Franks’ IMRF Bill Passes without Dissent, Members Elected This Fall Ineligible for Pensions

Jack Franks

Jack Franks

State Rep. Jack Franks has won his legislative battle about IMRF pensions.

Senate Bill 2701 with his abolition language passed 110-0 Sunday.

It is now in the State Senate waiting for approval of House amendments.

Because the McHenry County Board did not act quickly enough, their June 2nd Human Resources Committee meeting to eliminate participation in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund and subsequent County Board meeting to ratify that committee’s recommendation will probably be seen as an afterthought by the public.

In the legislative process, the bill sent to the House by State Senator Pam Althoff, which required county board members to keep logs of the hours they work on county business (1,000 required for McHenry County), has the following legislative history:

Senate Amendment 1

Provides that a person who holds elective office as a member of a governing body of a participating municipality shall not be considered a participating employee, unless

(1) the person has elected to become a participating employee;

(2) the governing body has filed a resolution certifying that a person in that position is expected to work more than 600 hours (or 1,000 hours if the participating municipality has adopted a specified resolution); and

(3) the person has submitted logs evidencing that he or she has met the hourly standard.

Requires the resolution to be adopted and filed with the Fund no more than 90 days after the general election in which any member of the governing body was elected.

Requires participating governing body members to file the log with the authorized agent of the participating municipality.

House Amendment 2

Replaces everything after the enacting clause.

Reinserts the provisions of the engrossed bill with the following changes.

Prohibits participation by a person who is an elected member of a county board and is first so elected on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act. [Emphasis added.]

Imposes administrative requirements on current elected county board members.

Requires a participating elected member of a county board to submit time sheets documenting the time spent on official government business.

Provides that the submitted time sheets are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Amends the Freedom of Information Act to make a conforming change. Effective immediately.

House Amendment 3

In the new Section of the Illinois Pension Code relating to participation by elected county board members, deletes the provision exempting the required time sheets from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Deletes the corresponding amendment to the Freedom of Information Act.

= = = = =

None of the non-incumbent Republican County Board candidates said they would participate in the IMRF pension program, if elected.


Comments

Franks’ IMRF Bill Passes without Dissent, Members Elected This Fall Ineligible for Pensions — 13 Comments

  1. Well, the County Board’s Human Resources Committee meeting to eliminate participation in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund is NOT the AFTERTHOUGHT here, Frank’s BILL IS !

    Will the Northwest Herald report this correctly or give Franks credit &
    Another opportunity to slam the Board ?

    Looks like a trap, people .

    So put the FOIAA language in there but . . .

    This DOES NOT address those current people wanting to
    GET OUT of the IMRF because they are stuck ‘ in the hotel ‘. !

    Just think of how much money the state & counties would save
    If people COULD renounce the pensions.

  2. Pension was never an issue for me in my bid for County Board.

    Never was an issue.

    Let’s move on.

  3. Well there is SOMEONE making a big deal
    Out of the pensions who is running for county board chair & hasn’t withdrawn running for state rep. As well.

  4. Our government has deteriorated into one of crony capitalism and crony legislation.

    Why were no fiscal notes requested?

    Why was similar legislation not passed years ago?

    Why are we not applying the same law to ALL elected officials including members of the State Legislature?

    Answer: CRONY LEGISLATION TARGETED AT CERTAIN PEOPLE!!

  5. If the state legislators were actually serious about saving taxpayer dollars, would they not eliminate healthcare benefits for all elected officials?

  6. Watchdog 2 – You never said what “dirt” you researched about Franks’ father.

    All bark and no bite?

  7. Questioning: Right AND if they were serious, they would expand that language to remove pensions for ALL elected officials who would have otherwise been eligible to start the plan effective tomorrow.

  8. img src=”https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/cjo3qsnvaaej2iu.jpg?w=500” alt=”” /

  9. Open the time sheets to FOIA requests or make all board members ineligible for IMRF. “they can’t have it but we can”

    That doesn’t seem right.

  10. What would you do Martha?

    Allow them to keep their pensions and not have to prove that they are doing the work?

  11. NO…I will not be signing up for an IMRF pension.

    I am firm on this decision and have been so since I started this journey.

    Enough said!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *