McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Strike’

District 300 Board and Teachers’ Union Ratify New Three-Year Contract

December 20, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Contract, District 300, IEA, Illinois Education Association, LEAD300, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Dues, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

District 300 teachers show the public that they are striking by carrying picket signs on Randall Road.

District 300 teachers show the public that they are striking by carrying picket signs on Randall Road.

Below is a press release from District 300 about the ratification of the contract that came about after a one-day teachers strike.

If you would like to read highlights I picked out of the over 100-page contract, including salary information in dollar amounts amounts,  you can do so here.

If you would like to delve deeper into the 40,000+ word contract, you can find it here.

Board and Teachers’ Union Approve 3‐Year Contract

The Community Unit School District 300 Board of Education (Board) and Local Education Association District 300 (LEAD 300) have approved a 3‐year contract for the time period from July 1, 2012, to June 30, 2015.

The membership of LEAD 300 ratified the contract yesterday (Dec. 19), and the Board voted to approve the contract this evening (Dec. 20).

Contract negotiations focused on several issues that will positively impact the students’ learning environment by lowering class sizes and improving teachers’ working conditions.

The Board and LEAD 300 mutually understand best practices regarding class size and the direct impact these practices have on education.

The Board agrees to make class size a priority and make every effort to keep class sizes at a reasonable number.

To that extent, the Board and LEAD 300 have agreed to form a joint class size committee to monitor class sizes across the district.

Beginning with the 2013‐2014 school year, class sizes will generally be as follows:
D300 classroom limits 11-7-12
The agreement includes a modification of the high school day from eight, 45‐minute periods plus a 30‐minute
lunch, to nine, 45‐minute periods, one of which is a lunch period.

This alteration allows for consistency in both teacher and student schedules, and also makes it possible for students to have greater flexibility in course selection.

Administration and LEAD 300 will create several committees whose representative membership will work
toward creating a collaborative structure for addressing the ongoing needs of District 300 staff and students. The focus of these committees will include:

  • A Class Size Committee that will monitor class size and continue to explore options to reduce class sizes in order to create academically sound environments within budgetary and facility constraints
  • Collaborative Councils for each instructional level and education services that will help maintain open communication and explore solutions to ongoing issues
  • An Insurance Committee that will monitor District‐wide insurance plans and costs in order to ensure fiscal responsibility while maintaining appropriate levels of employee benefits
  • A Performance Evaluation Reform Act [PERA] Committee that will create and monitor the procedures for evaluations of certified staff to ensure quality educators for all students in the District
  • A joint committee that will help create a more collegial, supportive workplace environment, free from harassment and bullying through policy and procedural changes

The average salary increase for the 3‐year contract will be as follows:

  • 2012‐2013: Step plus 1%
  • 2013‐2014: Step only
  • 2014‐2015: Step plus 1%

“Step” refers to movement on the existing salary schedule and varies depending on employees’ years of service and education, but on average it equals 2%.

Beginning with the 2013‐2014 school year, LEAD 300 retirement benefits will decrease from a 6% adjustment for each of the last four years of service to 3%. The benefit will sunset as of 2015.

Once formatting has been completed for printing purposes, the full contract is anticipated to be available on the Human Resources page of the district website, www.d300.org, by mid‐January 2013.

The instructional day missed on Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, due to the strike will be made up at the end of the school year.

This means that unless any emergency/snow days are used this school year, the last day of school will be Wednesday, May 22, 2013.

District 300 Strike Ended after One Day

December 04, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: District 300, Joe Stevens, Strike, Teacher Contract, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

Striking District 300 teachers walked on the side of Randall Road near the Jacobs High School sign.

A robo-call from District 300 Board member Joe Stevens tonight announced the settlement of the LEAD300 teachers union strike:

“Good evening. This is Joe Stevens, member of the District 300 Board of Education and District spokesperson regarding the ongoing negotiations between the Teachers Union, LEAD 300, and the Board of Education.

“Board of Education and LEAD 300 negotiation teams met today to try to find a resolution.

“On behalf of LEAD and the Board, I am pleased to report that we officially reached a tentative agreement this evening with LEAD for a new 3-year contract.

“The strike has ended, and schools will be in session tomorrow, Wednesday, December 5th.

“It was through the combined efforts of LEAD’s leadership team and the Board’s leadership team that we are able to end the strike.

“Both LEAD and the Board deeply appreciate the amount of public input we have received on these incredibly important issues.

“Your support for our efforts and for the learning environment was impressive.

“It is clear that we all share a mutual concern for our students’ success.

“As is customary in these types of situations, no details of our tentative agreement will be released by either party until the agreement is ratified by the LEAD membership and accepted by the Board of Education which is anticipated to take place no sooner than December 18th.

“Thank you.”

= = = = =
Such a shame the taxpayer pubic is not able to see the contract before those who negotiated in secret vote to approve it.

District 300 Picket Sign Suggestions

December 04, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: District 300, Joe Stevens, Picket, Sign, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

A comment from a previous article included these emailed suggestions for picket signs:

Hi all:

Teachers on Randall Road near Jacobs High School seemed to have no custom-made signs.

Make signs at warming center on your breaks1. Students First, NOT ADM
2. $ 6 million WASTED on ADM per year
3. Teacher concessions $3.4 million per year
4. Dr. Bregy is a Quack
5. Bregy mismanages D300 $
6. Stevens/Bregy are the problem
7. Less teachers, less coaches, less clubs WHY?
8. Teachers = Strong Students
9. ADM NOT the answer, teachers are the SOLUTION

11. Fire Bregy
12. Teachers for students
13. Support students, NOT ADM
14. Don’t trust Stevens, an insurance salesman
15. Support classroom environment, NOT ADM
16. We are schools, not a corporation
17. ADM does not teach students
18. 29 more ADM, 30 less teachers WHAT?

20. More layers of mangement, WRONG
21. VOTE STEVENS OUT

Greg Fogarty

= = = = =

School Board Recruitment Ad

Note that suggestions 10 and 19 are missing. Are you as curious as I am as to what they were?

You will also note the evidence that the teachers union will be involved in next spring’s school board elections. Not that they have not been before…and not just in District 300.

The problem is that those representing the taxpayer side of the equation don’t have a large enough personal financial interest to run for school board.

But, just in case someone is interested in taking on the challenge, here is the link from the recruitment ad that is running on McHenry County Blog.

District 300 Issues Summary of School Strike from Its Point of View

December 03, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: District 300, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

And, here it is:

“The District 300 Board of Education and LEAD 300 negotiation teams met from 8 a.m. to approximately 4:45 p.m. today (Monday, Dec. 3), with the assistance of a federal mediator, to discuss outstanding contractual issues. The Board agreed to LEAD’s latest proposal this morning to further reduce class sizes at all grade levels and create class size caps for middle and high school classes.   The LEAD team then increased its salary proposal by returning to an earlier salary request.

“The Board’s proposal equates to $15 million over current spending levels for the life of the 3-year contract.  This includes salaries, benefits, class size reductions, and other collective bargaining matters.  The Board agreed with LEAD’s proposal from this morning regarding class sizes, staff recall rights, bullying policy, and the number of students in lab-based classrooms.

“The Board agreed to LEAD’s proposal from this morning on class sizes and committed to hiring approximately 60 teachers.  There is no agreement on salaries.   The Board’s latest offer will require the District to deficit spend for the next three years.  The Board has agreed to this proposal without knowing the financial impact of potential pension reform and future state funding levels.

“Despite today’s progress in negotiations, LEAD has advised the Board that they will be going on strike tomorrow, Tuesday, December 4.  District 300 schools will be closed tomorrow, and all school-sponsored events and activities are cancelled. The district will enact its Emergency Attendance Center plan tomorrow for students whose parents registered them in advance to participate.”

The Board’s latest offer included:

SALARY SCHEDULE

  • 2012-2013: 3% salary increase (including step)
  • 2013-2014: 2% salary increase (including step)
  • 2014-2015: 3% salary increase (including step)

CLASS SIZE / WORKING CONDITIONS

The Board agreed with LEAD’s proposal from this morning (Dec. 3) to reduce class sizes at all grade levels, and also to establish class caps for the first time at the middle and high school levels to improve teaching conditions.  This would require the District to hire approximately 60 teachers, as follows:

  • At the elementary level, add approximately 40 teachers over the next two years:
    • The maximum number of students per class (K-2) will be 27 students in 2013-2014 and 26 students beginning in 2014-2015.
    • The maximum number of students per class (3-5) will be 30 students in 2013-2014 and 29 students beginning in 2014-2015.
  • At the middle school level, add 10 teachers in 2013-2014:
    • Cap the number of students per class, excluding PE and music, at 32 students in 2013-2014 and 31 students beginning in 2014-2015. (Currently there are no caps for middle school class sizes.)
    • The additional 10 teachers would help to reduce class sizes.
  • At the high school level, add 10 teachers in 2013-2014:
    • Cap the number of students per class, excluding PE and music, at 32 students in 2013-2014 and 31 students beginning in 2014-2015. (Currently there are no caps for high school class sizes.)
    • The 10 additional teachers will be utilized to create a new nine-period schedule, which will not change student course loads but will improve teacher working conditions.  Teachers (except PE and music) will now teach five classes daily plus one period of supervision.

RETIREMENT

The Board modified its Nov. 29 retirement incentive proposal.  The retirement incentive would  expire at the end of this 3-year contract, as follows:

  • 2012-2013:  6% increase over Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) creditable earnings for each of the four years prior to retirement
  • 2013-2014:  3% increase over TRS creditable earnings for each of the four years prior to retirement
  • 2014-2015:  3% increase over TRS creditable earnings for each of the four years prior to retirement

INSURANCE

There would be no change to overall insurance benefits, with the exception that if the annual increase to insurance costs is projected to exceed 14% then the D300 Insurance Committee (which includes LEAD members) will meet to determine changes in the insurance design plan.

If the committee does not agree on design changes, the Board and employees enrolled in the plan will split 50/50 any increase over 14%.

NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION

The Board maintained its Nov. 29 proposal regarding additional compensation to teachers in possession of National Board Certification, as follows. For teachers currently holding National Board Certification, the Board proposed phasing out the extra pay of 7% of their annual salary.

Currently, teachers who earn National Board Certification receive a 7% increase to their annual salary.  The new contract would phase out this benefit for current certificate holders, as follows:

  • 2012-2013: extra pay of 6% of annual salary
  • 2013-2014: extra pay of 5% of annual salary
  • 2014-2015: extra pay of 2.5% of annual salary
  • Teachers who achieve National Board Certification after March 1, 2013, will receive an annual stipend of $1,200.
  • Any teacher who decides by March 1, 2013, not to continue pursuing this certification would be reimbursed for personal certification-related expenses up to $3,000.

District 300 Teachers Striking

December 03, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: District 300, Joe Stevens, LEAD300, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Pay, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Union

If District 300 teachers decide to gather for a meeting outside of some school as these Huntley District 158 ones did in 2008, at least it won’t be in the biting cold.

Here’s the message from the teachers’ union’s bargaining committee:

“LEAD 300 Members,

“As of 3:15 pm this afternoon, LEAD 300 and the Board’s team have not been able to come to a suitable compromise on both Class Size and Compensation issues. The Board’s team is also unwilling to entertain any alternatives or creative methods to compensate members for overload and/or salary.

“95% of the members at our meeting told us that they would not accept the Board’s proposal as presented. And unfortunately we have not made enough movement from that proposal. At this point, their attorney has left for the evening and is not able to come back until 8:00pm. She has made it clear that even if she does return, we should not expect to see any more movement this evening.

“We must, therefore, take the next step in this incredibly difficult process. As of tomorrow morning, LEAD 300 members are on Strike.

“Members will be contacted by their building strike captains with further instructions.

“Together, in unity, we must take this ultimate step. We must finish this contract negotiation.

“The LEAD 300 Bargaining Team”

You can read a good part of the Administration’s “Final Offer” here.

Here is District 300′s response:

Schools closed Tuesday, Dec. 4; Teachers Union will strike

The following voice mail message was sent by the Board of Education to District 300 parents and staff members at 5:25 p.m. this evening (Monday, Dec. 3, 2012):

Joe Stevens

“Hello, this is Joe Stevens, member of the District 300 Board of Education and District spokesperson regarding the ongoing negotiations between the Teachers Union, LEAD 300, and the Board of Education.

“Board of Education and LEAD 300 negotiation teams have been meeting since 8 a.m. this morning with the assistance of a federal mediator to discuss outstanding contractual issues.

“After the Board agreed to LEAD’s latest proposal to further reduce class sizes at all grade levels and create class size caps for middle and high school classes, the LEAD team increased its salary proposal by returning to an earlier salary request.

“At this point, the Board has met LEAD’s expectations regarding class sizes, but we have not reached agreement on salaries.

“The LEAD team has advised the Board that they will be going on strike tomorrow, Tuesday, December 4.

“D300 schools will be closed tomorrow, and all school-sponsored events and activities are cancelled.

“The district will enact its plan tomorrow for Emergency Attendance Centers for students who registered in advance to participate. For more information about today’s collective bargaining efforts, please visit d300.org later this evening.”

Dist 300 Board Talks about the Teachers’ Strike Vote

October 15, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Distrrict 300, LEAD300, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Pay, Teacher Strike

A press release from Carpentersville Unit District 300:

Teacher Union Negotiations Update

Negotiations between the Community Unit School District 300 Board of Education and the District 300 teachers’ union are scheduled for tomorrow, Tuesday, Oct. 16, and we are hopeful that we will continue to make progress toward resolution.

Things were normal at Lake in the Hills Elementary School this morning.

Listed below are questions that our school community may have regarding a potential teachers’ strike:

What is a strike vote?

When a teachers’ union conducts a strike vote, or ratifies a resolution to authorize a strike, this does not necessarily mean that there will be a teachers strike within the district. A strike authorization vote gives the union’s negotiating team the right to declare a strike if they deem it necessary.

A teachers’ strike can only occur after impasse has been declared, and this has not yet occurred in District 300. We remain optimistic that we will not be forced to implement contingency strike plans that cause disruption not only to the educational process, but to the lives of District 300 families and community members.

How does a strike occur?

After proclaiming negotiations unsuccessful, a teachers’ union may declare impasse. After this, the union notifies the Board of Education and then files a motion with the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board [IELRB].

The teachers’ union and the Board of Education then have seven calendar days to submit their last, best offers and the detailed costs associated with proposals to the IELRB. After that, the IELRB has another seven calendar days to review and post these proposals on its web site.

By law, any Illinois teachers’ union must wait a minimum of fourteen days after the final offers have been made public through the IELRB web site before engaging in a strike. In summary, the earliest a teachers’ union strike could occur is twenty-eight calendar days after impasse has been declared.

District officials will make every effort to keep the D300 community informed via web site postings as information becomes available.

Huntley Teachers Vote to Strike

October 10, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Huntley Education Association, Huntley School District 158, Strike

Teachers carrying picket signs on Haligus Road during the last strike in the Huntley School District.

Various news sources are reporting the Huntley Education Association has passed a strike vote.

Huntley makes the third McHenry County school district where teachers felt the need to take the most extreme measure allowed by law.

The other two:

  • Prairie Grove Elementary District, which stuck for one day last Friday.
  • Carpentersville District 300, which covers most of Algonquin and Lake in the Hills.

District 300 Teachers’ Union Aims for October 19th

September 26, 2012 By: Cal Skinner Category: Carpentersville, District 300, LEAD300, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Union

The last teachers’ strike in the area was by the Huntley Teachers Association in 2008.

Strike votes are being taken at various schools in Carpentersville Unit School District 300.

Teachers who wish to go on strike seem to be winning.

In preparation, leadership is pointing to Friday, October 19th, as the day the picket lines will go up.

It seems likely that it is not a coincidence that Friday, October 19th is the end of a pay period, the day that pay checks are due.

Cary Grade School Board Imposes “Last Best” Offer Terms on School Teachers, Strike a Possibility

August 15, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School Board, Cary Grade School District, Strike, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike

A press release from Cary Elementary School District 26:

Board Imposes Last Best Offer for the Start of School

The Cary District 26 School Board regrets to announce that it has been unable to reach a negotiated agreement with the Cary Education Association (CEA) and will impose its last best contract offer at the start of the school year.

This will mean teachers will start the new school year working under the terms of the school board’s last-best contract offer.

Will Cary Grade School District 26 soon follow the example of these Huntley High School teachers?

While the CEA has repeatedly said they has no intention of striking, this is still a possibility.

By law, before striking the CEA must provide ten day’s written notice to the District.

The Board will work diligently to ensure school starts on time this year. Classes are expected to start on time on August 24.

The Board will keep the community posted on any developments.

In a skillful YouTube production, someone calling himself Drew Madigan takes on District 26 School Board member Chris Jenner in particular and the Cary School Board in general, accusing the Board of refusing to negotiate.

The Board and CEA have been in negotiations for six months for a successor labor agreement to the 2008-11 labor contract with is set to expire on August 23, 2011, the day before school starts.

After seventeen negotiating sessions—six with a federal mediator—and 8 formal offers, the Board declared an impasse on June 22m 2011.

The main unresolved issues are salary, retirement, insurance benefits and the length of the teachers’ work day.

As most people in the community know, because of a dramatic and severe financial crisis, in addition to the other cost saving measures that don’t directly affect students, in the spring of 2010, the Board was compelled to lay off 75 teachers, comprising one-third of the staff 2010-11 school year.

That move drastically increased class sizes and severely cuts special programs such as art and music.

The Board also closed a school that year and reduced administrative staff to further cut costs.

At that time the Board asked the CEA to open the teacher contract to re-negotiate salary and benefits to save teachers’ jobs and to keep class sizes at a more manageable level.

The CEA refused to consider reducing pay or to consider putting off scheduled pay raises and the Board had no choice to lay off a third of the staff.

Faced with uncertain staffing costs due to the unresolved CEA contract for the 2011/11 school year, the Board closed yet another school and made yet more administrative and teacher staffing reductions.

In these negotiations, the Board proposed a new compensation to maintain an adequate level of educational programs while balancing its budget.

From 2002 through 2010 the District consistently ran budget deficits which totally depleted it fund balances and maxed out its short-term borrowing capacity.

On the day before the Cary Grade School Board announced that it would impose its last best offer on teachers, Drew Madigan again attacks Board member Chris Jenner in a Youtube post. He apologizes to other board members for anyone who may have thought they were Tea Party members. Since it would take four board members to impose the last best offer, one might wonder if Jenner's views have become mainstream.

During this time, increases in teacher pay far exceeded that of all other employee groups, and now significantly exceeds neighboring elementary districts of comparable size, even after factoring in education and experience.

A recent study put their pay in the 94th percentile in Illinois.

While beginning salaries are are comparable to surrounding districts, salary schedule steps (built-in annual increases) are generally much larger, resulting in higher salaries for the same educational credentials for more experienced teachers.

Cary’s teachers average 15 years experience.

While the community has done its part by passing a $15 million referendum to eliminate the short-term borrowing and avoid a state takeover, the Board has focused its efforts on cost cutting.

In the last two years, it has cut costs by almost 1/3 by closing two schools, laying off administrators, teachers and support personnel, cutting special programs such as art and music, outsourcing its janitorial services, and other measures.

Having raised class sizes as high as they can reasonably go and trimming programs to the essentials, it is clear that the teachers’ salaries and benefit structure must change,

This is especially true given the decreasing state funding.

With this in mind, the Board’s last offer is for two years, and calls for:

  • Salary: There is an overall salary decrease of 1.7%. This does not mean all teachers will receive a 1.7% pay cut next year. Because a very rich retirement program was in the 2008-2010 contract, eligible teachers who have worked for the district for as few as 15 years will get 6% increases in their salaries for the last four years before retirement. This benefit is grandfathered in under the terms of the 2008-11 contract. As a result 52 teachers, a full third of the teaching staff  [emphasis in the original]– will get 6% salary increases next year. Because these built-in retiree pay raises eat up so much money, the remaining staff would take pay cuts of 7.5% under the Board’s proposal.
  • Retirement: Under the 2008-11 contract, eligible teachers not only receive up to four consecutive years of 6% increases in salary, they also receive $20,000 immediately after they retire and the Board is obligated to pay $10 for each day of sick leave the teacher had not used up. These benefits are expected to cot the District approximately $1.2 million over the next four years. The District has proposed eliminating these benefits for future retirees since they are exceedingly expensive for a District in as poor financial condition as is ours.
  • Insurance: Under the 2008-11 contract, the Board paid 100% of the premium for single health and dental coverages for teachers and between 20% and 50% of premiums for family health and dental coverage that is in excess of of the cost of the single benefit. Each teacher also receives $50,000 in life insurance and long-term disability coverage. This benefit program has proven to be extremely costly. To help balance its budget, the District Iis offering in 2011-12 to contribute up to $7,000 toward whatever coverage the teacher elects, and in the 2012-13 school year up to $3,000 toward whatever coverage the teacher elects.
  • Teachers’ Share of Pension Contributions: Teachers are obligated by law to pay 9.4% of their current salary to the Teachers Retirement System. In the past, the Board has agreed to pay 4.7% , or about half of that obligation. The Board also has its own TRS obligation for each teacher. Since the pension payment is essentially an obligation of the teacher stemming from the need to fund his or her own retirement, the Board is proposed to have each teacher pay this 4.7% beginning 2011-12.
  • Length of School Day: The School Board has proposed that the work day increase from 7 to 7½ hours in order to restore student learning time to six hours. Last year student learning time was decreased to the state minimum of five hours to keep the overall teacher workday with the limits of the teacher contract then in place.

he Cary District 26 School Board sincerely appreciates the support it has received from the community, and will work diligently to keep the schools open.

The Board will also do everything it can to maintain the quality of education while living within its means.

The state of Illinois is still monitoring the District to insure we don’t slip back into a pattern of deficit spending.

We agree that balanced budgets must be maintained not only for prudent financial management, but also to help restore District programs and infrastructure once we transition through the last few years of an unsustainable cost structure.

Anyone who questions or concerns is encouraged to attend anyone of the Board’s meetings, though committee meetings are more informal in structure allowing more interaction with community members.

The meeting schedule as well as a more detailed explanation og the Board’s offer, can be referenced from the District’s web site.
= = = = =

The school board will meet tonight at 6 at Cary Middle School.

Why Cutting and Pasting Doesn’t Always Work

May 18, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Education, Education Reform, McHenry County Repubican Central Committee, McHenry County Republicans, Memorial, Mike Tryon, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Strike

Yesterday, I took from the McHenry County Republican web site something State Rep. Mike Tryon had put up about educational reform.

It contained “Talking Points for Educational Reform.”

Undoubtedly handed out to all Republican members of the Illinois House.

The new educational reform bill does nothing to deter strikes by teachers outside of Chicago. This is a picture of Huntley teachers meeting durring their strike.

One point, however, does not apply outside of Chicago:

“Averting teacher strikes is another key component of these reforms.”

There is a requirement for an extraordinary majority to authorize a strike in Chicago, but not impediment elsewhere in Illinois can be found in the bill.

Oops.