District 300 Weighs In on Potential School Bus State Aid Cuts

A press release from School District 300:

Proposed cut to transportation funding concerning to D300 community

The State of Illinois provides “categories” of education funding to school districts, such as

  • transportation
  • special education
  • bilingual education.

The state mandates that the district provide these categorical services but doesn’t adequately or reliably fund them.

The state has already cut D300’s transportation funding by 24% over the past three years.

This total cut of over $3.5 million has occurred as our student enrollment continues to increase and the cost of gas keeps rising.

But the pain could get a lot worse in the near future.

Governor Pat Quinn’s proposed budget that is currently being debated by state legislators would reduce the D300 regular education transportation funding from $1.8 million to a projected $60,000 in the 2013-2014 school year.

With the state budget scheduled to be finalized within the next couple of months, it is important that D300 families and staff members understand the potential implications now.

Some of those advocating for this cut suggest that school districts could start charging parents for transportation services.

District 300 school buses and parents drop off kids at Lake in the Hills Elementary School.

District 300 school buses and parents drop off kids at Lake in the Hills Elementary School.

Taking a closer look at this and other so-called solutions, our district’s concerns include:


•  Recent history – Over the past three years, D300 has already consolidated bus routes and reduced bus services to maximize efficiency without sacrificing safety.   To further reduce our bus services at this point would extend this difficult transition for our families.

•  Logistics –  If we reduce bus service, many of our families – especially parents of younger children – would start driving their children to school.  There would be huge logistical issues in handling the many additional parents dropping off students in cars.

•  Environment – Quality of life would decrease with thenoise and traffic created by more parents driving students to school.

 Safety – Buses have proven to be a much safer way than cars to get large numbers of students to school.  Also, if young children have to walk a farther distance (beyond the current 1.5-mile state cap), there could be an increased chance of harm.

•  Attendance – The achievement gap would widen, as attendance may drop among students without reliable transportation.

•  School day – More time would be needed to coordinate student drop-offs and pick-ups.


•  Students qualifying for free/reduced meals – Would the district waive their bus fee?  If so, how would that gap be funded?

•  Cost shift – Charging fees would be yet another expense for our middle-income families.

•  Achievement – The achievement gap would again be an issue, as financially strapped families who don’t qualify for fee waivers may not be able to reliably get their children to school for consistent teaching and learning.


In recent years we have cut millions from our budget.  Further cuts would be extremely difficult, as we have committed to long-range employee contracts with specific class size rules as the bulk of our district expenses.


District 300 Weighs In on Potential School Bus State Aid Cuts — 3 Comments

  1. As a Baby Boomer, I wonder how I was able to get to school, attending the same High School and Grade School as my Dad, with birth rates that far exceeded todays.

    Wasn’t there like an explosion of 80 M of us or so?

    One bus that went through the area’s main drag, always packed by the time it got to our pick up, so we routinely just walked.

    New schools weren’t built because the one’s in place somehow managed the Boomer crush of students.

    Somehow we survived all the ‘Environmental, Logistics, Safety’, etc. issues.

    How did they do it back then?

    Because this D300 testimonial has another round of, “it’s for the kids”, between this litany of excuses.

    Or are they admitting in this scribe’s finale, that they blew it once again, when agreeing to these “employee contracts”.

    But I’d prefer to think, that the ‘Greatest Generation’, rubbed off on us a bit.

  2. CUSD 300 bus transportation is operated and managed by Durham School Services which is locally under a union contract with Teamsters Local 330 in Elgin.

    Can’t locate the current contract, could FOIA it, but here’s the previous contract.


    One would hope the safety record of Teamster bus drivers is better than non-union.

    However by far the largest expenditure of a school district is found in the teacher union contract.

    The teacher union for CUSD 300 is Local Education Association of District 300 (LEAD300), IEA-NEA.

    http://www.d300.org > Departments > Human Resources > Contracts.


    An even more significant source of savings could be found in pension hiking legislation after the pension protection clause was added to the Illinois State Constitution at the 1970 Constitutional Convention. In 38 of the next 40 years the state legislature passed pension hiking legislation signed by pension hiking Governors.

    The reason the state has no money is pension hiking legislation combined with large salary increases, all in exchange for campaign contributions and votes. Local and State governments in Illinois artfully played kicked the can and hide and seek for 40 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *