“Sunshine Activist” Cal Skinner

Back in 2007, less than two years after McHenry County Blog was founded, State Sunshine and Open Records interviewed me on my experiences with the Freedom of Information Act.

With Jack Franks’ Freedom of Information Office trying to delay and charge McHenry County Blog for filing FOIA requests because I have filed more than fifty in the last year, I thought the following might be of interest:

Sunshine Activist Cal Skinner

This week’s Sunshine Activist interview is with Cal Skinner of the McHenry County Blog in Illinois. Cal has long experience at promoting greater knowledge of what local units of government are up to through determined, diligent and effective use of Illinois open records laws.

We really, really appreciate the willingness of all the terrific Sunshine Activists out there to patiently answer our questions. At the end of the year, we believe this growing resource will be a source of edification and inspiration for novice and seasoned FOIAers alike.

And thank you, Cal, for this week’s interview.

  1. What year did you file your first open records request?

    Decades ago. Can’t remember.

  2. What documents were you looking for?

    Let me pick one. I filed one with the US CDC (Centers for Disease Control) in about 1991 for anything it had on the almost $500,000 study which studied the transmission of HIV within Illinois prisons.

  3. Did you get those documents?

    I received a one-page poster posted in the international AIDS conference in Italy which revealed that one-third of one percent of Illinois inmates became HIV-infected during the first year they were incarcerated. That doesn’t sound like much, but if the Illinois HIV transmission rate were one-third of one percent, all of the HIV infections in the history of the epidemic would have occurred in one year.

  4. Charles Davis of the National Freedom of Information Coalition has talked about having “a FOI moment”. Have you had “a FOI moment” and can you describe it?

    I guess it was figuring out that the CDC FOI wanted to suppress the quite important, but not-too-stunning finding that HIV is spread within prisons. (Think rape in prison, tattoos, sharing needles.) If you remember the CDC’s TV condom campaign of the late 1980’s, it cost about what this study cost. In other works, the prison study was a significant expenditure. I could not believe this so-called public health agency would not want to shout the finding from the house tops. It had policy implications. The only way I got a study written by the CDC was to contact every Illinois congressman and senator, a fair number I knew from being state representative, and asking them to help pry one out. Even then, the guy who wrote it minimized how bad the situation was. And the CDC refused to publish it. I am convinced that was because the CDC did not get the results it expected and wanted. The policy implications were clear. If prisoners were infecting other prisoners, then the infected inmates should be housed separately. That, of course, was not politically correct and still has not been implemented. (If I sound bitter at the incompetence of the CDC, I am. How many uninfected inmates were infected while prison officials sat by and did nothing to protect the uninfected?)

  5. What is the worst (or funniest or most obstructionist or most outrageous) reply you’ve ever received?

    It came from McHenry County College. The college told me I could not have a consultant’s study for which it paid $70,000 and with which it justified borrowing $35 million. The reason? It was proprietary information. The college even cited a section of the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

  6. How quickly do you generally receive replies to a request?

    Usually, the maximum amount of time is taken.

  7. About how many open records requests have you filed?

    Dozens, scores.

  8. How do you let your friends, neighbors or the local media know about the documents you get?

    I often write articles about them on McHenry County Blog unless I use what I get from one government to give me clues of what to ask from another one.

  9. Have you run into any trouble as the result of filing open records requests?

    With McHenry County College and the City of Crystal Lake I have about the same project. The idea of putting a minor league baseball stadium on the campus of McHenry County College originated with the city manager. Staffs of the two governments communicated for over two years, but neither would provide any information. One even denied it existed.

  10. What’s the most significant political outcome that has resulted from the work you do?

    McHenry County Blog articles on the college’s proposed baseball stadium have raised the issue of whether the minor league baseball team’s revenues are capable of repaying the $35 million to be borrowed. So far, no newspaper has even raised the question.

  11. Has your local newspaper ever commented on the work you do? Favorably or unfavorably?

    Yes. Both daily papers, reporters for the Daily Herald (the 3rd largest in Illinois) and the Northwest Herald (the dominant paper in McHenry County with about 50% penetration) picked up on the county board’s attempt to punish me for taking pictures of the board members in what unknowingly were a series of flash photographs by proposing a rule to prohibit flash photography and force photographers to the back corners of the county board room.

    A series of articles and editorials resulted in mentioning the name of my blog, which undoubtedly increased readership.

    Another First Amendment issue made the Northwest Herald as well. I went to a meeting of the Prairie Grove School District near Crystal Lake. The board had apparently approved a contract for its superintendent, but in a secret meeting. It was meeting that night–election night–to rectify the previous dubiously legal action. A number attending the meeting were outside in the hall. As is the case with most public bodies who go into executive session when I am around, I try to take photos of those behind closed doors. I did so and when one of a seemingly “nice” older lady board member started acting very unladylike, shaking her fist and yelling at the top of her voice I tried to get a picture of that. Then I started laughing. I found it hilarious. An administrator came out and walked across the hall into the gym. About 10-15 minutes later he came down the hall with a police officer, who proceeded to evict me, even though prior to his appearance no one had asked me to leave.

    If you want the blow-by-blow, it’s here:

  12. What’s your best advice for other “Sunshine Activists”?

    Be persistent. Act the question in different ways. Let reporters know what you are not getting that they might be interested in.

  13. What do you know now that you wish you had known when you started?

    I already knew some public officials prefer the darkness, but I suspect many people want to think the best of their public officials and that is not always a warranted opinion.

  14. If you could change your state’s open records law just one way, what would that change be?

    A Cook County Appellate Court decision has gutted the Freedom of Information Act in Illinois. I would be happy to share the court opinion and the devastating footnote with you. Please ask separately.

  15. Do you participate in any formal way in organizations that promote the freedom of information cause?

    No.

  16. Are you willing to have other “sunshine activists” from your state get in touch with you?

    Sure.

Thank you, Cal, for taking the time to share your story with our readers.

If you are interested in contacting Cal Skinner you may do so via his blog or by email.


Comments

“Sunshine Activist” Cal Skinner — 22 Comments

  1. Cal, did you read the FOIA act before you voted on it, or did you not?

    What is the definition of a resurgent requester?

  2. **What is the definition of a resurgent requester?**

    Ummm… the word “resurgent” isn’t in the IL Freedom of Information Act.

  3. Great.

    Now that my typo got your attention.

    Cal, what’s the definition of a recurrent requester

  4. It’s called Pat Quinn bravo sierra diddling with the piublic’s rights.

  5. Thank you, Cal, for always standing up for transparency and decency. That why the Democrats and and the ‘Republirats’ like Lee “Lavender Underground’ Daniels and the late Al ’19th ward import’ Jourdan hated you.

    They couldn’t control you!

  6. McHenry County chooses to deny Mr. Skinner’s FOIA requests based on the “Frequent Requester” criteria.

    McHenry County is not required to do so.

    McHenry County did not deny Mr. Skinner’s FOIA requests until Jack Franks began working as McHenry County Board Chair.

  7. Mark is a conservatives.

    Conservatives want to enforce laws already on the books.

    Mark is mad because a law is being enforced.

    Mark is a hypocrit.

  8. The intent of Recurrent Requester is not to prohibit units of government from responding to a FOIA request from someone who would qualify as a Recurrent Requester.

    Good like finding someone in the Attorney General’s office or the court system who would issue an opinion, ruling, or decision to prohibit a unit of government from responding to a FOIA request from someone who would qualify as a Recurrent Requester, if the unit of government chooses to respond to the request.

  9. Mark is lying again.

    Cal’s a recurrent requester.

    The States Attorney office agrees.

    A FOIA officer denying a FOIA request from a recurrent requester is entirely lawful.

    Good luck finding a prosecutor who would punish a unit of government for enforcing a state law.

    Quit lying, Mark.

  10. Moderate’s role is to agitate, discredit, and promote Jack Franks.

    No one claimed a FOIA officer denying a FOIA request based on recurrent requester is unlawful.

    There was nothing to prohibit McHenry County from fulfilling Mr. Skinner’s FOIA request.

    The only thing that changed was Jack Franks.

    Jack Franks wants to deny Cal Skinner, Jack Franks gets what he wants.

    Jack Franks wants to hire Oliver Serafini and Bridget Geenen without going through the typical hiring process, Jack Franks gets what he wants.

    Oliver Serafini wants to wear two of his bosses political “JF” logo stickers on his shirt, Oliver Serafini does it at the McHenry County booth at the McHenry Chamber of Commerce Expo on February 25, 2017.

    Oliver Serafini wants to pass out nail files with the “JF logo”, Franks “wave”, and “McHenry County Board Chairman Jack Franks” imprinted at the McHenry County booth at the McHenry Chamber of Commerce Expo, Oliver Serafini does it, even apparently with County Administration present.

    It is the Jack Franks show over at the county now.

    Seems like the County allows Jack Franks to do pretty much whatever he wants.

    Flex time for patronage hires.

    The Jack Franks election campaign pitch to Cut 10 percent of the property tax bill for every property taxing district in the county….that’s nowhere to be found.

    But the county hired a Madigoon for a position which wasn’t posted, that was the result of the Franks election.

  11. Mark,

    Do you read to your lies before you post them?

    You said, “there was nothing to prohibit McHenry County from fulfilling Mr. Skinner’s FOIA request.” \

    YES THERE IS! Cal is a recurrent requester by state law!

    The fact is, Cal is a drain on the already precious resources of the county.

    Cal weaponized FOIA as a way to grind the government to a halt and be nuisance, which is EXACTLY what the recurrent requester law stops.

    Effectively, what public good does creepy Cal do by requesting pictures of employees? This. Is. Wrong.

    Recurrent Requesters are WRONG.

    Mark, you lied again. Quit Lying.

  12. As was posted, the county did not have to label Mr. Skinner a recurrent requester.

    The State government is not going to force a local unit of government to label someone a recurrent requester.

  13. So, Mark and Cal askinner are advocating for not enforcing the laws we have.

    Good to know.

  14. McHenry County did not have to label Cal Skinner a recurrent requester.

    Simple as that.

    Moderate can’t find anyone in government to say the State government can force a local unit of government to label someone a recurrent requester.

    That’s because the state government will not force a local unit of government to label someone a recurrent requester.

    The local unit of government can fulfill as many FOIA requests as they desire.

    What is the legitimate reason to label Cal Skinner a recurrent requester?

    There is none.

    Mr. Skinner obtains information and posts it on his political blog.

    Many taxpayers read the political blog.

    The issue is that Jack Franks wants to control the blogs access to information.

    Jack Franks likes to control what goes to media too.

    That’s why Jack Franks hired his own “Communications Specialist” to distribute stories that paint Jack Franks in a favorable light.

    No previous McHenry County Board Chair had their own “Communications Specialist” in which they hired whomever the hand picked.

    What a joke.

    That is not in the county’s best interest.

    It’s in Jack Franks’ best interest.

    To make matters worse, half the budget comes from Transportation, not even the County Board Chair department, and Transportation apparently was not even consulted in the hire.

    So just more of the same, Moderate being here to promote Jack Franks by squashing the person most responsible for transparency about Jack Franks.

  15. Mark lies, twists words. Let’s first start with Mark’s claim “many taxpayers read the blog.” That is false. How do we know? Exhibit A: Cindy’s YouTube channel from the top billed comment in Cal’s coverage of Joe Walsh’s protest. How many people viewed her video in the last two days since it was posted? 158 Let’s for a moment be very, very generous and say that all 158 came from Cal’s blog. That’s .0005% of the population of McHenry county viewed Cal’s blog. Let’s be very generous again and say that people actually come to the blog to read the diatribes of a twisted and disgraced former State Rep and not the comments so the viewership is triple that figure! That’s stil .0015% of the population. For 1% of taxpayers to actually give a crap about this blog, Cindy’s video she shared should have about 3,000 views and it is NO WHERE CLOSE TO THAT despite there being 66 comments.

    Mark the Liar, the reason Cal dabble in this drivel anymore is because he has you, Ersel, Yvonne and the rest of his band of misfits along for the ride to ban together in your forgotten misery to strong arm and bully the local GOP because THEY are that 158 amount of people.

    If you don’t believe me, Cal, what’s your average click per post? 40-120 right?! How many UNIQUE visitors did you have last year? Less than 1,200? If you were a newspaper, you would be bankrupt. And you aren’t even that great of a PAC either because you’ve raised less that Franks did last quarter!

  16. Cal Skinner posts information from his FOIA requests on the blog to inform taxpayers.

    Cal Skinner has decades of experience in Illinois government.

    There is no obstruction in submitting a FOIA request.

    Along comes Jack Franks, and suddenly FOIA denials appear.

    Doubt that’s a coincidence.

    Jack Franks is very interested in controlling messaging.

    Jack Franks hired a “Communications Expert.”

    Prior Board Chairs did not have a full time “Communications Expert,” in fact, the position did not exist at the time of the hire.

    What is the “zero based budget” cost justification for the Communications Expert?

    There apparently was none.

    Jack Franks campaigned on “zero based budgeting.”

    ++++++++++

    Agitator in action.

    Watch Rigging the Election by Project Veritas to learn about agitators.

    ++++++++++

    YouTube

    Project Veritas Action channel

    Rigging the Election – Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

    published on October 17, 2016

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

  17. Mark,
    Nice job addressing none of what I said. Because you didn’t respond, I’ll post it again.

    Mark lies, twists words. Let’s first start with Mark’s claim “many taxpayers read the blog.” That is false. How do we know? Exhibit A: Cindy’s YouTube channel from the top billed comment in Cal’s coverage of Joe Walsh’s protest. How many people viewed her video in the last two days since it was posted? 158 Let’s for a moment be very, very generous and say that all 158 came from Cal’s blog. That’s .0005% of the population of McHenry county viewed Cal’s blog. Let’s be very generous again and say that people actually come to the blog to read the diatribes of a twisted and disgraced former State Rep and not the comments so the viewership is triple that figure… That’s stil .0015% of the population! For 1% of taxpayers to actually give a crap about this blog, Cindy’s video should have about 3,000 views and it is NO WHERE CLOSE TO THAT despite there being 66 comments.

    Mark the Liar, the reason Cal dabbles in this drivel anymore is because he has you, Ersel, Yvonne and the rest of his band of misfits along for the ride to ban together in your forgotten misery to strong arm and bully the local GOP because THEY are that 158 amount of people.

    If you don’t believe me, Cal, what’s your average click per post? 40-120 right?! How many UNIQUE visitors did you have last year? Less than 1,200? If you were a newspaper, you would be bankrupt. And you aren’t even that great of a PAC either because you’ve raised less that Franks did last quarter!

    So, Mark, why do you enforce the recurrent requester law?

    Because a washed up, delusional, alleged pedophile with a following smaller than The Music Man’s band tries to obstruct and grind government to a halt by weaponizing FOIA.

    No.

    That is wrong.

    And it is a waste of taxpayer dollars.

  18. Also, let’s all join in for a laugh because Mark the liar posted a video about how the election was rigged!! Mark, who’s POTUS?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *