Lakemoor Man Gets 38 Years on McHenry and Lake County Drug Charges

Frm the McHenry County State’s Attorney’s Office:

IVAN OLAN SENTENCED TO 38 YEARS IN THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Ivan Olan

Patrick D. Kenneally, McHenry County State’s Attorney, announced that Ivan Olan, 58, of Lakemoor, Illinois, was sentenced to a total of 38 years in the Illinois Department of Corrections for the Offenses of Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance and Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. 

The defendant was sentenced to 20 years in prison on September 7, 2021 by the Honorable McHenry County Judge Wilbrandt.

On September 14, 2021 he was sentenced to an additional 18 years in prison, to be served consecutively, by the Honorable Lake County Judge Rossetti. 

These cases were investigated by members of Lake County Metropolitan Enforcement Group and Round Lake Park Police Department.

They were prosecuted by Neil Adams and Brette Dunbar of the McHenry County State’s Attorney’s Office.


Comments

Lakemoor Man Gets 38 Years on McHenry and Lake County Drug Charges — 9 Comments

  1. Ah Yes another Fine upstanding Citizen of the ILL toilet hole…

  2. Drug dealer 38 years

    Serial child molester 10 years

    Drunk attorney runs guy over, kills him 5 years

    Your justice system is messed up.

    At this point, why shouldn’t people root for America to collapse?

  3. Kenneally and company overdoing it with justice on the wrong case.

    So typical out here. Get your priorities right Kenally–get the violent offenders and your judge buddies doling out near 40 year sentences for them.

    The War on Drugs has been lost, get with it and learn punishment and long sentences has changed nothing.

    Same crew that sent the sicko dressing up as a woman and breaking into womens bedrooms, sent him home TWICE with low bonds from McHenry County Jail only to have the sicko do it again for a 3rd time in as many weeks in the same neighborhood.

    Wake up Kennally.

    Unless this druggie killed someone, you and judge buddies out of line with this one.

  4. The new attorney general who couldn’t be a SCOTUS says he will get the delivery laws lowered to about equilvalent to a drunk lawyer running over and killing said person. Wait, this guy will be eating dinner in that Lakemoor subdivision soon.

  5. The new attorney general who couldn’t be a SCOTUS says he will get the delivery laws lowered to about equivalent to a drunk lawyer running over and killing said person. Wait, this guy will be eating dinner in that Lakemoor subdivision soon.

  6. Drug dealers shouldn’t get as much time as drunks who run people over or predators who molest children.

    If that’s Kwame Raoul’s stance, then I agree with him and will be sure to vote against any Republican candidate who disagrees with that simple concept.

    Period.

  7. You must have been talking about the U.S. Attorney General, Garland, not the state’s AG, Raoul.

    Well, if his position is to make sure drug dealers don’t get more time than people who run people over and kill them, then that’s one of the few positive things I could say about Garland.

    Most the headlines about him make him sound like an idiot.

    And it’s not that Garland could not have been on SCOTUS.

    McConnell was Senate Majority Leader at the time and simply refused to move the process along because he wanted to wait until after the presidential election (which ended up working in his favor, since Trump won, even though it was an unpopular move).

    It wouldn’t be inconceivable that had McConnell allowed for a vote, there would have been some Republicans who would have voted for Garland and he’d be confirmed.

    It wasn’t as if Garland failed to get enough votes, like Reagan’s pick Bork.

    The Senate just punted on his nomination to run out the clock until after the next election hoping they would win and get their own selection.

    If there was a vacancy today and Garland was the nominee, he would be confirmed.

    Democrats control the Senate now.

    I don’t expect Garland would be nominated though; if Democrats get a pick they will not go with an older white man.

    Even if it were Breyer being replaced, they would still not pick an older white man because they want to make SCOTUS more diverse.

    They’ll probably pick a black woman since only three judges are women and there has never been a black woman on the bench.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *