McHenry County Blog

Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Teacher Layoffs’

Cary School District 26 Contract Press Release

November 02, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School, Cary Grade School Board, Cary Grade School District, Contract, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

Here’s the press release about the teachers’ contract which the Cary School Board ratified last night:

Cary Junior High and elementary school students will get a shorted school day after Thanksgiving.

District 26 Board Ratifies Teacher Contract
November 1, 2011

The Board of Education of Cary Community Consolidated School District 26 announced today that they have ratified a tentative agreement with the Cary Education Association (CEA) addressing all issues related to a new collective bargaining agreement.

The new three-year agreement calls for:

  • Reduction in teacher compensation by 3% in the 2011-2012 school year and a pay freeze in the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 school years.  Teachers will be permitted to change lanes and “move horizontally” on the salary schedule by taking additional course work during the contract but will not receive automatic “step” or longevity increases.
  • A change in the employee insurance program. Previously, the Board paid 100% of single coverage and between 20% and 50% of family coverage depending on a teacher’s years of service in the district. Under the new agreement, the Board will pay 50% of single coverage, and between 10% and 40% of family coverage depending upon a teacher’s experience in the district.
  • The school day for students has been lengthened from 5 hours and 45 minutes last year to 6 hours and 15 minutes under this new agreement. Student instructional time will be increased by 30 minutes a day over last year’s amounts. The parties expect to transition to a new daily schedule corresponding to the change in the school day after the Thanksgiving holiday.
  • The tuition reimbursement program under the previous collective bargaining agreement has been eliminated from the new contract.
  • The retirement program under previous contract has been eliminated. Under previous agreements, eligible employees could receive up to four years of 6% increases in their last years of employment; up to $20,000 in lump sum payments following retirement; and up to $10 a day for unused sick leave.

At the start of this school year the Board had imposed contract terms for the 2011-2012 school year which provided for reductions in pay and in the insurance program greater than those agreed to as outlined above.

Through a series of meetings with a federal mediator after the start of the school year, however, the parties were able to reach agreement on all economic and language issues for a three-year contract.

The parties expect to finalize the contract language and execute an agreement as soon as possible.

Chris Spoerl, the Board President, said,

“These negotiations have taken a long time to complete — since November 2010 in fact – in large measure because of the very serious financial challenges faced by the district. These were not easy labor talks but the board is confident that the new agreement will help put the district on a more stable financial ground for the next three years.”

Cary Grade School Teacher Contract Settlement Reached, But Details Kept Secret

October 27, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School, Cary Grade School Board, Cary Grade School District, Castor Bean, District 26, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teachers Union, Union

The Cary School District's Administrative Office.

A press release from Cary Elementary School District 26:

Board and CEA Reach Tentative Agreement on All Issues

The Board of Education of Cary Community Consolidated School District 26 and the Cary Education Association, which represents the teachers in labor negotiations, announced today that on Wednesday evening they reached a
tentative agreement on all outstanding issues.

The parties have been in negotiations since November in an effort to reach agreement on a new contract.

The previous collective bargaining agreement expired at the start of the 2011‐2012 school years.

The terms of the contract will be presented to the teachers for ratification next week and the Board of Education soon after. Details of the agreement will be released after ratification.

= = = = =

Unlike McHenry County College, which released a summary of the contract its board will approve tonight, local school boards, such as Cary’s, won’t let taxpayers know how the bulk of their taxes will be spent.  Typically, 80% of a school district’s operating expenditures go for salaries.  Some, of course, are for non-teachers, but faculty salaries make up most of that 80%.

I cannot understand why this does not disturb more people.

What’s Being Released to the Public about Cary Grade School Teachers’ Contract

September 01, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School, Cary Grade School Board, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

Here’s what’s on the web site:

The signed copy of the press release.

Joint Press Release Cary BOE and CEA
posted 5 hours ago by Caryil d26

The Board of Education of Cary Community Consolidated School District 26 and The Cary Education Association which represents the teachers announced tonight that they have reached a tentative agreement to resolve the significant financial issues between the parties and are optimistic that they can reach full agreement on all remaining issues.

The parties are set to meet next week in an effort to reach an agreement on all remaining issues.

The details of the tentative agreement will be made after the board of education and association members have ratified it.

= = = = =

Again, I would point out that taxpayers should be able to read proposed contracts before they are ratified by thr elected representatives.  In my memory only Huntley School District 158 did so and that was for the contract before last.  That was when Larry Snow was on the school board.

District 26 School Board and Teachers Union Meeting Tonight

August 31, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School, Cary Grade School Board, Cary Grade School District, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Retirement System, Teachers Union

Marshall Lowe put political messates on his sign on Route 14. Last week's was in support of the Distrit 26 School Board.

The teachers in Cary Grade Schools are teaching.

They could be striking as the School Board imposed a contract on them.

But, they’re not striking.

They want to talk more.

The meeting is at the Cary Junior High.

= = = = =
The message on Marshall Lowe’s sign says,

DIST 26 BOARD

FOR SOME ITS A HARD

PILL TO SWALLOW BUT

STAY THE COURSE

Cary Grade School Board Imposes “Last Best” Offer Terms on School Teachers, Strike a Possibility

August 15, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Elementary School District 26, Cary Grade School Board, Cary Grade School District, Strike, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike

A press release from Cary Elementary School District 26:

Board Imposes Last Best Offer for the Start of School

The Cary District 26 School Board regrets to announce that it has been unable to reach a negotiated agreement with the Cary Education Association (CEA) and will impose its last best contract offer at the start of the school year.

This will mean teachers will start the new school year working under the terms of the school board’s last-best contract offer.

Will Cary Grade School District 26 soon follow the example of these Huntley High School teachers?

While the CEA has repeatedly said they has no intention of striking, this is still a possibility.

By law, before striking the CEA must provide ten day’s written notice to the District.

The Board will work diligently to ensure school starts on time this year. Classes are expected to start on time on August 24.

The Board will keep the community posted on any developments.

In a skillful YouTube production, someone calling himself Drew Madigan takes on District 26 School Board member Chris Jenner in particular and the Cary School Board in general, accusing the Board of refusing to negotiate.

The Board and CEA have been in negotiations for six months for a successor labor agreement to the 2008-11 labor contract with is set to expire on August 23, 2011, the day before school starts.

After seventeen negotiating sessions—six with a federal mediator—and 8 formal offers, the Board declared an impasse on June 22m 2011.

The main unresolved issues are salary, retirement, insurance benefits and the length of the teachers’ work day.

As most people in the community know, because of a dramatic and severe financial crisis, in addition to the other cost saving measures that don’t directly affect students, in the spring of 2010, the Board was compelled to lay off 75 teachers, comprising one-third of the staff 2010-11 school year.

That move drastically increased class sizes and severely cuts special programs such as art and music.

The Board also closed a school that year and reduced administrative staff to further cut costs.

At that time the Board asked the CEA to open the teacher contract to re-negotiate salary and benefits to save teachers’ jobs and to keep class sizes at a more manageable level.

The CEA refused to consider reducing pay or to consider putting off scheduled pay raises and the Board had no choice to lay off a third of the staff.

Faced with uncertain staffing costs due to the unresolved CEA contract for the 2011/11 school year, the Board closed yet another school and made yet more administrative and teacher staffing reductions.

In these negotiations, the Board proposed a new compensation to maintain an adequate level of educational programs while balancing its budget.

From 2002 through 2010 the District consistently ran budget deficits which totally depleted it fund balances and maxed out its short-term borrowing capacity.

On the day before the Cary Grade School Board announced that it would impose its last best offer on teachers, Drew Madigan again attacks Board member Chris Jenner in a Youtube post. He apologizes to other board members for anyone who may have thought they were Tea Party members. Since it would take four board members to impose the last best offer, one might wonder if Jenner's views have become mainstream.

During this time, increases in teacher pay far exceeded that of all other employee groups, and now significantly exceeds neighboring elementary districts of comparable size, even after factoring in education and experience.

A recent study put their pay in the 94th percentile in Illinois.

While beginning salaries are are comparable to surrounding districts, salary schedule steps (built-in annual increases) are generally much larger, resulting in higher salaries for the same educational credentials for more experienced teachers.

Cary’s teachers average 15 years experience.

While the community has done its part by passing a $15 million referendum to eliminate the short-term borrowing and avoid a state takeover, the Board has focused its efforts on cost cutting.

In the last two years, it has cut costs by almost 1/3 by closing two schools, laying off administrators, teachers and support personnel, cutting special programs such as art and music, outsourcing its janitorial services, and other measures.

Having raised class sizes as high as they can reasonably go and trimming programs to the essentials, it is clear that the teachers’ salaries and benefit structure must change,

This is especially true given the decreasing state funding.

With this in mind, the Board’s last offer is for two years, and calls for:

  • Salary: There is an overall salary decrease of 1.7%. This does not mean all teachers will receive a 1.7% pay cut next year. Because a very rich retirement program was in the 2008-2010 contract, eligible teachers who have worked for the district for as few as 15 years will get 6% increases in their salaries for the last four years before retirement. This benefit is grandfathered in under the terms of the 2008-11 contract. As a result 52 teachers, a full third of the teaching staff  [emphasis in the original]– will get 6% salary increases next year. Because these built-in retiree pay raises eat up so much money, the remaining staff would take pay cuts of 7.5% under the Board’s proposal.
  • Retirement: Under the 2008-11 contract, eligible teachers not only receive up to four consecutive years of 6% increases in salary, they also receive $20,000 immediately after they retire and the Board is obligated to pay $10 for each day of sick leave the teacher had not used up. These benefits are expected to cot the District approximately $1.2 million over the next four years. The District has proposed eliminating these benefits for future retirees since they are exceedingly expensive for a District in as poor financial condition as is ours.
  • Insurance: Under the 2008-11 contract, the Board paid 100% of the premium for single health and dental coverages for teachers and between 20% and 50% of premiums for family health and dental coverage that is in excess of of the cost of the single benefit. Each teacher also receives $50,000 in life insurance and long-term disability coverage. This benefit program has proven to be extremely costly. To help balance its budget, the District Iis offering in 2011-12 to contribute up to $7,000 toward whatever coverage the teacher elects, and in the 2012-13 school year up to $3,000 toward whatever coverage the teacher elects.
  • Teachers’ Share of Pension Contributions: Teachers are obligated by law to pay 9.4% of their current salary to the Teachers Retirement System. In the past, the Board has agreed to pay 4.7% , or about half of that obligation. The Board also has its own TRS obligation for each teacher. Since the pension payment is essentially an obligation of the teacher stemming from the need to fund his or her own retirement, the Board is proposed to have each teacher pay this 4.7% beginning 2011-12.
  • Length of School Day: The School Board has proposed that the work day increase from 7 to 7½ hours in order to restore student learning time to six hours. Last year student learning time was decreased to the state minimum of five hours to keep the overall teacher workday with the limits of the teacher contract then in place.

he Cary District 26 School Board sincerely appreciates the support it has received from the community, and will work diligently to keep the schools open.

The Board will also do everything it can to maintain the quality of education while living within its means.

The state of Illinois is still monitoring the District to insure we don’t slip back into a pattern of deficit spending.

We agree that balanced budgets must be maintained not only for prudent financial management, but also to help restore District programs and infrastructure once we transition through the last few years of an unsustainable cost structure.

Anyone who questions or concerns is encouraged to attend anyone of the Board’s meetings, though committee meetings are more informal in structure allowing more interaction with community members.

The meeting schedule as well as a more detailed explanation og the Board’s offer, can be referenced from the District’s web site.
= = = = =

The school board will meet tonight at 6 at Cary Middle School.

District 300 Contract Still Hidden Almost 7 Weeks after Passage

July 22, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: District 300, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teachers Union, Transparency, Union

I was disappointed, but not surprised, when District 300 did not reveal the details of its teachers’ contract prior to its early June public vote.

The 2008 Huntley School Board allowed taxpayers to read the document before it was approved.

I figured the teachers’ contract approved at an official open meeting of the District 300 Board of Education would be posted immediately after the meeting. It wasn’t.

Details
were released, but not the document that was voted upon.

Just a summary.

I had been told that District 300′s teacher contract would be made available by July 15th.

When that date came and went, I emailed asking where the contract was.

Communications Director Allison Strupeck replied yesterday,

“We had anticipated the document would be completed by mid-July.

“There are numerous parties involved in finalizing all of the wording and details.

“We have a legal obligation to ensure that all parties have been able to thoroughly vet the document before it is finalized and published.

“A very conservative estimate of the remaining steps in this process would be another couple of months.”

Undoubtedly those who are teachers in this school board budget meeting audience from 2006 know what is being changed in the contract after agreement was reportedly reached.

The taxpayers in this shot of the interested public and District 300 employees are being kept in the dark about the details in the teachers' contract approved the first week of June.

Taxpayers do not.

Cary Grade School Union Starts Web Site, Reveals Negotiation Stances & More

June 12, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Cary, Cary Education Association, Cary Grade School, Cary Grade School Board, Cary Grade School District, Contract, McHenry County, Negotiations, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Pension, Teacher Salaries, Teachers Union

Even since the Huntley School Board decided to share teacher negotiation details with taxpayer-voters on its web site, I have been watching for some other district to follow suit.

Carpentersville District 300, which approved a contract without publishing its contents, just a summary,    More details were provided by Board member Joe Stevens.

But no contract.  The lawyers are working out details.  Check back after June 15th.

Will there be major changes between the board and union approval votes and the final version?

No way anyone outside the process will ever know.

So, imagine my surprise when the Cary Education Association decided to put up a web site and included negotiations’ details…at least from the teachers’ point of view.

Nothing wrong with that.

If the School Board would do something similar, the public might even be able to figure out what’s going on.

 

The top of the page on negotiations.

In a front page letter to parents and taxpayers, the teachers ask,

“While our stance has always been to remain within the guidelines of negotiations, we can no longer remain silent.

“The simple fact is that teachers’ working conditions are students’ learning conditions. How can our students achieve maximum success when the current environment is not conducive to learning? “

There’s more, of course.

The IEA local union points out that the state gives the school district “ten years” to dig out from under the financial problems.

Apparently stung by the impression that the high average salary paid to Cary Grade School Teachers, the web site extracts beginning salaries for those with bachelor’s and master’s degrees among McHenry County school districts. Those appear below:

McHenry County School Districts

Beginning Salaries (with Bachelor’s Degree)

48,237 – CHSD 155 (Cary Grove High School)

42,068 – Richmond-Burton HS 157

41,203 – Riley CCSD 18

40,958 – Crystal Lake CCSD 47

40,353 – McHenry CHSD 156

39,290 – Woodstock CUSD 200

39,216 – Nippersink SD 2

38,544 – Cary CCSD 26

38,191 – Marengo CHSD 154

38,185 – Harvard CUSD 50

37,098 – Prairie Grove CSD 46

36,640 – Johnsburg CUSD 12

36,519 – Huntley CUSD 158

36,097 – Fox River Grove CSD 3

35,638 – Marengo-Union E CSD 165

35,095 – McHenry CCSD 15

34,521 – Alden-Hebron CUSD 19

31,174 – Harrison SD 36

McHenry County School Districts

Beginning Salaries (with Master’s Degree)

54,749 – CHSD 155  (Cary Grove High School)

46,108 – Crystal Lake CCSD 47

45,324 – Riley CCSD 18

45,308 – Richmond-Burton HS 157

45,100 – Woodstock CUSD 200

44,590 – McHenry CHSD 156

43,378 – Nippersink SD 2

43,213 – Cary CCSD 26

42,997 – Prairie Grove CSD 46

41,664 – Marengo CHSD 154

41,237 – McHenry CCSD 15

41,000 – Johnsburg CUSD 12

39,815 – Harvard CUSD 50

39,655 – Fox River Grove CSD 3

39,530 – Huntley CUSD 158

39,271 – Marengo-Union E CSD 165

38,060 – Alden-Hebron CUSD 19

35,174 – Harrison SD 36

Always good to have more information.

There’s also a page comparing Cary Elementary School salaries to those outside of McHenry County.

The teachers’ web site reviews cost cutting since 2009.

Missing is cost increases going back to the year when the teachers’ union won a solid majority of the school board.

District 300 in No Hurry to Post New Teachers’ Contract

June 04, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Contract, District 300, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Union

School District 300 is apparently in no hurry to allow the public to see its contract.

What I see on my screen when I look at refreshed version of the District3 00 "contracts" page.

This is the “contracts” page that is supposed to have the link to the contract. I have had it open and refreshed it several times by hitting the F5 button.

 

Nothing new popped up when I checked it after employees went home Friday.

If you can find the contract online, please email me its URL.

May 20, 2011, District 300 Negotiating Details

June 02, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Contract, Distrrict 300, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Salaries, Union

Since I just found the following memo, I wrongly assumed it had been just released. My bad.

I would remind folks that in 2008, Huntley School District 158′s Board released the “final offer” contract language for the taxpayer public to see, plus the union’s last position.

The non-teachers in this 2006 photo of people milling around after a school board meeting might have been interested in the teacher contract details before it was passed.

Summary of the Board of Education’s Proposals — May 20, 2011

The Board of Education’s last proposal to the teachers’ union, with the option of a one or two year contract, is:

  • A step freeze for all union members (lane movement would still occur)
  • Insurance changes that provide two options:
    1. Teachers may choose an HSA that will save them more on out-of-pocket expenses than the current plan, or
    2. Teachers may continue on the current PPO or HMO plans with higher deductibles and co-pays*
  • The pay rate for bus and lunch supervision will be reduced from $32/hour to $9/hour*
  • The number of students that trigger overload pay (i.e. extra pay to teachers for extra students in their classroom) would be increased by 2
  • Additional cost-saving items including that teachers could advance a lane on the salary schedule only once per year; evaluation handbooks will be available on line instead of printed, and stipends for teachers relating to the school’s website would be discontinued
  • Teachers would be given a preference for coaching and extra-pay jobs*
  • Teachers would have the same last day of school as the students, instead of being required to report to work the day after students leave*
  • Teachers at the middle schools could be assigned up to 190 students, and teachers at the middle and high schools could be assigned up to 315 minutes, or 5 hours and 15 minutes, of student contact time
  • The District would have the right to assign teachers who have been with the district for 8 years or less to classrooms based on student enrollment and programmatic needs
  • Elementary teachers would receive three early release days for completing report cards and would be given additional time to prepare the report cards*
  • Other than the first two days of school, in-service days would no longer be a shortened work day for teachers, but would be the same hours as the regular school day*
  • The district would agree to form a “collaborative council” to improve
    communication between teachers, principals and central office administrators.*
    LEAD’s last proposal to the Board stated that they would agree to several of these items including:
  • The proposed changes to the insurance plan
  • The reduction of the hourly rate for bus and lunch supervision
  • The additional cost-savings items mentioned above relating to lane movement on the salary schedule, evaluation handbooks and the website construction stipend
  • The preference for extra pay positions
  • The early release days and additional time for elementary teachers to complete report cards
  • The elimination of the last teacher attendance day

However, LEAD also included proposals that would reduce the concessions listed above:

  • A wage freeze for most, but not all, of the teachers; certain teachers would receive a 1.9% wage increase
  • An additional lane, and, therefore additional salary costs, would be added to the salary schedule for teachers working towards a doctorate degree
  • The number of students who triggered overload pay would be increased by 2, but the class size for elementary schools would be decreased
  • Non-certified nurses would receive two additional sick days

In addition, LEAD rejected the necessary language changes that would allow the district flexibility to reorganize schools and assign teachers based on enrollment and student needs. Without those changes, the District is significantly limited in its ability to establish aschedule that provides the best educational outcomes for students.

= = =

*These items are either LEAD proposals or counter-proposal that are incorporated into the Board’s final proposal.

Two McHenry High School Board Candidates Address Wonder Lake Voters

March 13, 2011 By: Cal Skinner Category: Beth Taylor, McHenry, McHenry Citizens Tax Watch, McHenry High School Board, McHenry High School District 156, Steve Bellmore, Strike, Teacher, Teacher Contract, Teacher Layoffs, Teacher Negotiations, Teacher Pay, Teacher Salaries, Teacher Strike, Teachers Union, Wonder Lake

David Yang sits at the head table in front of a "Don't Tread on Me" flag.

McHenry Citizens Tax Watch, a new group springing out of Wonder Lake founded by Bob Anderson and David Yang, held a meeting Sunday afternoon at Christ the King Catholic Church.

It was a bifurcated one featuring National Taxpayers United of Illinois’ Jim Tobin and his daughter Christina, now a Vice President of her father’s group, plus two candidates for the McHenry High School Board.

I’ll concentrate on the latter today, since defeat of the high school’s referendum next month is one of the reasons the group was founded.

Wonder Lake's Bob Anderson led the meeting.

Anderson, who moderated the meeting in back of a Vote NO yard sign, told the audience that the group was concentrating on not only

 

  • defeating this second time around attempt to hike taxes (after a 73% loss last fall), but also
  • convincing legislators not to allow such repeat referendums, plus
  • ending the right of teachers to strike and
  • supporting the “3 in a Row” slate, all of whose candidates “have assured me they won’t support the tax increase.”

“I’ll be supporting them,” Anderson declared.

Beth Taylor and Steve Bellmore, two members of the “3 in a Row” slate, gave opening statements and answered questions.

Let me give you a flavor of what went on.

Steven Bellmore

First Bellmore:

“When the School Board threatened to cut Advanced Placement, extra curricular, co-curricular and sports, I said, ‘Enough is enough!’

“We’ve had money in there to the tune of $25 million that’s basically disappeared.”

He argued for more transparency, decrying “their lack of candidness with the community.”

“You can’t spend money you don’t have,” he added.

Taylor explained,

Beth Taylor

“I got fired up to run about the same time Steve did.”

She told of attending a meeting called by the School Board last fall where four choices were outlined.

“The School Board chose the third worst.  It would have made high school a miserable experience.

“They sprang it without warning.

“Where are we going to be two to three years from now?”

Asked about what concessions the group was seeking, mention in the pamphlet published here Sunday, Bellmore said they would be looking to both the administration and teachers.

He pointed out that salaries had gone up 48% over five years in McHenry, while fringe benefits had increased 59%.

Bellmore compare that to salary increases of 18% in Johnsburg and 8% in Richmond-Burton. Fringe benefit increases there had been 9% and 4% over the five year period.

‘Why the disparity?” he asked.

So what concessions does he seek?

“A three-year hard freeze on salaries and concessions on benefits.”

Bellmore said that McHenry High School teachers paid nothing for their own health insurance and their families got an 85% subsidy.

Steve Bellmore holds up "3 in a Row" yard sign. Beth Taylor is on his left and Bob Anderson can be seen in the background.

That compares to Crystal Lake District 155′s 100% payment of teacher health benefits and 50% for family coverage. In Johnsburg and Richmond, teachers have to pay 15% of their own health insurance cost and all of their family’s coverage.

“Is this going to balance the budget?

“No. It’s a start.

“Is there a need for scalebacks for classes and extra-curriculars?

“Probably,” but he noted, “They’ve already made scalebacks.”

Bellmore talked about meetings of the current school board:
“You go to these meetings and you get no answers.”

About future tax hikes: “If you want to pass a referendum, you need to communicate with (the community first).

“Right now, if we don’t have the money, you don’t spend it.”

At this point, Anderson asked,

“Are you going to be voting, ‘No?’”

Beth Taylor holds up the "3 in a Row" slate's pamhlet, which was published on McHenry County Blog, Sunday, March 13th.

Both Bellmore and Taylor answered, “Yes.”

Anderson revealed that he had talked to the third member of the slate, Timothy Byers, and he had made the same commitment.

“Everyone’s done with less,” Bellmore added. “I’m down 60% in my business.

“Teachers are important. I think the teachers here are quality.”

An audience member asked about the four options offered by the school board last fall.

Taylor explained that the worst was to close East High School and put the students on double shifts at West.

“Option three would have had an open campus at lunch with twenty-five teachers down,” she continued.

“They would be late, if they came back at all.”

She added that there would be no dances and rattled off a list of other extracurricular activities that would have disappeared.

The audience members pointed out that businessmen were regularly making 5-10% concessions.

A man asked whether any of the options had anything about concessions.

“The concessions on the salary end are cutting this many teachers,” Taylor said.

“It’s get rid of the new ones, the ones with fire in their bellies.”

A man observed that in the business world “people are taking 5-10% concessions.”

Taylor said, “The problem is that a lot of teachers are married to teachers. They are living in a bubble (isolated from what’s happening to other families).”

Someone wondered if negotiations might result in a strike.

“Possibly,” Taylor replied.

“If they refuse concessions, there may be a strike” Bellmore said. “There’s a lot of people out of work out there…We need a strong school board.

“In my mind, I’m watching out for the kids first. If you build trust with the community, you’re going to have trust with the community.”

McHenry East High School from the street where the new TIF-subsidized condominiums were built.

There was a question about the East High School’s new gym being built one-foot short. The implication from the audience was that this was a deliberate attempt to make East easier to close.

Taylor reacted by pointing out the absurdity of the state’s requiring 8o acres for new schools.

“I don’t think a new school makes smarter kids.”

Bellmore pointed out that since 2005 the district has added only 100 students, but hired 33 new staff. He did not know how many staff had left during that time, he admitted.

After the meeting, I asked Taylor about her having had a “Vote Yes” sign in front of her home last fall.

She told me she had two children in high school and was horrified at what the school board had proposed.

“I was thinking with my heart, not my head.”

The clear implication was that she was following her head this time around and it led her to the positions she enunciated.