Governor Amendatorily Vetoes Marengo Rescue Squad Referendum Tax Hike Bill, Says Taxpayers Should Be Able to Cut Taxes, Too

The Marengo Rescue Squad’s Station No. 2 at the corner of Routes 23 and 176.

Governor Bruce Rauner today amendatorily vetoed Senate Bill 2297 sponsored by State Senator Pam Althoff and State Rep. Steve Reick to allow voters to cut as well as raise taxes.

As originally passed, the bill would have authorized putting on the ballot a question as to whether property taxes should be raised up to 4/10 of one percent of assessed value to pay for ambulance service.

The legislation was supported by both the Marengo Rescue Squad District and the Marengo Fire Protection District.

John Kimmel from the Rescue Squad and Steve Frazier of the Fire Department testified in favor of the bill on May 10th, as did state association representatives.

Here is the Governor’s ammendatory  veto message:

Today, I return Senate Bill 2297 with specific recommendations for change.

This legislation provides for rescue squad districts to levy a new tax to fund ambulance services. I applaud that this tax is required to go to the electors of a district, as giving citizens’ more control over their tax burdens is essential to combating the property tax and excessive local government crisis being experienced across Illinois and driving citizens out of our state.

However, the local and citizen control of taxes in legislation goes only in one direction, and there is no ability for overtaxed electors to vote to bring this property tax elevating levy—or  any increase in their property taxes—back down.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(e) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return Senate Bill 2297, entitled “AN ACT concerning local government”, with the following specific recommendations for change:

On page 2, immediately after line 6, by inserting the following:

“A board of trustees of a rescue squad district where an ambulance service tax has been imposed under this Section pursuant to a referendum held on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 100th General Assembly may submit the question at an election to the voters of the district of the question of reducing or discontinuing the tax. The board shall certify the question to the proper election authority. The election authority must submit the question in substantially the following form:

Shall the ambulance service tax currently imposed in (name of Rescue Squad District) at a rate of (insert rate) be (reduced to (insert rate))(discontinued)?

If a majority of the electors voting on the question vote in the affirmative, then, the tax shall be reduced or discontinued as set forth in the question.

Whenever a petition, subject to the petition requirements of Section 28-3 of the Election Code, is presented to the board of trustees of a rescue squad district where an ambulance service tax has been imposed under this Section requesting that the tax be reduced or discontinued, the board shall cause the proposition to be certified to the proper election officials who shall submit the proposition to the voters at the next appropriate election in accordance with this subsection and general election law. The ballot question shall be in substantially the following form on the ballot:

Shall the ambulance service tax currently imposed in (name of Rescue Squad District) at a rate of (insert rate) be (reduced to (insert rate))(discontinued)? YES NO

If a majority of the electors voting on the question vote in the affirmative, then, the tax shall be reduced or discontinued as set forth in the question.

 Section 10. The Property Tax Code is amended by amending Section 18-205 as follows:

(35 ILCS 200/18-205)

Sec. 18-205. Referendum to increase the extension limitation.

(a) A taxing district is limited to an extension limitation of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index during the 12 month calendar year preceding the levy year, whichever is less. A taxing district may increase its extension limitation for one or more levy years if that taxing district holds a referendum before the levy date for the first levy year at which a majority of voters voting on the issue approves adoption of a higher extension limitation. Referenda shall be conducted at a regularly scheduled election in accordance with the Election Code.

(b) The question shall be presented in substantially the following manner:

Shall the extension limitation under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for (insert the legal name, number, if any, and county or counties of the taxing district and geographic or other common name by which a school or community college district is known and referred to), Illinois, be increased from the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index over the prior levy year to (insert the percentage of the proposed increase)% per year for (insert each levy year for which the increased extension limitation will apply)?

(c) Whenever a petition, subject to the petition requirements of Section 28-3 of the Election Code, is presented to the governing body of a taxing district requesting that the taxing district’s aggregate extension be decreased by not more than 10% of its aggregate extension for the previous levy year, that governing body shall cause the proposition to be certified to the proper election officials who shall submit the proposition to the voters at the next appropriate election in accordance with this subsection and general election law. A petition under this subsection (c) shall include:

(1) the desired aggregate extension decrease;

(2) signatures by a number of registered voters equal to or greater than 5% of the total ballots cast in the taxing district at the last preceding general election; and

(3) an affidavit of publication, attesting that notice of the petition decrease the taxing district’s aggregate extension was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the taxing district.

The parties filing a petition under this Section shall give notice in substantially the following form:

NOTICE OF PETITION TO (INCREASE/DECREASE) (TAXING DISTRICT’S) PROPERTY TAX.

Residents of (taxing district) are notified that a petition will be filed with (taxing district) requesting a referendum to decrease property tax by (amount of increase or decrease) % for (tax levy year(s)).

A petition that meets the requirements of this subsection shall be placed on the ballot at the general election next following. Failure to publish the required notice of petition shall render the petition, and the results of any referendum held on the petition, null and void.

The ballot question shall be in substantially the following form on the ballot:

———————————————————-

Shall the property tax rate of (taxing district) be decreased by (insert amount) % in (tax levy year(s) )? YES NO

————————————————————

The increase or decrease is approved when three-fifths of the electors of the taxing district approve and the decrease shall be applicable for each levy year specified.

(d) The votes under subsection (b) or (c) must be recorded as “Yes” or “No”. Except as provided in subsection (c), if If a majority of voters voting on the issue approves the adoption of the increase, the increase shall be applicable for each levy year specified.

(e) The ballot for any question submitted pursuant to this Section shall have printed thereon, but not as a part of the question submitted, only the following supplemental information (which shall be supplied to the election authority by the taxing district) in substantially the following form:

(1) For the (insert the first levy year for which the increased or reduced extension limitation will be applicable) levy year the approximate amount of the additional or reduced tax extendable against property containing a single family residence and having a fair market value at the time of the referendum of $100,000 is estimated to be $ ….

(2) Based upon an average annual percentage increase (or decrease) in the market value of such property of … % (insert percentage equal to the average annual percentage increase or decrease for the prior 3 levy years, at the time the submission of the question is initiated by the taxing district, in the amount of (

A) the equalized assessed value of the taxable property in the taxing district less

(B) the new property included in the equalized assessed value),

the approximate amount of the additional or reduced tax extendable against such property for the levy year is estimated to be $ … and for the … levy year is estimated to be $ ….

Paragraph (2) shall be included only if the increased or reduced extension limitation will be applicable for more than one year and shall list each levy year for which the increased or reducedextension limitation will be applicable. The additional or reduced tax shown for each levy year shall be the approximate dollar amount of the increase or decrease over the amount of the most recently completed extension at the time the submission of the question is initiated by the taxing district. The approximate amount of the additional or reduced tax extendable shown in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be calculated by multiplying $100,000 (the fair market value of the property without regard to any property tax exemptions) by ( i) the percentage level of assessment prescribed for that property by statute, or by ordinance of the county board in counties that classify property for purposes of taxation in accordance with Section 4 of Article IX of the Illinois Constitution; (ii) the most recent final equalization factor certified to the county clerk by the Department of Revenue at the time the taxing district initiates the submission of the proposition to the electors; (iii) the last known aggregate extension base of the taxing district at the time the submission of the question is initiated by the taxing district; and (iv) the difference between the percentage increase or decrease proposed in the question and the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for the prior levy year (or an estimate of the percentage increase or decrease for the prior levy year if the increaseor decrease is unavailable at the time the submission of the question is initiated by the taxing district); and dividing the result by the last known equalized assessed value of the taxing district at the time the submission of the question is initiated by the taxing district. This amendatory Act of the 97th General Assembly is intended to clarify the existing requirements of this Section, and shall not be construed to validate any prior non-compliant referendum language. Any notice required to be published in connection with the submission of the question shall also contain this supplemental information and shall not contain any other supplemental information. Any error, miscalculation, or inaccuracy in computing any amount set forth on the ballot or in the notice that is not deliberate shall not invalidate or affect the validity of any proposition approved. Notice of the referendum shall be published and posted as otherwise required by law, and the submission of the question shall be initiated as provided by law.”

With these changes, Senate Bill 2297 will have my approval. I respectfully request your concurrence.

Here’s the Senate vote:

Here’s the House roll call:


Comments

Governor Amendatorily Vetoes Marengo Rescue Squad Referendum Tax Hike Bill, Says Taxpayers Should Be Able to Cut Taxes, Too — 1 Comment

  1. Reick’s and Spam Althoff’s true color’s exposed — and by a fink like the liar/lame duck Rauner.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.