired, primarily because Blagojevich viewed them as driving discussion of his possible impeachment.

In a November 4 phone call, Blagojevich allegedly told Harris that he should say to Tribune Financial Advisor, Cubs Chairman and Tribune Owner,

“our recommendation is fire all those [expletive] people, get ‘em the [expletive] out of there and get us some editorial support.”

On November 6, the day of a Tribune editorial critical of Blagojevich , Harris told Blagojevich that he told Tribune Financial Advisor the previous day that things “look like they could move ahead fine but, you know, there is a risk that all of this is going to get derailed by your own editorial page.” Harris also told Blagojevich that he was meeting with Tribune Financial Advisor on November 10.

In a November 11 intercepted call, Harris allegedly told Blagojevich that Tribune Financial Advisor talked to Tribune Owner and Tribune Owner

“got the message and is very sensitive to the issue.”

Harris told Blagojevich that according to Tribune Financial Advisor, there would be

“certain corporate reorganizations and budget cuts coming and, reading between the lines, he’s going after that section.”

Blagojevich allegedly responded.

“Oh. That’s fantastic.”

After further discussion, Blagojevich said,

“Wow. Okay, keep our fingers crossed. You’re the man. Good job, John.”

In a further conversation on November 21, Harris told Blagojevich that he had singled out to Tribune Financial Advisor the Tribune’s deputy editorial page editor, John McCormick,

“as somebody who was the most biased and unfair.”

After hearing that Tribune Financial Advisor had assured Harris that the Tribune would be making changes affecting the editorial board, Blagojevich allegedly had a series of conversations with Chicago Cubs representatives regarding efforts to provide state financing for Wrigley Field.

On November 30, Blagojevich spoke with the president of a Chicago-area sports consulting firm, who indicated that he was working with the Cubs on matters involving Wrigley Field. Blagojevich and Sports Consultant discussed the importance of getting the IFA transaction approved at the agency’s December or January meeting because Blagojevich was contemplating leaving office in early January and his IFA appointees would still be in place to approve the deal, the charges allege.

The Government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Reid Schar, Carrie Hamilton and Christopher Niewoehner.

If convicted, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, while solicitation of bribery carries a maximum of 10 years in prison, and each count carries a maximum fine of $250,000. The Court, however, would determine the appropriate sentence to be imposed under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The public is reminded that a complaint contain only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

= = = = =
The campaign pieces are from 2006. The photo of Governor Rod Blagojevich being adored was in the Tribune on March 8, 2007. I guess it wasn’t enough to offset the later editorials calling for his removal.

The Charges Against Rod Blagojevich: I’m For Sale

December 09, 2008 By: Cal Skinner Category: Chicago Corruption, Chicago Tribune, John Harris, John McCormick., Rod Blagojevich, Service Employees International Union

What follows is the press release from U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald about the arrest of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and his chief of staff John Harris. The Chicago Tribune became part of the story when the Governor tried to tie state financial aid to the Cubs ball park to a less harsh editorial policy.

What Blagojevich is charged with makes former Governor George Ryan’s crimes pale in comparison.

In the report of Blagojevich’s brokering of President-Elect Barack Obama’s U.S. Senate seat, the press release refers to the gender of Candidate 1, who is close to the Service Employees International Union. My guess is that the reference is to Congresswoman Jan Shakowsky, who is tight with the SEIU, but, of course, neither she nor the SEIU have been accused of any wrong-doing.

= = = = =
Sources are reporting that Candidate 1 is Valerie Jarrett. My mistake.
= = = = =

And Blagojevich’s attempt to have Chicago Tribune editorial writers fired verges on tactics of which leaders of the old Soviet Union would approve.

ILLINOIS GOV. ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH AND HIS CHIEF OF STAFF JOHN HARRIS ARRESTED ON FEDERAL CORRUPTION CHARGES

Blagojevich and aide allegedly conspired to sell U.S. Senate appointment, engaged in “pay-to-play” schemes and threatened to withhold state assistance to Tribune Company for Wrigley Field to induce purge of newspaper editorial writers

CHICAGO – Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich and his Chief of Staff, John Harris, were arrested today by FBI agents on federal corruption charges alleging that they and others

  • are engaging in ongoing criminal activity:
  • conspiring to obtain personal financial benefits for Blagojevich by leveraging his sole authority to appoint a United States Senator;
  • threatening to withhold substantial state assistance to the Tribune Company in connection with the sale of Wrigley Field to induce the firing of Chicago Tribune editorial board members sharply critical of Blagojevich;
  • and to obtain campaign contributions in exchange for official actions – both historically and now in a push before a new state ethics law takes effect January 1, 2009.

Blagojevich, 51, and Harris, 46, both of Chicago, were each charged with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and solicitation of bribery.

They were charged in a two-count criminal complaint that was sworn out on Sunday and unsealed today following their arrests, which occurred without incident, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Both men were expected to appear later today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

A 76-page FBI affidavit alleges that Blagojevich was intercepted on court-authorized wiretaps during the last month conspiring to sell or trade Illinois’ U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama for financial and other personal benefits for himself and his wife. At various times, in exchange for the Senate appointment, Blagojevich discussed obtaining:

  • substantial salary for himself at a either a non-profit foundation or an organization affiliated with labor unions;
  • placing his wife on paid corporate boards where he speculated she might garner as much as $150,000 a year;
  • promises of campaign funds – including cash up front; and
  • a cabinet post or ambassadorship for himself

Just last week, on December 4, Blagojevich allegedly told an advisor that he might “get some (money) up front, maybe” from Senate Candidate 5, if he named Senate Candidate 5 to the Senate seat, to insure that Senate Candidate 5 kept a promise about raising money for Blagojevich if he ran for re-election. In a recorded conversation on October 31, Blagojevich claimed he was approached by an associate of Senate Candidate 5 as follows:

“We were approached ‘pay to play.’ That, you know, he’d raise 500 grand. An emissary came. Then the other guy would raise a million, if I made him (Senate Candidate 5) a Senator.”

On November 7, while talking on the phone about the Senate seat with Harris and an advisor, Blagojevich said he needed to consider his family and that he is “financially” hurting, the affidavit states. Harris allegedly said that they were considering what would help the “financial security” of the Blagojevich family and what will keep Blagojevich “politically viable.” Blagojevich stated,

“I want to make money,”

adding later that he is interested in making $250,000 to $300,000 a year, the complaint alleges.

On November 10, in a lengthy telephone call with numerous advisors that included discussion about Blagojevich obtaining a lucrative job with a union-affiliated organization in exchange for appointing a particular Senate Candidate whom he believed was favored by the President-elect and which is described in more detail below, Blagojevich and others discussed various ways Blagojevich could “monetize” the relationships he has made as governor to make money after leaving that office.

Mr. Fitzgerald said,

“The breadth of corruption laid out in these charges is staggering. They allege that Blagojevich put a ‘for sale’ sign on the naming of a United States Senator; involved himself personally in pay-to-play schemes with the urgency of a salesman meeting his annual sales target; and corruptly used his office in an effort to trample editorial voices of criticism. The citizens of Illinois deserve public officials who act solely in the public’s interest, without putting a price tag on government appointments, contracts and decisions.”

Mr. Grant said:

“Many, including myself, thought that the recent conviction of a former governor would usher in a new era of honesty and reform in Illinois politics. Clearly, the charges announced today reveal that the office of the Governor has become nothing more than a vehicle for self-enrichment, unrestricted by party affiliation and taking Illinois politics to a new low.”

Mr. Fitzgerald and Mr. Grant thanked the Chicago offices of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General for assisting in the ongoing investigation. The probe is part of Operation Board Games, a five-year-old public corruption investigation of pay-to-play schemes, including insider-dealing, influence-peddling and kickbacks involving private interests and public duties.

Federal agents today also executed search warrants at the offices of Friends of Blagojevich located at 4147 North Ravenswood, Suite 300, and at the Thompson Center office of Deputy Governor A.

Pay-to-Play Schemes

The charges include historical allegations that Blagojevich and Harris schemed with others – including previously convicted defendants Antoin Rezko, Stuart Levine, Ali Ata and others – since becoming governor in 2002 to obtain and attempt to obtain financial benefits for himself, his family and third parties, including his campaign committee, Friends of Blagojevich, in exchange for appointments to state boards and commissions, state employment, state contracts and access to state funds. A portion of the affidavit recounts the testimony of various witnesses at Rezko’s trial earlier this year.

The charges focus, however, on events since October when the Government obtained information that Blagojevich and Fundraiser A, who is chairman of Friends of Blagojevich (Brother Rob Blagojevich is the PAC’s chairman and Stephen E Caboor is the treasurer, according to the State Board of Elections website), were accelerating Blagojevich’s allegedly corrupt fund-raising activities to accumulate as much money as possible this year before a new state ethics law would severely curtail Blagojevich’s ability to raise money from individuals and entities that have existing contracts worth more than $50,000 with the State of Illinois.

Agents learned that Blagojevich was seeking approximately $2.5 million in campaign contributions by the end of the year, principally from or through individuals or entities – many of which have received state contacts or appointments – identified on a list maintained by Friends of Blagojevich, which the FBI has obtained.

The affidavit details multiple incidents involving efforts by Blagojevich to obtain campaign contributions in connection with his official actions as governor, including these three in early October:

  • After an October 6 meeting with Harris and Individuals A and B, during which Individual B sought state help with a business venture, Blagojevich told Individual A to approach Individual B about raising $100,000 for Friends of Blagojevich this year. Individual A said he later learned that Blagojevich reached out directly to Individual B to ask about holding a fund-raiser;
  • Also on October 6, Blagojevich told Individual A that he expected Highway Contractor 1 to raise $500,000 in contributions and that he was willing to commit additional state money to a Tollway project – beyond $1.8 billion that Blagojevich announced on October15 – but was waiting to see how much money the contractor raised for Friends of Blagojevich; and
  • On October 8, Blagojevich told Individual A that he wanted to obtain a $50,000 contribution from Hospital Executive 1, the chief executive officer of Children’s Memorial Hospital in Chicago, which had recently received a commitment of $8 million in state funds. When the contribution was not forthcoming, Blagojevich discussed with Deputy Governor A the feasibility of rescinding the funding.
  • On October 21, the Government obtained a court order authorizing the interception of conversations in both a personal office and a conference room used by Blagojevich at the offices of Friends of Blagojevich. The FBI began intercepting conversations in those rooms on the morning of October 22. A second court order was obtained last month allowing those interceptions to continue. On October 29, a court order was signed authorizing the interception of conversations on a hardline telephone used by Blagojevich at his home. That wiretap was extended for 30 days on November 26, according to the affidavit.

Another alleged example of a pay-to-play scheme was captured in separate telephone conversations that Blagojevich had with Fundraiser A on November 13 and Lobbyist 1 on December 3. Lobbyist 1 was reporting to Blagojevich about his efforts to collect a contribution from Contributor 1 and related that he “got in his face” to make it clear to Contributor 1 that a commitment to make a campaign contribution had to be done now, before there could be some skittishness over the timing of the contribution and Blagojevich signing a bill that would benefit Contributor 1. Blagojevich commented to Lobbyist 1 “good” and “good job.” The bill in question, which is awaiting Blagojevich ’s signature, is believed to be legislation that directs a percentage of casino revenue to the horse racing industry.

Sale of U.S. Senate Appointment

Regarding the Senate seat, the charges allege that Blagojevich, Harris and others have engaged and are engaging in efforts to obtain personal gain, including financial gain, to benefit Blagojevich and his family through corruptly using Blagojevich’s sole authority to appoint a successor to the unexpired term of the President-elect’s former Senate seat, which he resigned effective November 16.

The affidavit details numerous conversations about the Senate seat between November 3 and December 5. In these conversations, Blagojevich repeatedly discussed the attributes of potential candidates, including their abilities to benefit the people of Illinois, and the financial and political benefits he and his wife could receive if he appointed various of the possible candidates.

Throughout the intercepted conversations, Blagojevich also allegedly spent significant time weighing the option of appointing himself to the open Senate seat and expressed a variety of reasons for doing so, including:

  • frustration at being “stuck” as governor;
  • a belief that he will be able to obtain greater resources if he is indicted as a sitting Senator as opposed to a sitting governor;
  • a desire to remake his image in consideration of a possible run for President in 2016;
  • avoiding impeachment by the Illinois legislature;
  • making corporate contacts that would be of value to him after leaving public office;
  • facilitating his wife’s employment as a lobbyist; and
  • generating speaking fees should he decide to leave public office.

In the earliest intercepted conversation about the Senate seat described in the affidavit, Blagojevich told Deputy Governor A on November 3 that if he is not going to get anything of value for the open seat, then he will take it for himself:

“if . . . they’re not going to offer anything of any value, then I might just take it.”

