Update on Financing of Lakewood’s Proposed RedTail Golf Clubhouse Replacement, If Need to Use Property Taxes, Other Services Would Have to Be Cut

I’m not sure a review of the financing of the proposed RedTail Golf Club was intended to be a major part of last Tuesday’s Board meeting, but it turned out that way.

In in his opening remarks, Village President David Stavropoulos said that attorney Scott Puma would take a look at the ReTail construction contract.

In Public Comment I pointed out that the Clerk’s minutes had been excellent in the beginning, but, more recently, had been less explicit about what constituents said to the Trustees.

I also repeated the question I asked when the financing of the golf course purchase was being considered:

“Will this ever cost me a dime?”

Later in the meeting, Stavropoulos reminded everyone that “a prior Board had approved moving forward.”

Further, that emails had gone back and forth and that the architect had been consulted.

“Methodical” was the word he used to describe the process.

“Time is not on our side anymore,” Stavropoulos continued, because the current structure “is falling apart.”

He asserted the Village had taken a “very conservative approach with the numbers.

“No one was interested in the investor lease to own” option, so a construction manager approach had been adopted.

At this point, he said, “The Village is not committed to anything.”

The decision of the approximately $3.9 million to be spent will be made by the Board.

“The rounds of golf are only one aspect.” [I believe this is where Adminstrator Jean Heckman took over.]

There will be a “limited use of contingency funds.”

“Park impact fees” will help pay a $836,000 down payment.

The legality of the use of this money has been verifieded by attorney Puma.

The break-even point is 18,500 rounds.

In the last sixteen years, that figure has not been met just once.

It was 30,450 in the year just finished.

That’s enough to “cover the mortgage.”

The financial plan counts on new revenue from off-season events like showers, birthday parties and weddings. Additional in-season events were not included in revenue estimates.

The food will not be catered out for the estimated 160 events.

It was pointed out that there was about $200,000 in the reserve fund, which will be up to $300,000 for operations.

The mortgage will be at 4.5% for twenty years and be backed by the full faith and credit of the Village.

The cost will be $220,000 to $224,000 per year.

Attorney Puma explained that that inadequate revenue to pay the annual mortgage would not result in higher real estate taxes.

That’s because of the limit [the rate of inflation or 5%, whichever is lower] imposed by the Property Tax Cap.

If money had to be taken from property taxes to pay part of the mortgage, there “would have to be cuts in other areas of the Village budget,” Puma said.

Village Administrator Heckman, who provided some of the unattibuted information above added, “My husband and I paid that tax [to pay off the golf course purchase General Obligation Bonds] for seventeen years.”


Comments

Update on Financing of Lakewood’s Proposed RedTail Golf Clubhouse Replacement, If Need to Use Property Taxes, Other Services Would Have to Be Cut — 14 Comments

  1. Lakewood Village President in five years…..”I could’ve sworn ‘to break even’ $400 Green Fees charges and $50 for 7/11 dumpster cuisine would fly”.

  2. Stravametropolis sounds like BababababaBiden.

    I didn’t authorize the gold, sic, course, the other admin did.

    My goodness, now who do you blame, Popeye and Olive Oyle again.???

    Somebody needs to annex this small Village and soon.

    Hopefully LITH and not CL.

  3. “’No one was interested in the investor lease to own’ option,…”

    That would’ve told any businessperson with a half-watt of brain power the market won’t support this fiasco.

  4. Al: Ditto the fact that the bank wants a tax pledge.

    Too risky for the bank, but not too risky for the taxpayers!

  5. This project is for the use of a few individuals that have political power for their own benefit.

    The taxpayers of Lakewood will eventually be on the hook in coming years.

    Those responsible will by the tax bill date have left the State.

  6. Question for area golfers and banquet attendees:

    Are other area courses, including clubhouse/banquet better?

    Does the clubhouse and halfway house as proposed make it more or similarly attractive to others?

    You own a course (oops), but you have to keep it up if you’re going to make a go at it.

    Some of the reserve should be budgeted for marketing.

  7. I could get on board with this crap, if they hired Chigurh from No Country For Old Men, as the course Starter/Marshall antagonist, to keep play moving.

  8. Hi Cal,

    I thought repayment of bonds was exempt from the PTELL property tax cap. May you confirm if that is the case or not?

    Thanks.

  9. General Obligation Bonds are, but mortgages are not, according to Lakewood Attorney Scott Pumma

  10. As Cal says. If bonds are issued and borrower defaults, a court will allow that unit of government to raise property taxes in excess of PTELL instead of defaulting, which has happened with numerous area municipalities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *