And, it’s the biggest I’ve seen this year.
Four pages.
It an introductory pamphlet that also contains what he wants to do in Springfield, if elected State Representative.
Listed are
- meaningful property tax relief
- cutting wasteful government spending
- Pushing to end pension abuse and pay-to-play corruption
- term limits
- refusing pension and health care benefits
The first page emphasizes the length of time Dan Wilbrandt’s family has lived in the upper Fox River Valley.
Page two lists local connections back to 1866.
Dan Wilbrandt promises to follow in his family’s tradition and outlines his Springfield priorities.
A letter from Dan Wilbrandt is on the address side of the piece.
Is Dan running for office or is he asking us to vote for his ancestors?
Is Allen Skilikorn running for office or is he asking us to vote for Dan Proft?
Is Paul Serwatka running for office or is he asking us to vote for Ron Paul?
Is Carolyn Schofeld running for office or is she asking us to vote for the teachers’ unions?
Aren’t these childish barbs fun?
Dan Proft’s Super-PAC money is demanding that we vote for Allen Skillicorn.
Does the term “bought-and-paid-for” resonate with anybody?
Boethius – Fun Yes!
When I see the next mailing for this bunch, I’ll come up with something on it too.
But I think you summarized the race in the 66th.
Honestly, Wilbrandt reminds me of a kid right out of college trying to impress me in a job interview telling me he or she was a great student; when all I care about is what they will do for me.
I like Dan but his points are:
meaningful property tax relief
cutting wasteful government spending
Pushing to end pension abuse and pay-to-play corruption
term limits
refusing pension and health care benefits
Aren’t they all saying the same thing?
Robert Williams – Schofeld is supported by Super-PAC money too.
“Aren’t these childish barbs fun?”
Really, Boethius?
You either suffer from a split personality disorder or your hypocrisy is astounding!