Later that day, speaking to Advisor A, Blagojevich said:

“I’m going to keep this Senate option for me a real possibility, you know, and therefore I can drive a hard bargain.”

He added later that the seat

“is a [expletive] valuable thing, you just don’t give it away for nothing.”

Over the next couple of days – Election Day and the day after – Blagojevich was captured discussing with Deputy Governor A whether he could obtain a cabinet position, such as Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Department of Energy or various ambassadorships. In a conversation with Harris on November 4, Blagojevich analogized his situation to that of a sports agent shopping a potential free agent to the highest bidder. The day after the election, Harris allegedly suggested to Blagojevich that the President-elect could make him the head of a private foundation.

Later on November 5, Blagojevich said to Advisor A,

“I’ve got this thing and it’s [expletive] golden, and, uh, uh, I’m just not giving it up for [expletive] nothing. I’m not gonna do it. And, and I can always use it. I can parachute me there,”

the affidavit states.

Two days later, in a three-way call with Harris and Advisor B, a consultant in Washington, Blagojevich and the others allegedly discussed the prospect of a three-way deal for the Senate appointment involving an organization called

“Change to Win,”

which is affiliated with various unions including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

On November 10, Blagojevich, his wife, Harris, Governor General Counsel, Advisor B and other Washington-based advisors participated at different times in a two-hour phone call in which they allegedly discussed, among other things, a deal involving the SEIU. Harris said they could work out a deal with the union and the President-elect where SEIU could help the President-elect with Blagojevich’s appointment of Senate Candidate 1, while Blagojevich would obtain a position as the National Director of the Change to Win campaign and SEIU would get something favorable from the President-elect in the future. Also during that call, Blagojevich agreed it was unlikely that the President-elect would name him Secretary of Health and Human Services or give him an ambassadorship because of all of the negative publicity surrounding him.

In a conversation with Harris on November 11, the charges state, Blagojevich said he knew that the President-elect wanted Senate Candidate 1 for the open seat but

“they’re not willing to give me anything except appreciation. [Expletive] them.”

Earlier in that conversation, Blagojevich suggested starting a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization, which he could head and engage in political activity and lobbying. In that conversation with Harris and other discussions with him and others over the next couple of days, Blagojevich suggested by name several well-known, wealthy individuals who could be prevailed upon to seed such an organization with $10-$15 million, and suggesting that he could take the organization’s reins when he is no longer governor, according to the affidavit.

On November 12, Blagojevich spoke with SEIU Official who was in Washington. This conversation occurred about a week after Blagojevich had met with SEIU Official to discuss the Senate seat, with the understanding that the union official was an emissary to discuss Senate Candidate 1′s interest in the Senate seat. During the November 12 conversation, Blagojevich allegedly explained the non-profit organization idea to SEIU Official and said that it could help Senate Candidate 1. The union official agreed to “

put that flag up and see where it goes,”

although the official also had said he wasn’t certain if Senate Candidate 1 wanted the official to keep pushing her candidacy. Senate Candidate 1 eventually removed herself from consideration for the open seat.

Also on November 12, in a conversation with Harris, the complaint affidavit states that Blagojevich said his decision about the open Senate seat will be based on three criteria in the following order of importance:

“our legal situation, our personal situation, my political situation. This decision, like every other one, needs to be based upon that. Legal. Personal. Political.”

Harris said:

“legal is the hardest one to satisfy.”

Blagojevich said that his legal problems could be solved by naming himself to the Senate seat.

As recently as December 4, in separate conversations with Advisor B and Fundraiser A, Blagojevich said that he was “elevating” Senate Candidate 5 on the list of candidates because, among other reasons, if Blagojevich ran for re-election, Senate Candidate 5 would “raise[] money” for him. Blagojevich said that he might be able to cut a deal with Senate Candidate 5 that provided Blagojevich with something “tangible up front.”

Noting that he was going to meet with Senate Candidate 5 in the next few days, Blagojevich told Fundraiser A to reach out to an intermediary (Individual D), from whom Blagojevich is attempting to obtain campaign contributions and who Blagojevich believes is close to Senate Candidate 5. Blagojevich told Fundraiser A to tell Individual D that Senate Candidate 5 was a very realistic candidate but Blagojevich was getting a lot of pressure not to appoint Senate Candidate 5, according to the affidavit.

Blagojevich allegedly told Fundraiser A to tell Individual D that if Senate Candidate 5 is going to be chosen,

“some of this stuff’s gotta start happening now . . . right now . . . and we gotta see it.”

Blagojevich continued,

“You gotta be careful how you express that and assume everybody’s listening, the whole world is listening. You hear me?”

Blagojevich further directed Fundraiser A to talk to Individual D in person, not by phone, and to communicate the “urgency” of the situation.

Blagojevich spoke to Fundraiser A again the next day, December 5, and discussed that day’s Chicago Tribune front page article stating that Blagojevich had recently been surreptitiously recorded as part of the ongoing criminal investigation. Blagojevich instructed Fundraiser A to “undo your [Individual D] thing,” and Fundraiser A confirmed it would be undone, the complaint alleges.

Also on December 5, Blagojevich and three others allegedly discussed whether to move money out of the Friends of Blagojevich campaign fund to avoid having the money frozen by federal authorities and also considered the possibility of prepaying the money to Blagojevich’s criminal defense attorney with an understanding that the attorney would donate the money back at a later time if it was not needed. They also discussed opening a new fund raising account named Citizens for Blagojevich with new contributions.

Misuse of State Funding To Induce Firing of Chicago Tribune Editorial Writers

According to the affidavit, intercepted phone calls revealed that the Tribune Company, which owns the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Cubs, has explored the possibility of obtaining assistance from the Illinois Finance Authority (IFA) relating to the Tribune Company’s efforts to sell the Cubs and the financing or sale of Wrigley Field.

In a November 6 phone call, Harris explained to Blagojevich that the deal the Tribune Company was trying to get through the IFA was basically a tax mitigation scheme in which the IFA would own title to Wrigley Field and the Tribune would not have to pay capital gains tax, which Harris estimated would save the company approximately $100 million.

Intercepted calls allegedly show that Blagojevich directed Harris to inform Tribune Owner and an associate, identified as Tribune Financial Advisor, that state financial assistance would be withheld unless members of the Chicago Tribune’s editorial board were fired, primarily because Blagojevich viewed them as driving discussion of his possible impeachment.

In a November 4 phone call, Blagojevich allegedly told Harris that he should say to Tribune Financial Advisor, Cubs Chairman and Tribune Owner,

“our recommendation is fire all those [expletive] people, get ‘em the [expletive] out of there and get us some editorial support.”

On November 6, the day of a Tribune editorial critical of Blagojevich , Harris told Blagojevich that he told Tribune Financial Advisor the previous day that things “look like they could move ahead fine but, you know, there is a risk that all of this is going to get derailed by your own editorial page.” Harris also told Blagojevich that he was meeting with Tribune Financial Advisor on November 10.

In a November 11 intercepted call, Harris allegedly told Blagojevich that Tribune Financial Advisor talked to Tribune Owner and Tribune Owner

“got the message and is very sensitive to the issue.”

Harris told Blagojevich that according to Tribune Financial Advisor, there would be

“certain corporate reorganizations and budget cuts coming and, reading between the lines, he’s going after that section.”

Blagojevich allegedly responded.

“Oh. That’s fantastic.”

After further discussion, Blagojevich said,

“Wow. Okay, keep our fingers crossed. You’re the man. Good job, John.”

In a further conversation on November 21, Harris told Blagojevich that he had singled out to Tribune Financial Advisor the Tribune’s deputy editorial page editor, John McCormick,

“as somebody who was the most biased and unfair.”

After hearing that Tribune Financial Advisor had assured Harris that the Tribune would be making changes affecting the editorial board, Blagojevich allegedly had a series of conversations with Chicago Cubs representatives regarding efforts to provide state financing for Wrigley Field.

On November 30, Blagojevich spoke with the president of a Chicago-area sports consulting firm, who indicated that he was working with the Cubs on matters involving Wrigley Field. Blagojevich and Sports Consultant discussed the importance of getting the IFA transaction approved at the agency’s December or January meeting because Blagojevich was contemplating leaving office in early January and his IFA appointees would still be in place to approve the deal, the charges allege.

The Government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Reid Schar, Carrie Hamilton and Christopher Niewoehner.

If convicted, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, while solicitation of bribery carries a maximum of 10 years in prison, and each count carries a maximum fine of $250,000. The Court, however, would determine the appropriate sentence to be imposed under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The public is reminded that a complaint contain only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

= = = = =
The campaign pieces are from 2006. The photo of Governor Rod Blagojevich being adored was in the Tribune on March 8, 2007. I guess it wasn’t enough to offset the later editorials calling for his removal.

Melissa Bean Criticized by Service Employees International Union

December 12, 2007 By: Cal Skinner Category: 8th Congressional District, Melissa Bean, SEIU, Service Employees International Union

A web site called Earthtimes.org has published what appears to be a press release from the Service Employees International Union critical of 8th district Congresswoman Melissa Bean.

The criticism is based on her being “one of only eight Democrats to vote against a bill – HR 3996, the Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007 – that would have protected millions of American working families from large tax increases next year, while taxing very wealthy private equity and hedge fund managers at a fairer rate.”

The press release follows:

As Congress Debates Tax Reform to Close Loop Holes for the Wealthiest;

Brave New Film’s ‘War on Greed’ to Be Screened Outside NY Fundraiser of Congresswoman Who Voted Against AMT Fix

NEW YORK, Dec. 10 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Brave New Films’ latest movie “War on Greed: Starring Henry Kravis,” which juxtaposes the lavish lifestyle of Private Equity tycoon Henry Kravis, with the lives of middle class Americans, will be screened outside of Illinois Congresswoman Melissa Bean’s New York fundraiser.

Rep. Bean opposes tax legislation that would have closed a loop hole that allows private equity tycoons like Kravis to pay a lower tax rate than many firemen, nurses and teachers.

On November 9, Rep. Bean was one of eight Democrats to vote against a bill – HR 3996, the Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007 – that would have protected millions of American working families from large tax increases next year, while taxing very wealthy private equity and hedge fund managers at a fairer rate.

Bean has banked hundreds of thousands of dollars from securities and investment companies in her campaign accounts over the last few elections, including the National Venture Capitalists Association – an outspoken critic of reforming the capital gains tax.[1]

In 2006, Bean also scored a poor 50 percent rating on SEIU’s congressional scorecard for support – or lack of support – for other legislation affecting the livelihood of America’s working families.

When: Tuesday, December 11 – 8:45 AM
Where: Outside Brasserie, 100 E 53rd Street – NewYork, NY
Who: Dozens of activists with video screens of film and flyers.

[1]
Service Employees International Union

Melissa Bean Criticized by Service Employees International Union

December 12, 2007 By: Cal Skinner Category: 8th Congressional District, Melissa Bean, SEIU, Service Employees International Union

A web site called Earthtimes.org has published what appears to be a press release from the Service Employees International Union critical of 8th district Congresswoman Melissa Bean.

The criticism is based on her being “one of only eight Democrats to vote against a bill – HR 3996, the Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007 – that would have protected millions of American working families from large tax increases next year, while taxing very wealthy private equity and hedge fund managers at a fairer rate.”

The press release follows:

As Congress Debates Tax Reform to Close Loop Holes for the Wealthiest;

Brave New Film’s ‘War on Greed’ to Be Screened Outside NY Fundraiser of Congresswoman Who Voted Against AMT Fix

NEW YORK, Dec. 10 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Brave New Films’ latest movie “War on Greed: Starring Henry Kravis,” which juxtaposes the lavish lifestyle of Private Equity tycoon Henry Kravis, with the lives of middle class Americans, will be screened outside of Illinois Congresswoman Melissa Bean’s New York fundraiser.

Rep. Bean opposes tax legislation that would have closed a loop hole that allows private equity tycoons like Kravis to pay a lower tax rate than many firemen, nurses and teachers.

On November 9, Rep. Bean was one of eight Democrats to vote against a bill – HR 3996, the Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007 – that would have protected millions of American working families from large tax increases next year, while taxing very wealthy private equity and hedge fund managers at a fairer rate.

Bean has banked hundreds of thousands of dollars from securities and investment companies in her campaign accounts over the last few elections, including the National Venture Capitalists Association – an outspoken critic of reforming the capital gains tax.[1]

In 2006, Bean also scored a poor 50 percent rating on SEIU’s congressional scorecard for support – or lack of support – for other legislation affecting the livelihood of America’s working families.

When: Tuesday, December 11 – 8:45 AM
Where: Outside Brasserie, 100 E 53rd Street – NewYork, NY
Who: Dozens of activists with video screens of film and flyers.

[1]
Service Employees International Union